Skeptic Ginger
Nasty Woman
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2005
- Messages
- 96,955
I'm one that takes advice with a grain of salt and I haven't settled on the final structure of my story. Goodness I have a key part in the middle that I've not re-written yet, so there's no reason to hurry on ordering the beginning.Thanks. The paperback, the price of which is set by Createspace, is quite expensive at $11.25, so I'd get the ebook if I were you (unless you met me in person, in which case I sell the paperbacks at a discount since I get them as an author for a reduced price). The cover's nice on the paperback, but there aren't any maps or anything that make it necessary.
I've heard both ways on prologues, but I also used one in "Stolen" (labeled as Chapter One, though). Sometimes there's backstory that just doesn't fit anywhere else. I'd rather not read long retrospectives in the main text, myself, so I tend to throw a bunch of it together into a prologue. Besides, it gave me a better opportunity, in this case, to introduce the father. So, I don't know - prologues don't bother me, personally.
But there's two pieces of advice that seem to be writing circle mantras, no prologues and using 'said' in lieu of any other related word. I don't buy either one. I've read the rationale for both.
I get it the prologues are poorly done in some novels. But it's ludicrous how many people hear, "don't use one", and hear dogma. Don't use a prologue if it risks stopping the reader from reading the rest of the story, sure that makes sense. And it also makes sense that some prologues in some books the reader tends to skip. Hey, if it's some dry 'extra' information, it probably doesn't belong in work of fiction anyway.
But some key thing that happened years before the story starts, so what if you call it a prologue? I think yours worked. And I also liked the backstory in Stolen. Neither took me out of the story. I'll probably call mine chapter one and title it "Seven Years Earlier" just to avoid the dogma opinionators.
Then there's the only use 'said' dogma. I've read the reader supposedly doesn't notice 'said' repeated again and again. I sure notice it when I'm writing. And I never would have given it a second thought reading the beginning of "Cornerstone" that you ignored the convention had I not heard the advice. In other words, I saw no reason using verbs other than 'said' was an issue.
I don't get it. What's with that mantra? Sure, extra adverbs and purple prose, when read, one can see why they don't sound like good writing. But when did using anything but 'said' become an issue?
As for $11.25 vs $4.99, meh. That's actually cheap, even for a paperback. Do you ever sell on EBay? Put an autographed copy up and let me know. I'll buy it.
Or PM me your address and I'll send you a check for one. I'll pay the shipping, of course. That will save us the EBay and PayPal cuts. I want that autographed copy for when you become a famous writer.
Last edited: