• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

william rodriguez

Docker said:
I have challenged you to explain the rubble and you have not. I asked for an example of fuel causing such damage, none were provided (except a pathetically waek link to bombs on wikipedia)

By the way, using the word "during" twice in one sentence shows the knots I have tied you in.
Click to expand...

Uh oh, said a word twice! How terrible is my argument!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel-air_explosive

And define what kind of rubble. The quote wasn't very clear.
 
Docker said:
So your coming round to my demolition theory.
Click to expand...

OMG, you are totally being a CTer using their tactics
I WAS USING THAT AS A FREAKING EXAMPLE.

Anything heavy colliding with any other object is bound to create debris/rubble.

A CAR CRASHING INTO THE SIDE OF A BUILDING can create rubble.
So are you now going to say that a car caused the buildigns to collapse?
 
Bell said:
If fuel didn't, then what did?
Click to expand...

I don't know and I never claimed to. But we do have a history of car bombs in the wtc basement. Could have even been a simultaneous attack with terrorists in a car below.

Rodriguez said he saw one of the hijackers staking out the trade centre weeks before.
 
Docker said:
I don't know and I never claimed to. But we do have a history of car bombs in the wtc basement. Could have even been a simultaneous attack with terrorists in a car below.

Rodriguez said he saw one of the hijackers staking out the trade centre weeks before.
Click to expand...

Speculating much?
 
Arus808 said:
OMG, you are totally being a CTer using their tactics
I WAS USING THAT AS A FREAKING EXAMPLE.

Anything heavy colliding with any other object is bound to create debris/rubble.

A CAR CRASHING INTO THE SIDE OF A BUILDING can create rubble.
So are you now going to say that a car caused the buildigns to collapse?
Click to expand...

Calm down hun
 
Docker said:
I have challenged you to explain the rubble and you have not. I asked for an example of fuel causing such damage, none were provided (except a pathetically waek link to bombs on wikipedia)
Click to expand...


Pathetically weak? Including a statement that thermobaric weapons are MORE powerful than conventional explosives? Right.

Since you only seem capable of dealing with pretty pictures, watch this.

-Gumboot
 
Docker said:
Show me an example of fuel causing that damage or withdraw your contention.
Click to expand...


So, if you dont believe that fuel (and its fumes) can't cause an explosion (if near heat), then you should tell gas stations to stop using pumps and just keep gas in buckets to fuel peoples cars with.

What the hell do you think happens in engines?

YOU SERIOUSLY need to stop claiming things you have no knowledge about.
 
Docker said:
Yes I'm speculating, based on historical examples in that very builing and the fact that you cannot give me a single example of fuel causing that damage
Click to expand...


How many times do you have to be told that Fuel Air Explosives are MORE powerful than conventional explosives before you begin to understand it? Do you have reading comprehension issues?

-Gumboot
 
Lets not forget that in 1993 the terrorists wanted to bring the buildings down. Is it not possible that they had another cell putting car bombs in the basement to make sure it happened on 9/11?
 
Docker said:
Yes I'm speculating, based on historical examples in that very builing and the fact that you cannot give me a single example of fuel causing that damage
Click to expand...

dont need an exact example .just look at how engines work. multiply that force and energy by thousands of gallons of fuel, and even a 6th grader can the idea.
 
Docker said:
Lets not forget that in 1993 the terrorists wanted to bring the buildings down. Is it not possible that they had another cell putting car bombs in the basement to make sure it happened on 9/11?
Click to expand...


Of course it's possible. There's just no evidence of it.

-Gumboot
 
Docker said:
Yes I'm speculating, based on historical examples in that very builing and the fact that you cannot give me a single example of fuel causing that damage
Click to expand...
False. Fuel explosions caused that damage throughout the elevator areas in the WTC, which you would know if you had bothered to read the eyewitness accounts.
 
Docker said:
Lets not forget that in 1993 the terrorists wanted to bring the buildings down. Is it not possible that they had another cell putting car bombs in the basement to make sure it happened on 9/11?
Click to expand...


You show again, that you do not know what you are talking about.
 
Docker said:
I don't know and I never claimed to. But we do have a history of car bombs in the wtc basement. Could have even been a simultaneous attack with terrorists in a car below.

Rodriguez said he saw one of the hijackers staking out the trade centre weeks before.
Click to expand...

Typical CT. You don't agree with the official explaination, but when asked what did happen, who did it, or how, you all revert to "I don't know"

Convenient, no?

I could ask you "show me an example of a car bomb causing that damage or withdraw your contention" but then you would answer "I never said it was a car bomb"

You CTist are cowards, by not providing any case, but only asking questions. Be a man and stop faqing around, tell us WHAT EXACTLY happened on 9/11.
 
Docker said:
Now your just splitting hairs. Please dont do that, it weakens your already flimsy arguments
Click to expand...

OMG again, you are being obtuse
YOU just stated a FALSE statement.
GRAVY corrected your statement!
Its not splitting hairs!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom