I'm not defending a liar.
This whole trial and process had politics written all over it. That much is obvious by the comments made here, trying to bring Cheney into the fray, or blaming Cheney for outing Plame, when he never did anything like that.
The facts are...
.....
In 2003 and 2004, intense speculation about Libby centered on the possibility that he may have been the administration official who "leaked" the identity of Valerie Plame Wilson, a CIA employee whose identity was classified.
....
But,
....
On August 30, 2006, The New York Times reported that Deputy Secretary of State Department Richard Armitage was the "initial and primary source" for columnist Robert Novak's article of July 14, 2003, which named Valerie Plame as a CIA "operative".[19] CNN reported also that Armitage had been confirmed "by sources" as disclosing Mrs. Wilson's CIA role in a "casual conversation" with Robert Novak.[20][21]
....
According to this...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligence_Identities_Protection_Act
It is a federal crime to give information about NOC...or any CIA agent working undercover.
Why the hell is Libby being charged, while Novak gets free reign?
Prejury? A weak excuse for a jury that was looking to make heads roll, but came up short. Shucks....next time they better file a civil suit against Libby, Cheney and Karl Rove...but later amend it when they figure out the jokes on them, and those 3 people aren't guilty. You know, like the Wilson's did.