• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

WTC7 Truthers explain this "wake vortex" effect

1337m4n

Alphanumeric Anonymous Stick Man
1337m4n
Joined
May 10, 2007
Messages
3,510
Truther: There are no pictures of WTC7 on fire! That proves that it wasn't on fire!

Rational person: *picture of intense smoke clearly pouring out of almost every floor of WTC7*

Truther: Aha! There's no fire in this picture! Everybody knows that 100% of the smoke came from Buildings 5 and 6! [ETA: Where are the pictures of fire in Buildings 5 and 6? Double standard much?] Wake Vortex!




Excuse me for thinking that this makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. WTC7 was MUCH taller than 5 or 6, first of all, yet we see EVERY floor of 7 smoking, not just the lower ones.

But just in case we're all mistaken, here's a chance for Truthers to explain this "wake vortex" effect. In detail, and in layman's terms.

First, allow me to set the stage with two diagrams:

Here is the layout of the World Trade Center complex

wtc_plan.png



With regards to the above picture, here is the direction the wind was blowing that day

Down-arrow.gif


Go ahead, Truthers. I'm waiting for your explanation of this magic.

(Note to lurkers: I am well aware that wake vortex is an aeronautical term. The Truthers, however, are not aware of this, which is why it would appear that I have used the term incorrectly in this thread.)
 
Last edited:
Im sure this is another one of those arguments like a "pyroclastic flow" at the WTC.

If anyone is familiar with the airbus a320 I believe it was that crashed into a neighborhood in NYC a month of so after 9/11, that is a perfect example of a wake vortex.
 
And strangely this thread sits empty while JHarrow, the CTer who brought this term into the discussion to begin with, goes on making taunting and pointless posts in another thread.

The NWO must be quaking in its boots.
 
Is this a wake as in funeral for the twoof movement? Sure seems like it.

Just when I think they can't get any stupider, they prove me wrong.
 
I'm sure Uranium powered space beams, or Tachyons, can explain it.
 
I was hope The Trinity might have a go. He’s read relevant material, after all. (Oh, yes!)
 
Jonnyclueless said:
I'm not sure, but I think it involves a Flux Capacitor.
Click to expand...

The steel was special red-iron positronic steel that melted/dustified when hit with the voltage spike from the Flux Capacitor.

This was all built into the building along with the c4 on the 3" rebars on 4" foot centers.

The Capacitors looked just like transformers so no one noticed.
 
beachnut said:
What is telling about the size of the fires is the SMOKE! Look at photos of smoke from the WTC in the afternoon, and you see how big the fires were in WTC7.
Click to expand...

Obviously you ave bought into the "fire/smoke" scenario so love by official shills thre are many other sourcs of smoke remembeer this was before cigerrates were not socially approved. lol

Parody alert.
 
dup I blame Lisa tho it really was the cat
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom