zero point field and unexplained phenomena?

Till I would hate to present a false picture or offer inaccurate analysis of this phenomenon because of the epistemological breakdown in my mind....

That was trite and undeserved
 
TillEulenspiegel said:
Till I would hate to present a false picture or offer inaccurate analysis of this phenomenon because of the epistemological breakdown in my mind....

That was trite and undeserved
Click to expand...

Wasnt meant to be trite at all - I should have used a smiley, sorry.

I just thought your point 4 (suitably adapted) was a pretty good description of the fear I have when proferring opinions on QM -- although my breakdown is more along the lines of not even being sure what I want from ontological underpinnings.
 
Pardon , pardon ...Thought you were being satirical at my expence:)

Edit to add:
Do have a question for you tho. Do you have to self-censor because of your employment?
 
TillEulenspiegel said:
Pardon , pardon ...Thought you were being satirical at my expence:)

Edit to add:
Do have a question for you tho. Do you have to self-censor because of your employment?
Click to expand...

Not really. I certainly wouldn't mention any new results on here until I had at least presented them at a conference. When I was at Bell Labs there was an internal document review system, and you had to wait a few days before your document was "released" into the wild. Once or twice some patent lawyer tried to get me to write a patent for some idea or another - but realistically the small amount of potentially useful stuff I do is not going to actually be useful until long after any patents expire (and the money you get for writing them aint worth the time)...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom