• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Yet another overunity machine

xterra

So far, so good...
xterra
Joined
Apr 7, 2012
Messages
4,269
Location
On the outskirts of Nowhere
Is that even english?

In any case you really have to admire free energy proponents for their persistence if for no other reason.
 
"Prana" is the same stuff as "chi" or "qi." In other words, imaginary magic life energy.

Fred
 
shemp said:
This thing must be destroyed before it sucks all the prana from the universe and kills everyone!!!
Click to expand...

Quote

"The design uses the same types of materials used in current generators, but the magnetic circuit within the machine is configured to cancel back torque while inducing current and producing power. This might be compared to the rearrangement of materials by the Wright Brothers"

Designed to deceive, Charlatans at work!
 
As always watch what they do, not what they say. Their words assure us the machine can power whole countries, but in action it has serious trouble with a 1.5 v dry cell. This kind of "machine" has been peddled a million times before and it's never worked out. Which is the largest clue of all. If this particular prana-qi-woo collector really does defy the laws of physics and "works out", I'm sure we'll know about it. :)
 
A Reactionless AC Synchronous Generator (RLG) has been invented by Paramahamsa Tewari, electrical engineer and former Executive Director of Nuclear Power Corporation of India. His background includes engineering project management for construction of nuclear power stations. The efficiency of models he has built, which have also been independently built and tested, is as high as 250%.
Click to expand...
My bold. Remind me to stay out of the vicinity of nuke plants in India.
 
Questions I would ask of over unity or free energy inventors:

  • What are the variables that affect efficiency?
  • What is the theoretical limit on efficiency?
  • What are the variables that affect output torque?
  • How are these values expressed or calculated mathematically?
 
Does the machine produce noise, vibration, or heat? What does this mean with respect to efficiency?
 
Biscuit said:
What's the pay off for the proponents?
Click to expand...

The usual formula is:
1. announce your breakthrough discovery
2. Form a company with yourself as CEO
3. Advertise for suckers investors, draw salary and expenses from the funds invested.
4. Announce a breakthrough, such that device will be in full production real soon.
5. Go to 3.
 
CORed said:
The usual formula is:
1. announce your breakthrough discovery
2. Form a company with yourself as CEO
3. Advertise for suckers investors, draw salary and expenses from the funds invested.
4. Announce a breakthrough, such that device will be in full production real soon.
5. Go to 3.
Click to expand...

Steorn comes to mind for that. What was it ? 22 million pound in total they drew from investor, paid a gigantic salary to a lot of people especially sean mccarthy, CEO of previous company which failed *badly* up to the point he wrecked an expansive sport auto and did not seem to care. And yet they still "exists" and pretend to have epha-heat or something to sell. At some point they sold instrument to suckers to measure their over unity gizmo ... The good time. Some idiot are still thinking they will have something to offer.... Gee.
 
Olowkow said:
  • Could this noise, vibration and heat be harvested to increase output efficiency?:D
Click to expand...

At one point a dewy-eyed Steorn supporter suggested that you should measure all those items (vibration, heat loss) as part of the proof that they'd achieved OU. I think it went into a nine post discussion of the merits before someone who'd seen two episodes of Mr. Wizard finally said, "Say, What??!!"
 
CORed said:
The usual formula is:
1. announce your breakthrough discovery
2. Form a company with yourself as CEO
3. Advertise for suckers investors, draw salary and expenses from the funds invested.
4. Announce a breakthrough, such that device will be in full production real soon.
5. Go to 3.
Click to expand...
Right back to 1874 and John Ernst Worrell Keely with his ‘induction resonance motion motor’.
 
Olowkow said:
  • Could this noise, vibration and heat be harvested to increase output efficiency?:D
Click to expand...

Often it, mathematically at least, is. Which is to say that you count and treat that energy as extraneous, an extra (a plus as opposed to a minus) added to the energy you put into the system. Thus you end up claiming to have efficiency "as high as 250%". If only the math was in any way efficient.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom