World War Three Coming Soon?

In '03, we had a president itching to invade Iraq, Hussien was defying the UN order for inspections, and we were still pissed about 9/11.

in '10, we have a President that has shown no inclination for invading Iran, a US population more worried about the flushed economy, a military that is stretched too thin with leaders that don't want to invade Iran

From the article:

More than six in ten think the U.S. should take economic and diplomatic efforts to get Iran to shut down their nuclear program, with only a quarter calling for immediate military action.
Click to expand...

And just out of curiosity, who would be rushing to Iran's side to created the multiple fronts of other continents to make it a World War?
 
IIRC, Europe's much more concerned that Iran gets nukes than the US is, and the US is definitely concerned.
 
One would think Jihad Jane would LOVE WW3 to happen. It would destory modern industrial society, which it pretty apparent by now she Hates, and force us back into a semi Medieval, everybody grows their own food society, which is what she apparenly wants.
Luddites are so much fun......
 
Who decides which wars get numbers?

The situation in Africa since the 1990s has killed more people than World War One.
 
Donal said:
In '03, we had a president itching to invade Iraq, Hussien was defying the UN order for inspections, and we were still pissed about 9/11.

in '10, we have a President that has shown no inclination for invading Iran, a US population more worried about the flushed economy, a military that is stretched too thin with leaders that don't want to invade Iran

From the article:



And just out of curiosity, who would be rushing to Iran's side to created the multiple fronts of other continents to make it a World War?
Click to expand...

It's unlikely that anyone is going to rush, but China and Russia are unlikely to sit back and let the USA own Iran.

The signs are that the idiot US/Israeli fruitcake is more serious about bombing Iran than ever. Violence is the only option the US has to shore up its crumbling, imperial dominance.
 
Last edited:
JihadJane said:
It's unlikely that anyone is going to rush, but China and Russia are unlikely to sit back and let the USA own Iran.

The signs are that the idiot US/Israeli fruitcake is more serious about bombing Iran than ever. Violence is the only option the US has to shore up its crumbling, imperial dominance.
Click to expand...


Well, at least we don't have John "Bomb Bomb Iran" McCain in charge. I hope that if anyone ends up bombing Iran, it isn't us for a change. It's not as if we're the only nation with fighters and bombers. Besides, I'm convinced the time to react to Iran having nukes is after they use one. That might be horrible of me, but I think it's a damned sight less horrible going around acting as if the US and it's official allies are the only nations qualified to have them and assuming anyone else intends to destroy their neighbors.
 
JihadJane said:
It's unlikely that anyone is going to rush, but China and Russia are unlikely to sit back and let the USA own Iran.
Click to expand...

So they will commit their own military forces and stretch out the theater rather than just cut a deal with the US? China and Russia would actually unite?

The signs are that the idiot US/Israeli fruitcake is more serious about bombing Iran than ever.
Click to expand...

Who are you referring to? What makes you think the US has made any more strides to bombing Iran? Obama has stepped back to let the current politcal discourse sort itself out, if anything.

Violence is the only option the US has to shore up its crumbling, imperial dominance.
Click to expand...

No, we just sell you people more crap you don't need. Seriously, go out and buy a BigMac and tell me about or crumbling dominance.
 
Cynic said:
Well, at least we don't have John "Bomb Bomb Iran" McCain in charge. I hope that if anyone ends up bombing Iran, it isn't us for a change. It's not as if we're the only nation with fighters and bombers. Besides, I'm convinced the time to react to Iran having nukes is after they use one. That might be horrible of me, but I think it's a damned sight less horrible going around acting as if the US and it's official allies are the only nations qualified to have them and assuming anyone else intends to destroy their neighbors.
Click to expand...


That is pretty,stupid,IMHO.
 
Donal said:
So they will commit their own military forces and stretch out the theater rather than just cut a deal with the US? China and Russia would actually unite?
Click to expand...


Wouldn't less direct forms assistance be more likely?

China and Russia have already united, having recognized that the US threat to their interests requires a cooperative response. They have staged joint war games.


Who are you referring to?
Click to expand...

The US/UK/Israel alliance.

What makes you think the US has made any more strides to bombing Iran? Obama has stepped back to let the current politcal discourse sort itself out, if anything.
Click to expand...

The propaganda effort.

The administration's talking heads (including Obama) keep telling us that Iran is building a bomb, despite there being no evidence of it.


No, we just sell you people more crap you don't need. Seriously, go out and buy a BigMac and tell me about or crumbling dominance.
Click to expand...

It is the US which has been buying crap, from China.
 
dudalb said:
That is pretty,stupid,IMHO.
Click to expand...


Hey, that didn't sound very humble. ;)

Yeah, I understand that we've been dictating what other countries can and can't do for so long that questioning it sounds dumb. And I understand that we've tried and failed to establish any level of trust with a lot of nations by going back on our word and refusing to trust them for so long, it seems like utter lunacy to try something new. But maybe allowing nations to develop on their own and only punishing them when they've done something wrong is just crazy enough to work.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom