WTC7 video (new?)

[Quad4_72]

Comment highlight: manwello15: Small fires, big fires it does not matter. Fire does not bring down buildings. There was never a building that collapsed do to fire in the history of of steel framed buildings prior to 9/11 and even after 9/11. So don't BS me and try to say fire caused the buildings to fail.
Total BS and it goes against science.

What other buildings have had two massive jets crashed into them loaded with fuel traveling at the speed of a bullet? Oh you forgot that part huh...

 

[T.A.M.]

when we are hurling the sarcasm, lets make sure it is at manwello15, the youtube poster who Sylvan quoted, and not at Sylvan.

TAM

 

[leftysergeant]

I can see why few twoofers link to this. I has the actual sounds of the collapse. Doesn't it sound an awful lot like the Balzac-Vitry demolition?

Of course, it could not have been demolished by that method, either, because the pre-weakening would have been much more extensive, labor-intensive and bloody obvious to a casual observer.

 

[triforcharity]

My bad, my bad. PLEASE forgive me sylvan!! I'M NOT WORTHY!! I'M NOT WORTHY!!!


Anyway, bigbird.

You are absolutely welcome. Feel free to ask questions all you like. I don't mind, for the most part. Except for the falling bodies. I don't want to discuss that!

 

[LashL]

sylvan,

If you are quoting someone else, particularly at another site, please link to what you are quoting and/or use the quote function, so that it is clear in your posts the parts that are someone else's words that you are citing and the parts that are your own words. That will go a long way to avoiding confusion, and will go a long way to ensuring that your own words are clearly distinct from those of a conspiracy fantasist.

 

[Cl1mh4224rd]

This is how I read sylvan8798's comment:

Comment highlight:

Small fires, big fires it does not matter. Fire does not bring down buildings. There was never a building that collapsed do to fire in the history of of steel framed buildings prior to 9/11 and even after 9/11. So don't BS me and try to say fire caused the buildings to fail.
Total BS and it goes against science.

ETA: I think the comment may have been deleted, because I can't find it to confirm...

 

[Justin39640]

sylvan,

If you are quoting someone else, particularly at another site, please link to what you are quoting and/or use the quote function, so that it is clear in your posts the parts that are someone else's words that you are citing and the parts that are your own words. That will go a long way to avoiding confusion, and will go a long way to ensuring that your own words are clearly distinct from those of a conspiracy fantasist.

it was from the YT comments in the video in my op

i do agree quoting like that looks confusing

here ill fix it for him

Comment highlight:

Small fires, big fires it does not matter. Fire does not bring down buildings. There was never a building that collapsed do to fire in the history of of steel framed buildings prior to 9/11 and even after 9/11. So don't BS me and try to say fire caused the buildings to fail.
Total BS and it goes against science.

 

[Justin39640]

This is how I read sylvan8798's comment:

damn beat me to it and did a better job
lol

 

[Grizzly Bear]

This is how I read sylvan8798's comment:




ETA: I think the comment may have been deleted, because I can't find it to confirm...

Either that or it got buried behind the pages... youtube's comment system isn't exactly all that clean....

 

[Justin39640]

Either that or it got buried behind the pages... youtube's comment system isn't exactly all that clean....

http://www.youtube.com/user/manwello15
id say he fits the MO

 

[OneRedEye]

Secondly, I saaw the bulge in WTC 7 on 9/11.

You saw the bulge? (Duh, that's what you just said)

Can you describe the bulge in more detail? Where was it located, how extensive an area did it cover, what was the approximate deflection, did it change significantly over time? Were you in contact with anyone involved in the transit measurements? Time frames? I would be grateful for anything you can answer, or otherwise elaborate on. Even third-hand chatter is potentially useful. Thanks in advance.

 

[Justin39640]

I dunno the area well enough to ID that building as WTC7 but it has the same exterior and looks like WTC7...and it certainly is on fire...

TAM

when he was in the lobby of the building he was on barklay st looking south down washington st, the west side of WTC7 on the left the verizon bldg on the right

the second shot he was on the corner of west broadway and barklay
right in front of the ill fated yet seldom mentioned (at least by truthers) 30 west broadway, aka Fiterman Hall

heres a map
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1e/WTC_Building_Arrangement_and_Site_Plan.svg

where he was standing on W bway was completely covered in debris from 7
if that gives any scope of "into its own footprint"

 

[T.A.M.]

My bad, my bad. PLEASE forgive me sylvan!! I'M NOT WORTHY!! I'M NOT WORTHY!!!


Anyway, bigbird.

You are absolutely welcome. Feel free to ask questions all you like. I don't mind, for the most part. Except for the falling bodies. I don't want to discuss that!

heh man, just trying to keep the infighting (especially infighting that is over an incorrect assumption) to a minimum.

You may find now that it has become known that you were a rescue worker (fireman?) on 9/11, that you may be asked a tonne of related questions.

TAM

 

[chillzero]

BTW, I was near that very intersection, and most likely saaw those cars burning. But, however, I was on a rescue crew, so I didn't do much firefighting that day. Heck, I don't think I even picked up a hose untill late that afternoon, maybe even early evening.

You mean you don't remember every single detail of everything you did that day, timed to the very minute, if not second?????

With talk like that you'll be providing people like magi5 with their smoking gun fodder (and it seems that OneRedEye is putting in the advance party).


In seriousness, though ... congrats on and thanks for doing a job I doubt I could ever do.

 

[Quad4_72]

sylvan,

If you are quoting someone else, particularly at another site, please link to what you are quoting and/or use the quote function, so that it is clear in your posts the parts that are someone else's words that you are citing and the parts that are your own words. That will go a long way to avoiding confusion, and will go a long way to ensuring that your own words are clearly distinct from those of a conspiracy fantasist.

Yes this would help. My apologies for the confusion sylvan. My previous comment applies to the poster you quoted.

 

[Justin39640]

heres one of those contrasts
the video in this thread
was posted 3 days ago
and almost has more hits that the video above

 

[sylvan8798]

Sylvan,

Than WHY does NYC BC (New York City Building Codes) REQUIRE it on exposed steel in highrises??? So that they have something else to do?? So that they don't get bored??

Steel weakens at 50% of its melting point, or around 1100 degrees. Secondly, I saaw the bulge in WTC 7 on 9/11. How did it get there?? A fat girl leaning on the exterrior walls??? Come on, don't bring stupid stuff to the table.

Chill, dearie. I'm quoting the stupid comments from the youtube video about building 7. I'm an engineer, and have frequently asked this question of ct believers about the fireproofing. Not only required in highrises but in many small buildings as well, depending on their usage. Of course I am repeatedly ignored, since ct's can't answer these questions.

 

[sylvan8798]

when we are hurling the sarcasm, lets make sure it is at manwello15, the youtube poster who Sylvan quoted, and not at Sylvan.

TAM

Thanks TAM

I'll make sure to make that distinction clearer in the future.

 

[triforcharity]

heh man, just trying to keep the infighting (especially infighting that is over an incorrect assumption) to a minimum.

You may find now that it has become known that you were a rescue worker (fireman?) on 9/11, that you may be asked a tonne of related questions.

TAM

I don't mind the questions, but limited and not too detailed. Even still to this day, I get choked up. My wife want's me to talk to her abou ti sometimes. She lived in VA at the time, and we were just dating. Its difficult, Even with her. But, like I said, I don't mind. I just have to be VERY clear as to what I say. And yes, I was a firefighter, but, like I have said earlier, I didn't do much firefighting that day.

The ONLY thing I won't talk about is the jumpers. That's off limits. Other than that, I don't mind.

 

[alienentity]

I don't mind the questions, but limited and not too detailed. Even still to this day, I get choked up. My wife want's me to talk to her abou ti sometimes. She lived in VA at the time, and we were just dating. Its difficult, Even with her. But, like I said, I don't mind. I just have to be VERY clear as to what I say. And yes, I was a firefighter, but, like I have said earlier, I didn't do much firefighting that day.

The ONLY thing I won't talk about is the jumpers. That's off limits. Other than that, I don't mind.

Must say, I'm very glad you're participating on this forum. Thanks.