novaphile
Quester of Doglets
Hmm...
I don't know if it helps, but I recall a case where someone was making threats backed up by a toy gun.
The gun looked real, and the wielder was booked for demanding money with menaces and carrying an offensive weapon.
At the time, the discussion was that the weapon looked real enough for the threat to seem real, and therefore it was offensive.
The definition from the Act was:
An offensive weapon includes, a dangerous weapon, or something made or adapted for offensive purposes, or something that in the circumstances is used, intended to be used, or threatened to be used for offensive purposes (regardless of whether it's ordinarily used for offensive purposes or capable of causing harm).
I can't comment about how common that kind of definition would be, but from the above, the threat doesn't have to be real...
I don't know if it helps, but I recall a case where someone was making threats backed up by a toy gun.
The gun looked real, and the wielder was booked for demanding money with menaces and carrying an offensive weapon.
At the time, the discussion was that the weapon looked real enough for the threat to seem real, and therefore it was offensive.
The definition from the Act was:
An offensive weapon includes, a dangerous weapon, or something made or adapted for offensive purposes, or something that in the circumstances is used, intended to be used, or threatened to be used for offensive purposes (regardless of whether it's ordinarily used for offensive purposes or capable of causing harm).
I can't comment about how common that kind of definition would be, but from the above, the threat doesn't have to be real...