Phrost said:
Thanks. Any ideas why so many self-described skeptics lean left more often than not? Is it a product of the education system (leftists more likely to be teachers/professors, right-ists(?) more likely to be in business)? Is it an affinity with the secularism or revulsion by the counter-intuitive fundamentalist Christian influence on the party of non-governmental interference in people's lives?
I'd think that at the least, most Skeptics would be moderates if not leaning towards a practical Libertarianism. I seriously do not get the attractiveness of Socialism. It penalizes success and subsidizes failure.
I'm not convinced that "most self-described skeptics lean left more often than not." Do you have any statistics to support that? I get the impression that most people who post here are college students who have lots of time. I don't have statistics to support that either, but if it is true, then it may explain why most of the folks here lean to the left. Most people become politically aware in college and most people lean to the left when they first become politically aware. People tend to have more conservative views when they become financially independant, unless they work for or are supported by the government (i.e., teachers, professors that apply for research grants, etc). and have less time to devote to forums (the minority being folks like me who got laid off or have crappy jobs).
Honestly, I know as many Democratic Christians as I do Republican Christians. I think the notion that most Republicans are religious zealots is all propaganda and loaded statistics. It would make more sense to me if most Democrats were Christians, since Jesus was about the most liberal dude that ever lived.
As I understand it, Liberitarians believe in the idea of having less government involvement in people's lives, which I agree with. I have two friends that are Liberitarian. When I asked them what their plan was for running the government on a smaller staff and budget, they didn't have an answer. "Our goal is to get somebody in office. I guess we'll go from there." If the Liberitarians had a clear agenda, then I might consider joining their party. Even then, I would have my doubts, because to my knowledge, none of them have any experience in politics
because they have never held office. A catch 22.
IMO, for the Liberitarians to succeed, they would need to convert a high ranking Democrat or Republican to their party, come up with a realistic plan, and move forward from there. Even if that happens, I would still have my doubts. It's a conflict of interest for a political party to desire less government. It would be like a fish asking for less water. I seriously doubt that the Liberitarians would hold to their original ideals for long, after having tasted power.
I hold no affiliation to any party. I don't like to say I'm in the middle because I don't see myself as a fence sitter. I have my own political views, some of which are held by each of the political parties and some of which are held by none. My vote always goes to the candidate I despise the least. Strangely, the more I learn about people and politics, the more I feel like I'm not in the minority.