• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Whats next?

jujigatami

Thinker
jujigatami
Joined
Sep 20, 2006
Messages
136
I posted this in another thread, but I really would like to know what the nutters could possibly come up with next.

Seriously.

I mean they believe that WRT the towers:

Nukes brought down the towers
Holograms instead of planes
Star Wars beam weapon
Faster than freefall
Directional nukes (different than just nukes)
Firefighters "pulling" WTC7
Thermate/mite
Controlled Demolition on a scale 10 times larger than ever before

And I'm sure I'm forgetting LOADS of other craziness.

And somehow WE'RE supoposed to prove that this utterly crazy stuff didn't happen.

Seriously, a "star wars beam weapon" theory is assumed credible by the nutters and WE have to provide evidence that it isn't?

I haven't seen any of the more prominent deniers postulate that it was space aliens, but can that be too far away.

After all their other theories are laughed out of existence, what will be left? Cause you know they aren't giving up.

I seriously fear for manking with these kind of idiots in the gene pool.
 
I posted this in another thread allready, but what the hell...

The towers where destoyed by...

MontyPythonFootLarge.jpg
 
Bell said:
I posted this in another thread allready, but what the hell...

The towers where destoyed by...

[qimg]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/3/3f/MontyPythonFootLarge.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...

:dl:

Good thing you're posting it again, I must have missed it. :D
 
The truly sad part is that the "giant foot theory" is far more credible tan most of the CTs out there.

Sigh.
 
pdoherty76 said:
i would love to see one of u clowns debate steven jones lol
Click to expand...

About what... cold fusion, or Christ in the Americas? Those seem to be the only thing he knows anything about. Ask him how that"third" peer review is going! Bwahahahaha!
 
why do u find it necesry to fake pictures in ur paper, dr jones. pwnd. lol. I win.
 
it would go more like this:

jones: according to the conservation of momentum....and fake pictures

sleahead: u is pwnd. lol
 
There are a handful of people on this board and others who could very well hold their own if debating Jones.

Then there are experts around the world, and in his own university, who think his theories are full of crap AND can succinctly explain why they think so who would fair well in a debate against him.

Jeeze, he's not a god pdoherty76.
 
twinstead said:
There are a handful of people on this board and others who could very well hold their own if debating Jones.

Then there are experts around the world, and in his own university, who think his theories are full of crap AND can succinctly explain why they think so who would fair well in a debate against him.

Jeeze, he's not a god pdoherty76.
Click to expand...

well at least he would debate, the clowns at nist refuse to
 
pdoherty76 said:
it would go more like this:

jones: according to the conservation of momentum....

sleahead: i want my mummy
Click to expand...
more liek:

default.xbe: how doesw the presence of sulphur prove thermite when the gypsum wallboard is made of calcuim sulphate?

jones: uhh....well, see, we're still researching that...


hes been "still researching" that little tidbit for as year and a half now
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom