Youtube truther comments

Miragememories said:
It sounds like Abandon All Hope.

MM
Click to expand...

I couldn't agree more, AAH is also full of comments from truthers avoiding questions, going of topic and claiming to be engineers.

If you have been following the yt comments you will know what I am talking about.
 
Currently I got a truther telling me I am a loser because I respond to posts within a few minutes by responding to my posts within a few minutes. Pure gold.
 
Spanx said:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=CqSriVVgBhQ&feature=youtube

Wtf is this about.

LMFAO this is sad attention seeking, talk about giving the truth movement a bad name.

You can get excited now. You view count will go up. 174 views in just over 2 years.
Click to expand...

Lol, now our super truther Thomas Lewis has got to MM's message board and is obviously spamming anywhere Oystein has posted.

I still haven't seen him post a sensible comment and all he wants is thumbs up's and likes.

Perhaps even MM would agree Thomas Lewis is a troll ?

At least MM's view count is going up and that's all that matters on YouTube :D

Forgot to mention I have seen a truthers name address and telephone numbers posted on a message board. How long before Thomas's details are there for all to see.
 
Last edited:
ozeco41 said:
(My emphasis)
Burden of proof is IMO the central procedural error in all the debates on these forums.

It must be AFAICS because there has never been a coherent claim to prima facie standard put forwards by any truther. i.e. the prima facie standard of "it is worthy of a response". There may be the odd exception but claims are (appear to be) universally "Here is an anomaly that I cannot explain THEREFORE you debunkers prove it is wrong.

And even that comes in two versions viz:
1) Prove the anomaly wrong - which isn't all that serious; OR
2) Prove that the "big question" is wrong because I identified an anolmaly that I cannot explain - whether that "big question" is CD or No plane or....whatever.

And usually the "reversed burden of proof" is backed up by the false dilemma - "If you cannot prove me wrong I must be right!"

[/end adrenaline boost] :o
Click to expand...

One particularly stupid specimen I deal with on another forum states that the burden of proof is on me to prove the official story, as she doesn't believe it. Just one of the many evasive tactics she employs.
 
HotRodDeluxe said:
One particularly stupid specimen I deal with on another forum states that the burden of proof is on me to prove the official story, as she doesn't believe it. Just one of the many evasive tactics she employs.
Click to expand...
Put crudely it can be hard to know where stupid ends and dishonesty begins. "Their" limitations appear as soon as you try to pin them down on anything - doesn't have to be "conclusions" - more often it comes much earlier when you try to get "them" to define WTF they are talking about.

And, with a lot of these people, there is probably a fair bit of genuine ignorance of the basics of debate PLUS simple inability to follow a process of reasoned thinking.

They get by in normal day to day activities because there is nothing complicated to reveal their intellectual limitations and/or limitations of integrity. But dealing with the complex issues of 9/11 and up against clear thinking people their limits are soon exposed. Hence the censorship that lots of "truth" sites rely on.
 
Last edited:
HotRodDeluxe said:
One particularly stupid specimen I deal with on another forum states that the burden of proof is on me to prove the official story, as she doesn't believe it. Just one of the many evasive tactics she employs.
Click to expand...

Maybe the worst thing they do is claim the NIST report is all lies or wrong... and then when you engage them on it it becomes clear they have never even seen the damn thing.

I haven't read every page but I've spent more than a few hours perusing it and it's thorough and informative.

Honestly all you should have to do is watch a few minutes of the videos of the initiation of collapse of each tower, including the bulging of the outer columns, and then watch that upper mass pound its way to the ground- then watch a video of a controlled demolition.

This is why the NIST report stated there was no need to search for explosive residue. Hell there was no need to do a damn study, it was obvious what happened. A floor fails and momentum takes over. The mass of each building suspended against gravity had the stored energy of a Hiroshima bomb.

Sorry I'm ranting I just don't get where these peoples' heads are. Oh yeah, screwed in the fudgesocket, fully torqued.
 
I have noticed that MM's view count is up a little with a peach of a comment on the top.

I have also noticed that ae911 are kind of celebrating getting close to a million views on one of their videos. They only have 10000 likes though.

It's got me wondering whether they are buying views of eBay ? I personally wouldn't put it past them, however I could be wrong, but the more I keep seeing yt truther saying they are many in numbers the less I can find. It seems to be the same few spamming.
 
Spanx said:
I have noticed that MM's view count is up a little with a peach of a comment on the top.

I have also noticed that ae911 are kind of celebrating getting close to a million views on one of their videos. They only have 10000 likes though.

It's got me wondering whether they are buying views of eBay ? I personally wouldn't put it past them, however I could be wrong, but the more I keep seeing yt truther saying they are many in numbers the less I can find. It seems to be the same few spamming.
Click to expand...

Reminds me, the other day, someone on Youtube said that 80% of Americans believe the US government was behind 9/11. :D

I'm glad to hear that they're not extending beyond their reach though; that they're all high-fiving and congratulating each other because of the number of views on a Youtube video. They might not ever achieve that elusive publication in a legitimate scientific journal, but give them another decade and some luck, and just maaaaybe they might be 1/100th as notable as "Gangam Style" or "Charlie Bit My Finger."

But knowing 9/11 truth, they'll probably fail at that too.
 
freud said:
Reminds me, the other day, someone on Youtube said that 80% of Americans believe the US government was behind 9/11. :D

I'm glad to hear that they're not extending beyond their reach though; that they're all high-fiving and congratulating each other because of the number of views on a Youtube video. They might not ever achieve that elusive publication in a legitimate scientific journal, but give them another decade and some luck, and just maaaaybe they might be 1/100th as notable as "Gangam Style" or "Charlie Bit My Finger."

But knowing 9/11 truth, they'll probably fail at that too.
Click to expand...

Lol 80%, yet I'm sure truthers believe it.

The following clip started 5th dec 12. It show what a fail ae911 is :D

www.youtube.com/watch?v=LX153eYcVrY&feature

I get the feeling ae911 truth consists of a few thousand world wide and a couple of dozen ae911 yt trolls.

I also get the feeling this is the final push before the end of ae911 hence the new subscription scam.

I'm happy for any truther to show me I am wrong but unfortunately I will require evidence :D
 
Last edited:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=LSDfbm8OhCg&feature=youtube

Thought I would add this, more comments from the super truther thomas Lewis :D

I get the feeling he will be along soon ? Somebody has made him aware of this thread.

So be aware all you hired trolls :D you may have to earn your money, this guy has a degree in engineering and he knows more than you will ever know :D
 
batvette said:
Maybe the worst thing they do is claim the NIST report is all lies or wrong... and then when you engage them on it it becomes clear they have never even seen the damn thing.

I haven't read every page but I've spent more than a few hours perusing it and it's thorough and informative.

Honestly all you should have to do is watch a few minutes of the videos of the initiation of collapse of each tower, including the bulging of the outer columns, and then watch that upper mass pound its way to the ground- then watch a video of a controlled demolition.

This is why the NIST report stated there was no need to search for explosive residue. Hell there was no need to do a damn study, it was obvious what happened. A floor fails and momentum takes over. The mass of each building suspended against gravity had the stored energy of a Hiroshima bomb.

Sorry I'm ranting I just don't get where these peoples' heads are. Oh yeah, screwed in the fudgesocket, fully torqued.
Click to expand...

I'd like to point out that bomb-sniffing dogs were used, and still found nothing.
 
www.youtube.com/watch?v=BVFZu97fWbU&feature=youtube

LMFAO ae911 celebrate almost a million views and thomas Lewis claims that more than half the world believes in an inside job :D

I wonder what world he lives in ?

Maybe I should stop stalking a stalker. I still have not seen him come out with a sensible comment yet.
 
Last edited:
Brass said:
Typical truther. Says the FDNY aren't liars, but rather that their accounts are false. What defines a "liar" in the world of truthism anyway?
Click to expand...
Interesting question, but easy to answer from what I've experienced: anybody who disagrees with a truther's personal definition of DA TROOF can easily be labeled as a liar and/or disinfo agent.
 
freud said:
Interesting question, but easy to answer from what I've experienced: anybody who disagrees with a truther's personal definition of DA TROOF can easily be labeled as a liar and/or disinfo agent.
Click to expand...

I love when people say I'm paid to do this. Gee, I get paid to troll internet message boards and couldn't at least have had the government settle my student loan debt for me? Wow, I'm dumb! :rolleyes:
 
000063 said:
I'd like to point out that bomb-sniffing dogs were used, and still found nothing.
Click to expand...

Ah but those dogs were not trained for the super secret high tech nanohooey that the government must have developed.

You do realize that government war machine technology progresses at an exponentially increased rate over the private sector currently estimated to allow top CIA spooks to converse on what will someday be the iphone9000?

How about that "they carted off all the steel to China" myth? Yeah they sold a lot but didn't they catalog, photograph and store it in warehouses first- handled by thousands of workers in the pile? And wouldn't China of all people love to produce evidence if there was some in the steel? Us going into Iraq denied them lucrative oil contracts with Saddam.

Anyway about that "pile" Remember Dr Judy Wood and her premise there was not enough debris so the towers were dustified?

One link 1000 words:

wtc-5277.jpg


How big do we want our pile to be?

(it's actually not that big.... or is it? Maybe it's the angle.)
 
cjnewson88 said:
Youtube truthers. I've dealt with so many over the years that I can honestly conclude they are the biggest group of total wacko's out there. Total thorough going idiots. No more. They sit on youtube searching out anything 9/11, and spraying it with their spammed rhetoric. You can show them the answers to all the claims, and they dismiss it as fake, staged, wrong, lies, etc. Total morons. You want to see some interesting threads? Have a look at some of the comments on my '9/11 conspiracy road trip' upload.
Click to expand...

Lol, I see the super truther found you.

Are you going to invite him over ? I'm suprised that with his super powers, he hasn't found this tread :D I guess he doesn't read his message board :confused:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom