• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

What is the definition of “I”? -- “I” is the software which runs on neural-network-HW

I'm not seeing the distinction between hardware and software here. I'm probably not seeing it because I'm not technical nor an expert.
You speak of software in the brain, so it sounds like you mean a specific thing. Software, to me, is a sequence of instructions that trigger varied actions in the hardware. Is that how you use the word?


Here is a textbook “Handbook of analog computation”, go to Chapter 3, which explains the analog programming of analog computers
=======================
http://www.analogmuseum.org/library/handbook_of_analog_computation.pdf
Chapter 3. Elementary analog programming
=======================


Analogue computer works by the network they have and the state they have. Just as described by me above. The algorithm which you are speaking of are contained in the *network* and network component and ab initio data for an analogue computer. Way to shoot yourself in the foot.


We will remind that digital software also is unable to run without adequate hardware. As for example, if you will try to run x86 program on ARM architecture processor – it will not run. Your digital software program totally depends on the architecture of hardware, thus generally speaking that is exactly the same problem as with analog computers.

=======================
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_CPU_architectures
Embedded CPU architectures:
ARM's
ARM architecture (32-bit)
ARM64 (64/32-bit)
Atmel's AVR architecture
Microchip's PIC architecture
Texas Instruments's MSP430 architecture
Intel's 8051 architecture
Zilog's Z80 architecture
Western Design Center's 65816 architecture
Hitachi's SuperH architecture
Axis Communications' ETRAX CRIS architecture
Power Architecture (formerly PowerPC)
EnSilica's eSi-RISC architecture
Milkymist architecture
Inmos' Transputer architectures
=======================


There's no reason analog computers couldn't run software the way we think of the term. They just fell out of favor before the separation of hardware and software became a thing.


Beelzebuddy is correct.
 
Alright, homework reading aside, how does that affect your complaint earlier?

The term “software” has a much broader meaning than many people are used to. Usually when people hear the word “software” they associate that word with digital computers which run digital software. However there is a completely separate class of computing machines which is called “analog computers”. Analog computers process information in completely different way than digital computers and also what is important – the software which runs on analog computers has completely different form from digital computers. Instead of digital digits analog computers process information in another form – they process analog signals.

It seems like we've circled back and now digital is as good as analogue.
 
I've been working on cognitive theory for some time. I think consciousness is purely materialistic.


Barehl claims that he believes that “consciousness is purely materialistic”. Well…, barehl can believe anything he wants, however that is pure faith, that is not science.

In order to meet scientific requirements you need to:
1) provide scientific definition of the term “consciousness” (and not some recursive meaningless pseudodefinitions) ;
2) provide the list of criteria (the list of features) which would allow to determine if object X has consciousness or not;
3) provide at least one proof that you yourself have “consciousness”.

When a man uses a term/word which he is unable to define then it is quite obvious that such man does not understand himself what he is talking about, it is obvious that his speech is meaningless by definition. The term “consciousness” is unscientific and has nothing to do with science.

When “I” is defined as the software which runs on neural-network-hardware (i.e. on neurons of the brain) then all these problems are solved.
In order to detect if “I-software” is present in the brain you need simply to measure the electrical activity of neurons of the brain.
If electrical activity is present in the neurons then “I-software” is present in the brain.
If electrical activity is absent in the neurons then “I-software” is absent in the brain.

Religious adepts claim that flat EEG during NDE (Near-Death Experience) proves that the person was completely dead during NDE experience, however such claim is not true. The truth is that EEG is unable to register the electric potentials generated by an individual neurons, EEG is able to register only the synchronous activity of thousands of neurons. If EEG is flat then it does not mean that all neurons are “silent” and “dead”. To clarify the idea we will provide the analogy. Suppose you are walking nearby a football stadium (during a match) in which thousands of football fans synchronously loudly chant the name of their supported team – you can hear this chanting even being far away from the stadium. However if football fans do not synchronously chant loudly then you will be unable to hear what two men are talking to each other sitting in nearby seats in the stadium. Exactly the same situation is with EEG. When heart beating and breathing stops, the brain is transferred into energy saving mode and all non-vital zones of the brain are shut down saving the last resources for the neurocluster of main personality, which immediately is thrown into “spiritual worlds” (into the virtual worlds modeled by the brain). Huge zones of the brain are devoted for processing information coming from sensory organs (extracting invariant features), as for example in order to recognize visual stimulus (as for example the figure of some deity/angel/etc) coming from the physical eyes millions of neurons must do information processing and this neural activity can be registered with EEG. However when being in “spiritual world” the deity/angel/etc is modeled by relatively small number of neurons and EEG is unable to register this neural activity, EEG will be flat despite the fact that at the same time main personality is communicating with deity/angel/etc in “spiritual world”. This is elementary physics and neurobiology. The main personality can have extensive “spiritual experience” during flat EEG. When a man is in coma stage and if you will put microelectrodes into single neurons then you will be able to register neural spikes in single neurons even when EEG is flat. Neurons stop firing spikes only when they are physically damaged or destroyed.

=======================
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electroencephalography
Electroencephalography (EEG) is the recording of electrical activity along the scalp. EEG measures voltage fluctuations resulting from ionic current flows within the neurons of the brain. In clinical contexts, EEG refers to the recording of the brain's spontaneous electrical activity over a short period of time, usually 20–40 minutes, as recorded from multiple electrodes placed on the scalp. Diagnostic applications generally focus on the spectral content of EEG, that is, the type of neural oscillations that can be observed in EEG signals.
<...>
Source of EEG activity
The brain's electrical charge is maintained by billions of neurons. Neurons are electrically charged (or "polarized") by membrane transport proteins that pump ions across their membranes. Neurons are constantly exchanging ions with the extracellular milieu, for example to maintain resting potential and to propagate action potentials. Ions of similar charge repel each other, and when many ions are pushed out of many neurons at the same time, they can push their neighbours, who push their neighbours, and so on, in a wave. This process is known as volume conduction. When the wave of ions reaches the electrodes on the scalp, they can push or pull electrons on the metal on the electrodes. Since metal conducts the push and pull of electrons easily, the difference in push or pull voltages between any two electrodes can be measured by a voltmeter. Recording these voltages over time gives us the EEG.
The electric potential generated by an individual neuron is far too small to be picked up by EEG or MEG. EEG activity therefore always reflects the summation of the synchronous activity of thousands or millions of neurons that have similar spatial orientation. If the cells do not have similar spatial orientation, their ions do not line up and create waves to be detected. Pyramidal neurons of the cortex are thought to produce the most EEG signal because they are well-aligned and fire together. Because voltage fields fall off with the square of distance, activity from deep sources is more difficult to detect than currents near the skull.
Scalp EEG activity shows oscillations at a variety of frequencies. Several of these oscillations have characteristic frequency ranges, spatial distributions and are associated with different states of brain functioning (e.g., waking and the various sleep stages). These oscillations represent synchronized activity over a network of neurons. The neuronal networks underlying some of these oscillations are understood (e.g., the thalamocortical resonance underlying sleep spindles), while many others are not (e.g., the system that generates the posterior basic rhythm). Research that measures both EEG and neuron spiking finds the relationship between the two is complex, with a combination of EEG power in the gamma band and phase in the delta band relating most strongly to neuron spike activity.
=======================

=======================
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain_death
Note that brain electrical activity can stop completely, or drop to such a low level as to be undetectable with most equipment. An EEG will therefore be flat, though this is sometimes also observed during deep anesthesia or cardiac arrest. Although in the United States a flat EEG test is not required to certify death, it is considered to have confirmatory value. In the UK it is not considered to be of value because any continuing activity it might reveal in parts of the brain above the brain stem is held to be irrelevant to the diagnosis of death on the Code of Practice criteria.
=======================
 
The lecturing tone of the walls o' text put me off; tl;drm. I could be wrong but I suspect the gedanken in this thought experimenht may be ge*****. :)
 
and frankly there is not really an I if I understood the latest research : there is a series of massively parallel network working on different stuff and interconnecting, and the emerging stuff is what we see as the I.


The misunderstanding here is caused by erroneous default assumption that the brain contains only one “I”.

The human brain contains billions of neural cells however the man perceives himself as having only one(1) personality, one(1) consciousness, one(1) “I”, and people who believe in the existence of the soul perceive themselves as having only one(1) soul. Human brain contains billions of neurons however vast majority of people strongly believe that all these billions of neurons contain only one(1) personality, one(1) consciousness, one(1) soul, one(1) “I”.
This “one human body contains one consciousness” model is sufficient to explain the majority of events in casual normal routine life and this is the reason why this model has become de facto accepted model in all human cultures and societies without ever doubting its validity. Medieval scholars were debating the question “how many angels can fit on the head of a pin?” (a.k.a. “how many angels can dance on the head of a pin?”), however nobody has ever raised the question “how many souls can be contained in one human body?” assuming by default that one(1) human body contains only one(1) soul.

Neurocluster Brain Model claims that neurons in the human brain are organized not into one “personality” (one “I”), but instead these neurons are organized into many (more or less autonomic) clusters of neurons and each such neurocluster forms (more or less autonomic) “personality” and there are several ways to prove that experimentally. However only single one from these multiple neuroclusters has access to the control of the body (control of speech, control of body movements) and Neurocluster Brain Model calls this neurocluster as the “main personality”. Other autonomous neuroclusters remain hidden from the outside observer and also they are hidden from the “main personality”. However under some special conditions these hidden autonomous neuroclusters can become able to manifest themselves for the “main personality” (by communicating with “main personality”, by generating various images/sounds/etc to “main personality”) and after this happens the “main personality” decides that he is communicating with “spiritual beings from the spiritual world” – this is the underlying mechanism of how religious adepts communicate with spirits/angels/Gods/etc and also the underlying mechanism of other religious and occult phenomena.

One of the simplest experimental proofs of multiple autonomic neuroclusters residing in the brain is the analysis of features of the dream characters.
During the dreaming process the man sees various characters (people/animals/etc) in the dream scenario. Let’s ask a simple question – do these characters (which are seen in the dream) have their own consciousness or not?
Let’s suppose the answer this question is “no, dream characters do not have their own consciousness”. Such answer raises a simple question – if the dream characters do not have their own consciousness, then how can it be that these dream characters can communicate with you, talk with you, ask questions to you, answer your questions, etc – how the dream characters can accomplish such tasks if they do not have their own consciousness? If the dream characters do not have their own consciousness, then this leads to the conclusion that agent (dream character) does not need to have the consciousness in order to appear like it has consciousness.
Now let’s analyze another scenario. Suppose the answer is “yes, dream characters do have their own consciousness”. Such answer raises a simple question – who is the physical carrier of dream character’s consciousness? The most common answer which people give to such question is “non-material spirits hover beyond the material world and these spirits come into the dream where they meet other non-material spirits and these spirits communicate between with each other.” However let’s analyze the following situation. Suppose you go to sleep and you see Susane in your dream. However while you are sleeping and while you are seeing Susane in your dream, the real physical Susane is located in the next room where she is cooking food, reading book, etc. If Susane would be asleep while you are sleeping, then the explanation would be that your spirit and Susane’s spirit have met beyond the material world. However problem lays in the fact that Susane is not asleep, Susane is awake and Susane’s spirit is inside the physical body of Susane and Susane is busy with some action. If you are seeing Susane in the dream, then how can the spirit of Susane be in two different places simultaneously – in your dream and in the next room? These are very simple questions which lead to insolvable paradoxes.
However all these paradoxes can be easily solved using neurocluster brain model. Susane which you see in your dream is not the Susane’s spirit, but instead a neurocluster into which the model of Susane is written and stored. This neurocluster simulates all the behavior of Susane: how Susane moves, how Susane talks, etc. The more accurate and the more detailed the model of Susane is, the more realistic the dream scenario becomes.
The characters (which are seen/met in the dream) have different intelligence level – one characters can speak fluently, while other characters are incoherent, and third characters are unable to stammer out a single word. Why there is such difference in the intelligence level? The underlying mechanism is very simple.
If the neurocluster which models character X contains low number of neurons then character X will have low intelligence level.
If the neurocluster which models character X contains big number of neurons then character X will have high intelligence level.
The good analogy for the model of object X stored into neurocluster is the computer file. However such neurocluster is not a simple computer data file, this neurocluster also can act as executable (EXE) computer program file.
During the dreaming process the models of various characters become “alive” autonomic personalities which are able to act independently from the main personality.
Under some conditions the character which is stored inside the neurocluster can become able to communicate with the man’s main personality while the man is awake.
If the neurocluster is located nearby the hearing/vision areas inside the brain, and neural links reach hearing/vision areas, then such neurocluster may begin “tele-radio” translation for the man’s main personality and the main personality with begin to hear the voice of “God/angels/cosmos/etc” and see images of “God/angels/cosmos/etc”.
If the neurocluster is located nearby the motor areas inside the brain, then such neurocluster can take over the control of the man’s body – and this is the classical scenario when “demon possessed” man can attack nearby people and/or accomplish some other actions with the man’s body. As a rule, the neurocluster which contains the model of the “demon” has very limited and relatively small number of neurons at its possession and this is the reason why the intelligence level of such “demons” is very low – the “demon” can only induce shaking convulsions or physically attack somebody nearby, however maintaining meaningful highly intelligent conversation with such “demon” is not possible at all. During sleepwalking (somnambulism) when autonomic neurocluster takes over control of man’s body usually the intelligence level of autonomic neurocluster is also very low and this is the reason why it is not possible to carry meaningful highly intelligent conversation with the sleepwalker.
If the neurocluster is located nearby the areas of the brain which control the mouth and voice, and neural links reach voice control areas, then such autonomic neurocluster can take over the man’s voice and begin talking via man’s mouth – this phenomena is known under the name of “channeling”.
If the neurocluster has huge number of neurons at his disposal and if the neurocluster has full access to the control of the man’s body, then this manifests itself as „multiple personality disorder“.

The typical classic example of autonomic neurocluster is so called “archangel Gabriel” which dictated the text of Quran to Muhammad.

=======================
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad
The Quran is the central religious text of Islam. Muslims believe that it represents the words of God revealed to Muhammad through the archangel Gabriel.
=======================
 
Another experimental proof of multiple autonomic neuroclusters residing in the brain is invoking of spirits during the spiritualistic séance.

Let’s examine the underlying mechanisms of invoking of spirits in the spiritualistic séance. During the spiritualistic séance spirits can be invoked in various ways, however one of the most popular and the best working method is “needle on the thread” method which works in the following way. A group of people (usually 3-10) sit around the table. A piece of paper is placed on the table. The circle is drawn on the paper and alphabet letters are written on the perimeter of the circle (image bellow shows an example of such “spirit board”).

=======================
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ouija
The Ouija board (/ˈwiːdʒə/ wee-jə), also known as a spirit board or talking board, is a flat board marked with the letters of the alphabet, the numbers 0–9, the words "yes", "no", "hello" (occasionally), and "goodbye", along with various symbols and graphics. It uses a planchette (small heart-shaped piece of wood or plastic) as a movable indicator to indicate the spirit's message by spelling it out on the board during a séance. Participants place their fingers on the planchette, and it is moved about the board to spell out words. "Ouija" has become a trademark that is often used generically to refer to any talking board.
<...>
One of the first mentions of the automatic writing method used in the Ouija board is found in China around 1100 AD, in historical documents of the Song Dynasty. The method was known as fuji (扶乩), "planchette writing". The use of planchette writing as an ostensible means of contacting the dead and the spirit-world continued, and, albeit under special rituals and supervisions, was a central practice of the Quanzhen School, until it was forbidden by the Qing Dynasty. Several entire scriptures of the Daozang are supposedly works of automatic planchette writing. Similar methods of mediumistic spirit writing have been widely practiced in ancient India, Greece, Rome, and medieval Europe.
=======================

One of the participants takes into the hand the thread with the attached needle and stretches his hand over the table in such way that needle would hang above the center of the circle with alphabet letters. Then participants decide which spirit they would like to invoke. For example, participants have decided to invoke the spirit of Napoleon. Then all participants concentrate and begin mentally calling the spirit of Napoleon. However spirits are self-willed and invoking of the spirit can fail. It is very easy to check if the spirit invocation has succeeded or not. You need to ask questions for the spirit and the spirit provides the answers via the thread which has a needle attached at the end. After asking the question you need to hold the hand with the thread above the circle with alphabet letters and you need to look closely where the needle moves. The needle should move from one alphabet letter to another alphabet letter thus forming words and sentences. If the needle does not move at all or the movement of needle forms meaningless jumble of letters then this means that you have failed in spirit invocation. However this is not the end of the game. You can try invoking the same spirit anew, however now another participant should take thread with needle into his hand and procedure of the spirit invocation is started all over again. In case of the failure the third participant repeats the procedure again. And so on. Only in the case when none of the participants has succeeded in spirit invocation, only in that case it is considered that this particular spirit can not be invoked and participants must choose another spirit for invocation. If invoking of Napoleon spirit has failed then maybe the invocation of Abraham Lincoln’s spirit will succeed. And the invocation procedure is started all over again anew. The procedure is repeated as many times as needed until invocation of any spirit will succeed. When spirit is invoked, the communication with spirit is accomplished by asking questions and looking closely at the movement of needle over the circle with alphabet letters which should form words and sentences from single letters.

Communication with spirit (spiritualistic séance) is governed by several laws:

1) The thread the needle must be hold in the hand of alive human. If the needle with the thread will be tied to some inanimate object (like for example the lamp, ceiling, etc) then no spirit will be able to move that needle from standing still position, no spirit will be able to move that needle forming words and sentences from the letters. The needle will hang still in one place. In other words, the spirit can manifest itself only via movements of alive human. Without alive human who holds thread with the needle the spirit will be unable to manifest itself. If the needle with the thread will be tied to some inanimate object then it will hang still in one place no matter what kind of magic incantations, prayers, magic incense/candles, drum beats, chanting, etc will be used – nothing will help and the needle will hang still firmly in one place. And according to claims of religious adepts spirits are able to move and throw heavy objects (like tables, closets, etc) – in such case moving a thread with a needle must be extremely easy task for the spirit. However needle is unable to move unless it is held be alive human. The techniques of spiritualistic séances clearly show that spirits are unable to move inanimate objects – no spirit is able to move the needle from standing still position if that needle is tied to inanimate object. The spirit can manifest itself only via movements of alive human.

2) Only small percentage of people can invoke the spirit with thread and needle method. For example if you have a group of 10 participants then only 1, 3, 5, 7, etc participants can invoke the spirit. Only in rare cases the spirit can be invoked by all participants in the group.

3) Every man has the unique psychological portrait and a man can be identified by his unique characteristic speech pattern, unique characteristic vocabulary, unique characteristic style of sentences, even unique characteristic grammatical errors, etc. As for example when we have a text piece consisting of 10 sentences often we can quite clearly identify if this text was written by Peter, John, Thomas or somebody else. The same concept applies to spirits too. Spirits have their unique psychological portrait too. However it very important to note that the same spirit X (for example Napoleon’s spirit) changes its psychological portrait depending on which man is holding the thread with the needle. For example if John holds the thread with the needle then Napoleon’s spirit will become very knowledgeable in music and ignoramus in technical sciences, however if Peter takes the thread with the needle in his hands then Napoleon’s spirit becomes knowledgeable in technical sciences and ignoramus in music, when the thread with the needle is returned back to John the Napoleon’s spirit becomes again knowledgeable in music and ignoramus in technical sciences. In other words experimental results of spiritualistic séances clearly show that Napoleon’s spirit changes its psychological portrait depending on which man is holding the thread with the needle. It is obvious that if Napoleon’s spirit would be independently existing independent object then its psychological portrait would remain stable and would not change when different people take the thread with the needle into their hands. This means that Napoleon’s spirit is modeled by the neurocluster inside man’s brain. Different people have different knowledge about Napoleon and thus they have different Napoleon models inside their brain. Some things in these Napoleon models will similar however there will be also differences. And the more the knowledge about Napoleon differs in different people the more the psychological portraits of Napoleon’s spirit will be different when these people invoke Napoleon’s spirit using thread with the needle method. If a man’s brain contains insufficient knowledge about Napoleon, in other words if a man’s brain has very weak model about Napoleon then such man will be unable to invoke Napoleon’s spirit during spiritualistic séance.
Experimental results show that spirits which are invoked during spiritualistic séances are merely autonomic neuroclusters inside the man’s brain which model personality of spirit X. In other words during spiritualistic séances the man is communicating with his own autonomic neuroclusters inside its own brain in the similar way like in the split-brain experiments. Due to the ignorance of the brain physiology people naively believe that they are communicating with the spirits from outside of the material world.

4) If spiritualistic séances are performed regularly for prolonged periods of time then very often mediums begin to experience “strange unexplainable frightening things” – various objects in the home begin disappearing and reappearing in unusual places (like for example shoes in the fridge), clothes are thrown out from closets and closets are overthrown to the floor, tables overthrown, various things are broken, etc. However all these stories have one common pattern – when a man is asked “have you seen with your own eyes how these things move, fly around or break apart?”, the answer is always “no, I have not seen that with my own eyes, however when I opened the door of the room, I had found things scattered and broken, closet overthrown to the floor, etc”, in other words, he always sees only the final result (things moved or broken), however he never sees the action itself – how these things move or break. For some mediums these “strange unexplainable frightening things” disappear themselves and never come back again, however for other mediums these incidents do not stop and continue happening until a man gets crazy from permanent fear and that man ends up in a lunatic asylum.
Let’s raise a question: why spiritualistic séances often end up with “strange unexplainable frightening things” happening to the medium?
The answer is simple. When spiritualistic séances are performed regularly for prolonged periods of time then autonomic neuroclusters in the brain develop more and more the ability to control man’s body independently from main personality – at first only small microscopic hand movements and later autonomic neurocluster becomes able to take over the control of whole body and this phenomenon is called “sleepwalking”.
During sleepwalking a man gets out from the bed, walks around the home moving and breaking various objects, goes back to bed, and in the morning when he wakes up he has no remembrance of his nocturnal activity. After waking up he finds that some objects in his home are misplaced in unusual places and some of the objects are broken. A man immediately begins to panic “who has moved these objects if I was alone in the home?”. In order to remain sanity a man needs to have model of the world which would explain what is happening around him. The fastest explanation for misplaced objects is that some flying-demon-spirit has moved these objects. However the truth is that he himself has moved these objects while sleepwalking, however he does not know that, so he strongly sticks to the belief that demon-spirits are flying around in his house. During sleepwalking incidents he might even kill people and when he will wake up he will be strongly convinced that demon-spirits had killed these people.
If “strange unexplainable frightening things” happen during the night then it is the classical case of sleepwalking, however if “strange unexplainable frightening things” happen during the daytime (such cases are much more rare) then it is the case of „multiple personality disorder“.
 
Too much text, not enough empathy for readers. Get your clusters together and have an editor's meeting.
 
Is "running" the bones and muscles and nerves of my legs? No.

Is "running" the neural configurations that tell the muscles of my legs the right pattern to contract in, in order to move rapidly on foot? No.

Running is what my legs actually do. Running happens at runtime.


Am "I" the neurons of my brain? No.

Am "I" the interconnection configuration of the neurons in my brain (the closest thing they have to software)? No.

"I" am what results when certain parts of my brain perform their function. "I" happen at runtime.
 
"I" am what results when certain parts of my brain perform their function. "I" happen at runtime.


Question for Myriad: And how exactly do “certain parts of my brain perform their function”? What is the underlying mechanism of “parts of my brain performing their function”? How does the brain “perform its function”? What processes happen during brain “performing its function”?
 
Seances are superstitious claptrap.
I think (s)he is acknowleding that the ideomotor effect is the underlying cause of the phenomenon of ouija boards, but is claiming that prolonged use of it eventually results in changes in the brain which make other instances of the unconscious taking control of the body's muscles, eg sleepwalking, more likely.
 
Well, theoretically we can replace a single original natural neuron by artificial neuron which has exactly the same functionality as the original natural neuron – in that case “I” will remain unchanged.
No, that's not even theoretically possible because the brain is highly dynamic, not static while you swap out neurons.

We will explain more detailed.
Who's "we"?
 
Running is what my legs actually do. .. "I" am what results when certain parts of my brain perform their function. "I" happen at runtime.

You only happen when your legs are moving?
:D

I picture humans as Rube Goldberg machines. Push vooma in and the whole cascade jiggles and opines.

If any of the pipes burst, the manikin deflates. Sometimes other dolls can repair it. Eventually not. Related puppets leak fluids from their eyes; voom on.
 
Seances are superstitious claptrap.


Yes, the claims and explanations of religious adepts about the underlying nature of spiritualistic séances is superstitious claptrap. Religious adepts claim that during spiritualistic séances they are communicating with “spiritual beings” from other galaxies/universes/worlds/etc – all such claims are superstitious claptrap.

However the phenomenon of “spiritualistic séance” is a real tangible phenomenon which can be investigated by reproducible experiments, and these experimental results are easily explained by Neurocluster Brain Model – the autonomous neuroclusters inside the brain of the medium act as independent agents who are able to transmit messages to the “main personality” (and for outside observer) via means of microscopic muscular contractions of the hand of the medium.
It is important to note however that the technical implementation of experimental setup for “spiritualistic séance” plays a major role here.
Various Hollywood movies display “spiritualistic séances” with Ouija boards which use a planchette (small heart-shaped piece of wood or plastic) as a movable indicator to indicate a spirit's message by spelling it out on the board during a séance; participants place their fingers on the planchette, and it is moved about the board to spell out words; sometimes a cup, a glass, or saucer is used instead of planchette.
However this setup (using heavy objects like planchette/cup/glass/saucer/etc) actually almost never works in practice due to the simple reason – the object is too heavy and microscopic muscular contractions of the hand are unable to move it. While we admit that it is quite probable that this setup might work for man with highly expressed mediumship abilities, however experimental results show that this setup almost never works for average statistical man. So it is really strange why this non-working setup is so highly promoted by Hollywood movies and various occult organizations.
If you want to succeed in carrying out reproducible experiments of “spiritualistic séances” then you need to use different experimental setup – instead of the planchette you need to use the thread with the attached needle (as described in previous posting), and this setup will allow the manifestation of microscopic muscular contractions of the hand resulting in successful “spiritualistic séance” with autonomous neuroclusters inside the brain of the medium – with this experimental setup you can carry as many reproducible experiments as you wish. However important warning here – these experiments have undesirable side-effect – after prolonged repeatable experimentation with “spiritualistic séances” you have high risk to induce sleepwalking incidents for the “medium”, during which the “medium” will be moving/breaking/etc various things in his own house, and when after awakening he finds things broken and scattered around his house, he becomes scared and strongly convinced that “evil spirits have possessed his house” – in more advanced cases this leads to the lunatic asylum.
In other words, “spiritualistic séances” can be investigated by reproducible experiments, however you must always be very careful with the undesirable side-effects of such experiments.


I think (s)he is acknowleding that the ideomotor effect is the underlying cause of the phenomenon of ouija boards, but is claiming that prolonged use of it eventually results in changes in the brain which make other instances of the unconscious taking control of the body's muscles, eg sleepwalking, more likely.


Skeptic scientists who investigate the dowsing phenomenon use the term “ideomotor effect” which supposedly explains phenomena like automatic writing, dowsing, facilitated communication, and Ouija boards.
However the truth is that the etymology of the term “ideomotor” (derived from the components “ideo”, meaning "idea" and “motor”, meaning "muscular action") reveals the complete lack of understanding of the underlying mechanisms of these phenomena. The etymology of term “ideomotor” means that ideas move the hand of the dowser which raises a simple question: WHOSE ideas move the hand of the dowser? Do the ideas of the dowser move his hand? Do the ideas of the main personality of the dowser move his hand? Experimental facts show that the hand is moved not by the main personality of the dowser. So, the question remains: whose ideas are moving the hand, if it is not the main personality of the dowser? Psychologist/psychiatrists tell us that some vaguely ill-defined “subconscious” moves the hand, and when you ask them to provide the exact scientific definition “what is the subconscious” then they flood you with pseudoscientific self-contradictory blabber about “subconscious” which has no semantic meaning whatsoever – that blabber is not any better than a blabber of the occultists on the same topic.
So let’s fix this mess, let’s make things clear and scientific once and for all. Autonomous neuroclusters inside the brain of the dowser are moving the hand of the dowser. These autonomous neuroclusters inside the brain of the dowser act as independent agents who are able to act independently from the main personality of the dowser.

=======================
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ideomotor_phenomenon
Ideomotor phenomenon is a psychological phenomenon wherein a subject makes motions unconsciously.
An example of table-turning in 19th century France. A circle of participants press their hands against a table, and the ideomotor effect causes the table to tilt in such a way as to produce a written message, in a manner similar to a ouija board.
The ideomotor response (or "ideomotor reflex"), often abbreviated to IMR, is a concept in hypnosis and psychological research. It is derived from the terms "ideo" (idea, or mental representation) and "motor" (muscular action).
=======================
 
2) pure-materialists define “I” as the stack of material atoms which supposedly form some ill-defined “consciousness”.
However almost nobody defines “I” as the “software”.

This is a strawman conception of what materialists think. I consider myself a materialist, and certainly do not think this; nor do I know of any other materialist who thinks that the experiential "I" is "a stack of material atoms". A stack of material atoms is a pile of stuff, and thus cannot, by definition, be something which is not a pile of stuff; which is an activity.

Consciousness is the electro-chemical activity of the brain. Electro-chemical activity is a material thing. Even your comparison with the running of software actually better fits with pure materialism than any imagined middle-state between materialism an immaterialism of religious ideas.

Software doesn't run by itself; it runs in a computer. A software running on a computer is the electric activity of the components of that computer, nothing else. The electric activity is a purely materialistic process.

So nothing at all in your ideas expounded here on what the "I" is goes against pure materialism, unless you define materialism to mean something that no materialist would be willing to identify as their view.
 
So let’s fix this mess, let’s make things clear and scientific once and for all. Autonomous neuroclusters inside the brain of the dowser are moving the hand of the dowser. These autonomous neuroclusters inside the brain of the dowser act as independent agents who are able to act independently from the main personality of the dowser.

First, that the etymology of a word refers to one thing, does not mean that the word literally means that thing. I think you've conjured up the claimed confusion out of semantics, and I don't see it in the concepts referred to by those words.

Second, the bit quoted above; if the ideomotor effect would be controlled by neuroclusters completely independent of what you call the "main personality of the dowser", it would be hard to explain how the actual conscious knowledge of the dowser can determine when the dowsing rod bends. In dowsing tests, there's typically a preliminary test where the dowser is allowed to know in advance where the water (or whatever is being dowsed for) is located, to test that his dowsing rod "works" to his satisfaction. In these cases, ideomotor effect confirms the dowser's expectation, and the rod bends at the correct location.

Thirdly, I don't see at all how - even if we were to think that the ideomotor effect works isolated from the "main personality" - that would in any way imply anything other than a materialist conception of brain processes, as briefly described in my previous post.
 
First, that the etymology of a word refers to one thing, does not mean that the word literally means that thing. I think you've conjured up the claimed confusion out of semantics, and I don't see it in the concepts referred to by those words.


Term which was coined by the person to describe the phenomenon reveals the level of that person’s comprehension about the phenomenon. The higher level of comprehension enables to forecast and to control manifestation of that phenomenon. As for example, in earlier times people called the lightning as “punishment of God” and people trying to avoid the lightning strike were praying to various Gods, while nowadays people call the lightning as “electric discharge” and use lightning rods to avoid lightning strikes.
The etymology of the term/word is important because it might force people (who use that term) into some default incorrect assumptions about the phenomenon described by that word.
One practical example is the term “MPD” (“multiple personality disorder”) . In earlier times “multiple personality disorder” was called “double conscious”, “double consciousness”, or “dual personality” and only much later (approximately at the end of 19th century and the beginning of 20th century) it got the name “multiple personality disorder”.
The term “schizophrenia” was made up from two Greek roots: skhizein (gr. σχίζω) which means “to split” and phrēn (gr. φρήν) which means “mind”. The exact translation from Greek of word “schizophrenia” means “split mind”, thus the word “schizophrenia” would be a much better term to describe the patient’s condition than the term “multiple personality disorder”. However the word “schizophrenia” was already in use in psychiatry having another meaning, thus new term was needed to be invented in order word meanings do not clash. Thus instead of word “schizophrenia” the new name “multiple personality disorder” was given. However, in year 1994 American Psychiatric Association renamed “multiple personality disorder” into improper name “dissociative identity disorder (DID)” which clearly reveals that official psychiatry has no clue whatsoever about underlying mechanism of “multiple personality disorder”.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom