arthwollipot
Observer of Phenomena, Pronouns: he/him
So it's arguably a hate crime.So, what?
So it's arguably a hate crime.So, what?
Only if you criminalize hate.So it's arguably a hate crime.
It should be compulsory, right?Only if you criminalize hate.
My goodness. I remember - you probably to do, too - all the times that atheists/agnostics purposely and intentionally ridiculed Christianity. So the Christians of the past should have been more homicidal? Then blasphemy laws would be okay? The Left's embrace of Islam is both ridiculous and frightening.So it's arguably a hate crime.
Also imaginary.The Left's embrace of Islam is both ridiculous and frightening.
Art just wrote that it'd be a hate crime to ridicule Islam. On a "skeptics" forum. He wrote that.Also imaginary.
Can you quote it, or is it something else you've imagined?Art just wrote that it'd be a hate crime to ridicule Islam. On a "skeptics" forum. He wrote that.
Oh, gawd. It this that lefty tactic where you pretend that you do not understand or can't read?Can you quote it, or is it something else you've imagined?
No, I'm asking you to quote the post.Oh, gawd. It this that lefty tactic where you pretend that you do not understand or can't read?
Ah, the statist totalitarian solution: Everything that isn't banned must be made compulsory.It should be compulsory, right?
So it's arguably a hate crime.
Christians do not have a documented history of perpetuating violence against people who burn their holy book. Muslims do. It's a pretty reliable pattern.My goodness. I remember - you probably to do, too - all the times that atheists/agnostics purposely and intentionally ridiculed Christianity. So the Christians of the past should have been more homicidal? Then blasphemy laws would be okay? The Left's embrace of Islam is both ridiculous and frightening.
I did not. I said nothing about "ridicule". I said that it is arguably a hate crime to burn a Quran. You should not be saying that I'm saying things that I'm not saying.Art just wrote that it'd be a hate crime to ridicule Islam. On a "skeptics" forum. He wrote that.
#2,261No, I'm asking you to quote the post.
Christians do not have a documented history of perpetuating violence against people who burn their holy book. Muslims do. It's a pretty reliable pattern.
I did not. I said nothing about "ridicule". I said that it is arguably a hate crime to burn a Quran. You should not be saying that I'm saying things that I'm not saying.
All religions are not the same. Muslims have a documented history of perpetuating violence against people who burn the Quran. You can't say the same of Christians.Ugh. It doesn't matter the religion.
It has indeed been argued such. Did Christians perpetuate violence against the person who did that?It's arguably a hate crime to put a crucifix in a bottle urine, right?
What do the two things have to do with each other? It's not a hate crime if it doesn't provoke a violent response? Christians have moral agency and Muslims don't?All religions are not the same. Muslims have a documented history of perpetuating violence against people who burn the Quran. You can't say the same of Christians.
It has indeed been argued such. Did Christians perpetuate violence against the person who did that?
I don't disagree that muslims have a well-documented history of violence against non-believers in their religion as well as anyone who doesn't show proper deference and respect for their religion.All religions are not the same. Muslims have a documented history of perpetuating violence against people who burn the Quran. You can't say the same of Christians.
It has indeed been argued such. Did Christians perpetuate violence against the person who did that?
Is that like an excuse? You're excusing the bad behavior?All religions are not the same. Muslims have a documented history of perpetuating violence against people who burn the Quran. You can't say the same of Christians.
No. This happened in the US of A several decades ago when evangelicals had much more power/influence.It has indeed been argued such. Did Christians perpetuate violence against the person who did that?
Nothing.What do the two things have to do with each other?
Which is why it is not a good analogy.No. This happened in the US of A several decades ago when evangelicals had much more power/influence.
It's worse than that. He actually said that the fact that somebody knows that burning the Quran is likely to provoke a violent response is what makes burning the Quran arguably a hate crime.Art just wrote that it'd be a hate crime to ridicule Islam. On a "skeptics" forum. He wrote that.
No, I'm asking you to quote the post.