jay gw said:
What is a "normal" person like? How would you know if you're normal or not? Is there any objective way of knowing?
Once you have an answer to your first question, the other answers fall in line. You would know if you were normal or not by comparing yourself to the first answer, which would be your objective way of knowing.
So, the problem is all wrapped up in that first question. First, what does "normal" even mean? The first defintion
here is
Conforming with, adhering to, or constituting a norm, standard, pattern, level, or type; typical
So, a normal human is one that conforms to norms, see? Simple.
The problem is that a human is an amalgamation of thousands (probably millions or more, really) of different faculties, each one with its own set of norms. Does one have to be normal in
every area (eyesight, height, political ideals and the strength thereof...) to be a normal person? If not, how many areas can they be abnormal in and still qualify for overall normalcy? How many abnormal parts is it normal for a human to have? Are all abnormalities equal (is having 20/30 vision equally as abnormal as having six fingers)?
All as a long-winded way of saying that normalcy in humans is not something that can be defined in concrete terms. One needs to get a little fuzzy, I'm afraid, to complete the task, and it's too late for my brain to be fuzzy at the moment, so I'll hand this off to someone else.
