• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

This is what the US Voted For, Good Luck....

PhantomWolf

Penultimate Amazing
Joined
Mar 6, 2007
Messages
21,203
If you pay attention to the news then it's well known that the Republican Party, assuming they keep their word, want to roll back the clock and so now the USA is about to regress several decades as they dismantle the social programs that Democrats have fought hard for since the 1960's.

I am going to do my best to link to as many of these as possible. Most of these effect minority groups, or the under privileged.

Women face a huge hit.

The biggest of these will revolve about control of reproduction. With the Republicans ready to repeal the ACA (a move that will cost 21 million people their Insurance coverage, many of whom will not be able to get new cover due to pre-existing conditions) they will lose access to cheap contraception.

Add to this the defunding of Planned Parenthood, the targeting of other Woman's Health Clinics like the GOP did in Texas, the rise of Catholic Hospitals taking over the marketplace, and the probable overturning of Row vs Wade, women's health and reproduction issues are going to be decided not by them and their doctors, but rather a bunch of elderly men in Government Buildings and Churches.

This action will lead to higher pregnancy rates, especially among the poor, and just as we are seeing in Texas, where while unplanned pregnancy as a whole has been dropping, amongst the poor it has been rising. It will also lead to greater mortality rates amongst women, again as shown in Texas which currently has the highest pregnancy related mortality rate in the developed world.
But it is not just in reproductive rights where women will feel this result. The struggle for equal pay for equivalent work will be lost for many years to come, and a good standard of paid Maternity leave for either parent allowing them to bond with their children before being required to return to work will not be forthcoming.

The next large group to feel this result will be the LGBTQ community.

Say goodbye to marriage equality. Current marriages will be forcibly dissolved and the Constitution amended to enshrine this discrimination.

Speaking of discrimination, following from the North Carolina HB2 Law, expect to see the overturning of Executive Order 13672, the banning of discrimination against LGBTQ by Federal Contractors, and the allowing of discrimination by employers based on Sexual Orientation. The likelihood is that in its place there will be Religious Freedom legislation permitting that use of one's religion to overrule any form of discrimination, allowing those that claim religious reasons to for opposing the LGBTQ community to legally refuse to provide custom or service to them.

Could it be even worse? This depends on how much power Mike Pence has. Pence not only opposed Gay marriage to the point of wanting to make it illegal for gay people to apply for a marriage licence, but also wanted to divert funding for AIDS research into Conversion Theory! He also opposed the repeal of Don't Ask, Don't Tell, so while not an open policy, it could be that Republicans might force Gay military personal out of the Service.

What is well known is that both Trump and Pence have spoken admiringly of Putin, who of course enacted Russia's own Anti-Gay legislation. Similar laws in the US could see public affection or displays made illegal for the LGBTQ community as well as the banning of any such characters on TV programming.

Of course it goes without saying that advances in Transgender Rights over the past few months will be erased with laws such as HB2 forcing Transgender people to out themselves and suffer those consequences, or else suffer other, health, consequences. Or course this is also likely to add to the rise of women who aren't seen as feminine enough being targeted as well.

Let's move on.

What does it mean for people that aren't white?

Trump has called for the reinstatement of the most divisive program in resent US History, Stop and Frisk. This policy treats blacks as criminals and is both discriminatory and dehumanizing. Polls have shown that 70-75% of Blacks oppose Stop and Frisk. This also creates a greater resentment and barrier between the police and the community, at a time when the two groups need to come together and break down the institutionalised racism, not to increase it.

It will also mean that with the Supreme Court supporting them, the GOP will be free to enact greater and stronger Voter Suppression Laws such as those recently overturned in North Carolina

Latinos will suffer many of the same issues, but added to this will be laws such as Arizona's SB 1070 anti-immigrant law where anyone looking like they are Latino could be stopped and have proof of their citizenship demanded.

Even Native Americans are not spared with Trump already having shown his feelings towards them previously, he has now stated that he wants to push the Keystone Pipeline through without regard to cultural heritage or native land rights.

Of course we haven't covered Muslims who would suffer major travel issues and be suspected of being terrorists merely because of their religion. While there is no set methods of dealing with the GOP seems to believe is the "Muslim Problem," early in the campaign Trump was not adverse to the idea of forcing all American Muslims to register.

Of course it doesn't stop at Minorities who will feel this.

The Environment will pay the cost as Trump has plans to dismantle the EPA. Not to mention Climate Change research funding and the Paris Accord both being threatened by a party that doesn't believe in Climate Change.

Anyone addicted to eating safe food might be in danger too, as He goes after the FDA

With the NRA behind him, prepare to have all gun safety legislation gutted along with the BAFTE, or maybe just get rid of it altogether.

There will be food taken off the poor with the Republicans now free to cut the Federal Food Stamp program by $23 billion and the School Lunches Program.

I did have a bunch of stuff that would affect the way things are with the US overseas, but if I carry in I'll be here forever, so final one...

The stripping of protections for a Constitutionally Protected Free Media. Trump wants to make it easier to sue the media weakening Free Speech and making it harder for the Media to publish anything that would be disagreeable to those wealthy enough to cost them bigly in court even if what they printed was true. This attack would make it too easy to tie up media organisations in court long enough to make it too costly to publish controversial things about the rich and litigant powers that be even if what was published was true and in the public interest.

Yes I know this list isn't exclusive, that would have made it way too long.
 
Last edited:
If you pay attention to the news then it's well known that the Republican Party, assuming they keep their word, want to roll back the clock and so now the USA is about to regress several decades as they dismantle the social programs that Democrats have fought hard for since the 1960's.
.
Given that it was Republican support that got the Civil Rights act through, I think your article, while interesting, begins with a number of false assumptions. I still think that the GOP is in the process of self destructing, as the Whigs did in the 19th century, and Trump's success is another crack in the foundation.
 
Thank you both for the substantive replies to a well researched OP that supplied ample evidence of why these thing would be attempted by the new administration.

It's predictive. As you say, "attempted". Too many ifs to get panties in a twist at this early stage. It isn't skeptical, it's just critical of a lot of things that have little chance of passing legislation, that haven't, and probably won't, happen.

In my humble opinion.

Good of you to comment, though.
 
Umm, you do realize that Mitt Romney had a higher percentage of the "white vote" in 2012? Try again........Chris B.
 
Thank you both for the substantive replies to a well researched OP that supplied ample evidence of why these thing would be attempted by the new administration.

Some of that will never see the light of day. I guarantee you the Libel law will die a quick death,if Donnie actually tries to get it passed.
 
It's predictive. As you say, "attempted". Too many ifs to get panties in a twist at this early stage. It isn't skeptical, it's just critical of a lot of things that have little chance of passing legislation, that haven't, and probably won't, happen.

In my humble opinion.

Good of you to comment, though.

What don't you think will pass?

The first thing they intend to do is repeal the ACA, will that not pass?

They have repeatedly attempted to defund Planned Parenthood, will this not happen now they have full control?

HB2 and SB 1070 both passed in their respective states, as did Texas' Senate Bill 5. With the Supreme Court set up to overturn same sex marriage and Roe vs Wade, why do you believe that they would not uphold these laws? (Thankfully the current SCotUS struck down Senate Bill 5, but not before it has had a catastrophic effect on young Texas women.)

Overturning Executive Order 13672 or the Directive to the Department on Education on Transgender Rights is as simple as a stroke of the pen.

Yes, some things I commented on were a stretch, but were noted as such, however Voter suppression laws are real and if not blocked by the SCotUS because they side with the Right, who will be able to stop such laws being implemented Nationally?

So again I ask you, what do you think they won't get through?
 
Say goodbye to marriage equality. Current marriages will be forcibly dissolved and the Constitution amended to enshrine this discrimination.
DT can't amend the constitution. He doesn't have enough votes in Congress - let alone the states.

Although he can stack the SC and change the constitution that way, he can only do so one at a time and my understanding is that he wants less judicial activism in the SC - not more.
 
DT can't amend the constitution. He doesn't have enough votes in Congress - let alone the states.

Although he can stack the SC and change the constitution that way, he can only do so one at a time and my understanding is that he wants less judicial activism in the SC - not more.

If you read the link it's the Repubican Party that wants to change the Constitution, but yeah.

the platform rejects the Obergefell decision and calls for “judicial reconsideration or a constitutional amendment returning control over marriage to states.”

“Our laws and our government’s regulations should recognize marriage as the union of one man and one woman and actively promote married family life as the basis of a stable and prosperous society,” the platform reportedly says.
 
Cool story, bro.

It's predictive. As you say, "attempted". Too many ifs to get panties in a twist at this early stage. It isn't skeptical, it's just critical of a lot of things that have little chance of passing legislation, that haven't, and probably won't, happen.

In my humble opinion.

Good of you to comment, though.

See, I don't think you understand 'cool story bro' then. It's said when you think something is completely made up. The OP isn't, and has cited why they believe those things will be attempted. Saying 'cool story bro' means you don't think they will be, but then you clarification acts as if we were supposed to infer that from your original comment? Why?

And why don't you think being critical of those things is skeptical?
 
Donald can't do everything he says he can, and don't assume his electorate actually cares that much about some of this stuff. Also I hope factions and rivalries and enemies emerge as a bunch of House members haggle over what to put in budgets and stuff. The "wall" is one big giant pork-barrel project, but that doesn't really help the Midwest, for example.

In my state voters chose Trump. They also chose to raise the minimum wage to $10 (from about $8). Is there a coherent message there? People who voted for Trump don't automatically support everything he wants to do, and he wouldn't be able to do it instantly, anyway. The last thing he needs is a bunch of baby boomers screaming at him for making them uninsurable. We'll see what his "something better" than Obamacare looks like.
 
Donald can't do everything he says he can, and don't assume his electorate actually cares that much about some of this stuff. Also I hope factions and rivalries and enemies emerge as a bunch of House members haggle over what to put in budgets and stuff. The "wall" is one big giant pork-barrel project, but that doesn't really help the Midwest, for example.

I'm less worried about what Donald wants to do as to what the Republicans want to do and Donald is willing to sign into Law, though a few of the things are on him, such as revoking Obama's Executive Orders.

In my state voters chose Trump. They also chose to raise the minimum wage to $10 (from about $8). Is there a coherent message there? People who voted for Trump don't automatically support everything he wants to do, and he wouldn't be able to do it instantly, anyway. The last thing he needs is a bunch of baby boomers screaming at him for making them uninsurable. We'll see what his "something better" than Obamacare looks like.

The Minimum Wage is a poor one to use as when the wash come in, he actually supports a $10 minimum wage.
 
See, I don't think you understand 'cool story bro' then. It's said when you think something is completely made up. The OP isn't, and has cited why they believe those things will be attempted. Saying 'cool story bro' means you don't think they will be, but then you clarification acts as if we were supposed to infer that from your original comment? Why?

And why don't you think being critical of those things is skeptical?

Gee you waste a lot of effort chastising people. I doubt I'd have even commented after my one line, had you not felt the need to express your dislike of a throwaway comment.

I'm using colloquial language incorrectly now? :rolleyes:
 
I'm less worried about what Donald wants to do as to what the Republicans want to do and Donald is willing to sign into Law, though a few of the things are on him, such as revoking Obama's Executive Orders.
He'll make a show of that but I noticed him dodging on deportations when he promised to go after "criminal illegal immigrants" - which Obama has been doing anyway.

I wonder if he'll give a hoot about details of any legislation.

The Minimum Wage is a poor one to use as when the wash come in, he actually supports a $10 minimum wage.
I did not know that.
 
I did not know that.

Me either. I actually had "No Federal Minimum Wage" on my list, but when I was researching for a link I discovered that it was one of the things he flip flopped on. He started out with No Federal Minimum Wage but that States should set it to $10, but ended up with a Federal raise to $10 Dollars though he'd prefer to see the States take the initiative rather than them waiting for the Federal increase. So we'll give him that one.
 
Trump bashing at this stage makes as much sense as the B.S. Peace Prize for Obama before he took office.
 

Back
Top Bottom