What is a "globalist"

[beachnut]

International Jews at work ....

[qimg]http://i.imgur.com/ecvvVmm.jpg[/qimg]

who? BTW, another opinion, no facts. I see a trend.

Are quotes from Hitler coming next. Do you think the quote means what you think it means. Got some specifics. Got some names for you internal jews at work.
Ready for the next quote.

A globalist is someone who denies the truth of the no spin flat earth reality.

 

[Cosmic Yak]

International Jews at work ....

[qimg]http://i.imgur.com/ecvvVmm.jpg[/qimg]

Or not.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_Bolshevism

On the eve of the February Revolution in 1917, of about 23,000 members of the Bolshevik party 364 (about 1.6%) were known to be ethnic Jews.[14] According to the 1922 Bolshevik party census, there were 19,564 Jewish Bolsheviks, comprising 5.21% of the total, and in the 1920s of the 417 members of the Central Executive Committee, the party Central Committee, the Presidium of the Executive of the Soviets of the USSR and the Russian Republic, the People's Commissars, 6% were ethnic Jews.[19] Between 1936 and 1940, during the Great Purge, Yezhovshchina and after the rapprochement with Nazi Germany, Stalin had largely eliminated Jews from senior party, government, diplomatic, security and military positions.[20]

 

[Border Reiver]

Or not.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_Bolshevism

Facts don't matter to Saggy. In the world of the "anti-globalist" 5% or so of any group being made up of a particular religious affiliation means that that group is both dominated by that religious affiliation and subservient to their nefarious, world spanning plans, because at no point ever could such people ever become part of the larger society.

Fear rules them, drives them and in the end will destroy them.

 

[Saggy]

Trotsky wrote a book 'Stalin' that included this image of a postcard widely circulated in Russia titled 'Leaders of the Proletarian Revolution',

(2) Trotzky, (3) Zinoviev, (5) Kamenev, (6) Sverdlov are Jews. (1) Lenin had Jewish ancestors, spoke Yiddish, had a Jewish wife, and favored Jews in the government. (4) Lunacharsky was a non-Jewish Russian.

This is a banner displayed by the Bolsheviks on the first anniversary of the Communist Revolution,

Of the eleven other than Lenin, five are Jews, Kamenev, Sverdlov, Zinoviev, Trotsky, and Radek.

Plus we've seen Churchill's paper. Solzhenitsyn wrote a book of the subject of the Jews in Russia, 'Two Hundred Years Together', and while we have his comment above, the book has not been published in English.

For the full story see Frank Britton's book 'Behind Communism', here ...

https://saxonmessenger.christogenea.org/article/behind-communism-frank-britton

 

[beachnut]

Trotsky wrote a book 'Stalin' that included this image of a postcard widely circulated in Russia titled 'Leaders of the Proletarian Revolution',

[qimg]http://i.imgur.com/5YSFBqT.jpg[/qimg]

(2) Trotzky, (3) Zinoviev, (5) Kamenev, (6) Sverdlov are Jews. (1) Lenin had Jewish ancestors, spoke Yiddish, had a Jewish wife, and favored Jews in the government. (4) Lunacharsky was a non-Jewish Russian.

This is a banner displayed by the Bolsheviks on the first anniversary of the Communist Revolution,

[qimg]http://i.imgur.com/rUKHg36.jpg[/qimg]

Of the eleven other than Lenin, five are Jews, Kamenev, Sverdlov, Zinoviev, Trotsky, and Radek.

Plus we've seen Churchill's paper. Solzhenitsyn wrote a book of the subject of the Jews in Russia, 'Two Hundred Years Together', and while we have his comment above, the book has not been published in English.

For the full story see Frank Britton's book 'Behind Communism', here ...

https://saxonmessenger.christogenea.org/article/behind-communism-frank-britton

You and Hitler have lost, us Jews won. Get over it. I am not sure if it is bias or gullibility.

 

[Saggy]

You and Hitler have lost, us Jews won. Get over it. I am not sure if it is bias or gullibility.

Perhaps. Could have been a phyrric victory, I don't see how Judaism will be able to survive the ..... oops ..... exposure (e.g. see antisemitism101.com ). Israel is incredibly vulnerable. But you could be right, I recognize that.

 

[Agatha]

Great news! We have a thread for discussion of the holocaust and holocaust denial: see here for the latest iteration.

More great news! We have a thread for discussion of the Israel/Palestine conflict: see here for the latest iteration.

Now that I've pointed you to the appropriate threads, I expect that there will be no more discussion in this thread of the Holocaust or of the Israel/Palestine conflict. If there is, I regret that the consequences will include (but not be limited to) cards, suspensions or worse.

Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Agatha

 

[Venom]

When you come to think about it, Israel the first and only state created by the global community. That is, the genesis of the state is a long story going back to the Balfour declaration made during WW II whereby Britain ceded the land to the Jews, and finally culminating with the UN sanctioning the state in 1948. So there we can see the power of the globalists at work.

[qimg]http://i.imgur.com/jMFt7WR.jpg[/qimg]

hmm I've never really thought of this. Maybe this is where the hate originates from. Even if one is not antisemitic in principle, the globalist hate could very well be an offshoot of this move.

 

[beachnut]

Perhaps. Could have been a phyrric victory, I don't see how Judaism will be able to survive the ..... oops ..... exposure (e.g. see antisemitism101.com ). Israel is incredibly vulnerable. But you could be right, I recognize that.

LOL, The victory, not pyrrhic, Hitler killed himself. He mentioned "jew..." 513 times in his book of woo, obsessed with jews, and become the world's biggest loser. When you win by forfeit, it is not pyrrhic.

lol, the anti-semitic antisemitism101.com, proof a large part of anti-semitism is superior bias based on massive ignorance.

 

[Saggy]

LOL, The victory, not pyrrhic, Hitler killed himself. He mentioned "jew..." 513 times in his book of woo, obsessed with jews, and become the world's biggest loser. When you win by forfeit, it is not pyrrhic.

WW II is correctly viewed as a contest between globalists (the Brits in this case... ) and nationalists (the Germans .... ), and the globalists won, but the struggle is not over. And, it certainly doesn't look good for the nationalists. But .... the globalists are exposed now, so .... who knows what might happen ....

lol, the anti-semitic antisemitism101.com, proof a large part of anti-semitism is superior bias based on massive ignorance.

I don't suppose you'd like to give an example or two? The site supplies what appear to be kosher references.

 

[BStrong]

WW II is correctly viewed as a contest between globalists (the Brits in this case... ) and nationalists (the Germans .... ), and the globalists won, but the struggle is not over. And, it certainly doesn't look good for the nationalists. But .... the globalists are exposed now, so .... who knows what might happen ....




I don't suppose you'd like to give an example or two? The site supplies what appear to be kosher references.

Man, into the weeds before the end of the first sentence.

WWII was some fascist ******** (Japan, Germany and I hate to say it - Italy) deciding they were the next big thing. The Japs beat the hell out of their neighbors, the Italians used MG's and gas against the Ethiopians and Somalians in '35-'36 and the fella w/ the funny 'stache was getting his stuff together to make his run towards being the iron man of Europe.

Meanwhile, the other ******* with the 'stache, Stalin, was extremely busy building the communist paradise that people were dying to get the hell away from.

The Japanese funny 'stache ******* lays claim to the greater east Asia prosperity sphere, whether the nations involved want it or not.

The British, French etc. took a good look at what the fascists were doing and did not like what they saw.

German funny 'stache man beats hell out of unprepared neighbors. Soviets take a run at Finland and fight to a draw. Everything turns to **** quickly. Germany overruns everybody in the way. SovFunny'stache makes nice w/ German funny 'stache. German has fingers crossed.

Britain gets involved, but for some leaders and some in the royal family, their heart isn't really in it.

Meanwhile, across the pond. The US is too busy making money to pay full attention, but some folks do. Some folks want us in, others don't.

Japan jumps in, we jump in.

Sacrifice of England and the occupied western European countries buys a little time. Germany attacks Russia.

Long story short - The lives of Russians and Europeans end German funny 'stache man and his particular version of society with the help of US production abilities and logistics.

American and Allied lives and American production capacity and logistics end Japanese funny 'stache man.

Your "globalist" jive isn't any different than the propaganda that was put out by the losers you're attempting to exonerate.

Get over it. The war was won. Your side lost. The only folks that were conned into fighting that war were the chumps hypnotized by funny mustaches.

 

[Saggy]

The globalists declared war in 1933 ....

 

[BStrong]

The globalists declared war in 1933 ....

[qimg]https://wissenschaft3000.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/march-24-1933-daily-express-judea-declares-war-on-germany.jpg[/qimg]

LOL! How many divisions did "Judea" have? Who was their top general? Ish Kabibble?

 

[Saggy]

LOL! How many divisions did "Judea" have? Who was their top general? Ish Kabibble?

You can count the Brits: facilitated by Jewish control of finance to start, and then their control of politics. The Brits fought WW II for the Jews, just as the US is now bombing the hell out of the ME for the Jews. The topic of how WW II got started is a fascinating one, and I just read Buchanan's book 'WW II, the Unnecessary War', which gives a detailed, not to say comprehensive, account. But all authors agree that Churchill's role was pivotal, and Churchill was a paid agent of the Jews .... for the details see ....

Churchill's financial difficulties and career as an art forger, among other things,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qqWLx8hSov4

leading to his team of Jewish backers ...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-jc9ltEIwpo&list=PL5E573B525A2DF8E4

Ultimately, the US divisions were added to the globalist cause, after years of secret agitiation for war, see 'Roosevelt's Campaign to Incite War in Europe',

https://www.historiography-project.com/jhrchives/v04/v04p135_Weber.php

 

[Saggy]

LOL! How many divisions did "Judea" have? Who was their top general? Ish Kabibble?

How many did they have in WW I ?????

From 'La Démocratie Victorieuse', E. Malynski, 1929

‘The nation which above all others claims to be free and in sovereign command of its own destiny was brainwashed to the hilt. In 1914 any American would have laughed to scorn the idea that in three years time he would be struggling and suffering in France for the sake of affairs which had no connection with those of his own country.

‘And yet, when 1917 came, the same man enlisted enthusiastically. Every soldier whom we happened to interview and questioned as to his personal motives for fighting, invariably replied: 'we are fighting for democracy'. They were one step ahead of their fellow soldiers from other nations, who went for their own country's sake.

‘It is only when we realize that France was invaded by hundreds of thousands of inhabitants from Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Florida, Illinois, Wyoming, California, Louisiana, and subsequently from Ontario, Manitoba, Rhodesia and New South Wales, whose only possible motive was to hasten the triumph of democracy, that we begin to understand something of the power of Israel. The power to stir up a whole nation of solid, egotistical and utilitarian individuals, and to persuade them that their greatest privilege is to set out and get themselves killed at the uttermost ends of the earth, with no hope of gain for themselves or their children and almost without their understanding against or for whom they are fighting, or why, is a simply incredible phenomenon which makes one afraid when one comes to think about it.’

 

[Venom]

Question for Saggy:

Do the globalists intentionally facilitate Islamic extremism and immigration into Europe by the EU agenda,

Or is the constant bombardment of the Middle East globalist "warmongering"??

I get the impression from many exchanges over social media that the narrative is at the theorist's convenience.

The globalists want WAR to dominate the world!!!!
NO, The globalists are passive cucks who want to be overrun by immigrants

 

[Saggy]

Question for Saggy:

#1 - Do the globalists intentionally facilitate Islamic extremism and immigration into Europe by the EU agenda,

#2 - Or is the constant bombardment of the Middle East globalist "warmongering"??

I get the impression from many exchanges over social media that the narrative is at the theorist's convenience.

The globalists want WAR to dominate the world!!!!
#3 - NO, The globalists are passive cucks who want to be overrun by immigrants

#1 - Let Barbara Spectre explain ...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2tFsgo7S8n4

#2 - Is constant aggression accompanied by 26,000 bombs in 2016 warmongering? ??? No, it's a walk in the park.

#3 - I think it was Ish Kabibble that said that, he's usually reliable.

 

[Border Reiver]

How many did they have in WW I ?????

Short answer - none.

Long answer - same as the short answer, but with either Broadway showtunes, or musichall numbers depending on your preferences.

From 'La Démocratie Victorieuse', E. Malynski, 1929

<snip>

Disregarding the fact that the lads from "Ontario, Manitoba, Rhodesia and New South Wales" were in France 3 years before the Americans, and at the invitation of the French government, people have been able to persuade others that it is their greatest privilege "to set out and get themselves killed at the uttermost ends of the earth, with no hope of gain for themselves or their children and almost without their understanding against or for whom they are fighting" since the invention of the pointed stick. The author is just dressing the typical "young men are sent off to fight and don't really know why they are doing it, and so invent a noble reason to do so" rant in some anti-Semitism. Nothing particularly noteworthy or intellectually astounding there, just some hate.

 

[BStrong]

Short answer - none.

Long answer - same as the short answer, but with either Broadway showtunes, or musichall numbers depending on your preferences.



Disregarding the fact that the lads from "Ontario, Manitoba, Rhodesia and New South Wales" were in France 3 years before the Americans, and at the invitation of the French government, people have been able to persuade others that it is their greatest privilege "to set out and get themselves killed at the uttermost ends of the earth, with no hope of gain for themselves or their children and almost without their understanding against or for whom they are fighting" since the invention of the pointed stick. The author is just dressing the typical "young men are sent off to fight and don't really know why they are doing it, and so invent a noble reason to do so" rant in some anti-Semitism. Nothing particularly noteworthy or intellectually astounding there, just some hate.

When you're talking about a demographic that can barely walk upright and use simple tools, any string of words is an astounding achievement.

The pointy-hat club has never been known for their intellectual abilities. The Poet Laureate of that side of the street, William Pierce, writing as " Andrew Macdonald" lifted a bunch of material from Robert Heinlein - from The Puppet Masters and Revolt in 2100 to come up with The Turner Diaries.

Guy couldn't even write a white power wet-dream book on his own abilities.

 

[Hlafordlaes]

Cosmopolitan, modernist, international financier, globalist... whatever the code word du jour, it's what those promoting any structure or ordering of international affairs that disallows pursuit of naked self interest are called. These "heathens and haters of freedom" would deny the god-given rights of the nationalist, never allowing the natural winner to take all, by right. The lamentation and woeful cry that people are being subjugated unfairly is what results from the suggestion they agree to... common rules of play, be it on trade or policy. How sacrilegious! See Trump on the Paris accords, making insane, patently false comments.

Unrestricted, unconstrained, unilateral action in pursuit of pure self interest is the right of the convinced tribalist, according to the authority they conveniently grant themselves. Fetter me not, Jew, libtard, wealth-recycling terrorist! Hands off my stack (but my hands all over all others', by right)!