• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

What book is everyone reading at the moment? Part 2.

The Miraculous Fever-Tree: Malaria and the Quest for a Cure That Changed the World, Fiammetta Rocco, Harper Collins, 2003. Available as a hardcover and a paperback book, and in an e-pub version.

Rocco is the retired administrator of the International Booker Prize. She grew up in Kenya, the great-great-granddaughter of Philippe Bunau-Varilla, who was involved in both the French and the American construction of the Panama Canal. In addition to providing a meticulous chronicle of the European discovery and use of quinine, she weaves in fascinating bits of her family's history and of their experiences with malaria.

Highly recommended.
 
Crime and Punishment, Fyodor Dostoevsky

Unmarked spoilers follow.
I loved it! One of the best I've ever read.

Finished reading Six Armies In Normandy by John Keegan. Very detailed description of the invasion of Normandy to the liberation of Paris. Almost to detailed for me, atleast with the lack of maps in the book. But highly interesting at some points.

Now back to one of my favourite, Steinbeck. Havent read Travels with Charley so thats my next read.
 
Lives of the Ancient Egyptians, by Toby Wilkinson, Thames & Hudson

100 vignettes of real people sampled throughout Ancient Egypt's 3000 year history. I'm reading it because I'm interested in the daily lives of Egyptians, not just the kings and rulers you hear all about. There are only 9 women in the book, but that's the fault of History, not the author.
 
No More Tears: The Dark Secrets of Johnson & Johnson, Gardner Harris

This nonfiction book is extensively documented, meticulously detailed, and utterly appalling. It’s the story of the pharmaceutical giant, which had modest beginnings as a manufacturer of bandages and cotton, products that exploded with the demand borne of the Civil War. It ventured into patent medicines, and it eventually became beloved by families everywhere with the popularity of its brand of baby powder and of Tylenol.

Unfortunately, the talc in the baby powder included bits and pieces of asbestos and was carcinogenic, both for babies and for women who used the talcum powder for personal freshness. And Tylonol’s recommended dosage is only milliliters from a level that will cause liver failure.

The worst part: the company knew of the dangers and neglected to notify its customers or to correct the problems. The FDA repeatedly tried to intervene, but J&J is immensely rich, and the FDA is chronically scanted in federal funding. The FDA was a David with a sling, attacking a Goliath that was not only a giant, but was armed with a machine gun.

Those two cases are just the tip of a dismal iceberg. The company touted its Covid-19 vaccine, for instance, as being superior to the Pfizer’s and Moderna versions because the J&J iteration required only one vaccination, while the others required two. Unfortunately, the J&J vaccine was only about 50% effective, as opposed to 90% for the competitors—a detail the company declined to acknowledge and fought to conceal. And meanwhile it maintained an army of lawyers and paid substantial bribes to doctors for their testimony that everything J&J was fine, from contaminated talcum to a dangerous analgesic to artificial hips and knees that shed particles of metal that led to operations to repair the damage, and to vaginal mesh that brought on excruciating pain…. The truly horrible participants in these were the surgeons and physicians who knew the truth but wanted the bribes.

The book is a revealing but depressing read, especially now when the FDA and the CDC are sicker than ever. Recommended.



The Old Breed: The Complete Story Revealed, W. Henry Sledge

When Eugene Sledge’s memoir With the Old Breed was accepted for publication, the publishers required it to be no longer than 350 pages. Since Sledge’s manuscript ran to 1100 pages, that meant some drastic cutting (his account of his service in China following V-J Day appeared posthumously as China Marine). His son Henry set out to give readers a fuller account of Eugene Sledge’s service in the Peleliu and Okinawa campaigns, as well as his own memoir of his father’s postwar life as a modest man, a professor of zoology, and, most important, as a dad.

It's a grimly realistic account of a man at war in some of the worst fighting of WWII in the horrible, stinking, death-ridden settings of two Pacific islands. Corporal Sledge lost almost all his close buddies in the conflicts. His unit, K/3/5, too often found itself outnumbered and on the bleeding edge of the front. Henry restores many of the cut sections of his father’s famous memoir, and these include shattering moments: one Marine replacement arrives and is killed by a sniper within five minutes of joining the company; another curiously picks up a Japanese rifle and fatally shoots himself; the son of a Marine whom Eugene comforted as he lay dying from his wounds gets in touch with Henry after Eugene’s death. He’s fifty-two, but he hesitantly explains that he never knew his father. He was born after his dad shipped out. But—and he begins to weep—he thanks Henry because Eugene’s story made him feel for the first time that his father was a wonderful man.

Intercut with the war story is Henry’s memoir of his father. Eugene married in 1952, and Henry came along a few years later. His father had preserved his Marine uniform and mementos of the war. As a boy, Henry asks him to talk about the war, and his father, a naturally gentle man, tells him, because he is also truthful. Was he a hero? No, Eugene says, but he knew heroes.

We glimpse Eugene cursing the memory of Douglas MacArthur, who insisted that the Marines had to take Peleliu to guard his right flank as he led the assault to re-take the Philippines. Eugene recalled bitterly that when MacArthur waded ashore in his “I have returned” moment, not under fire and surrounded by photographers, the Marines were still bogged down in the hellhole of Peleliu. Henry remembers a deeply troubled Eugene watching the news on TV during the Vietnam War, shaken and angry, muttering, “We did this twenty-five years ago so no American boys would ever have to do it again.”

It's a sobering, heart-warming, and wrenching book. If you watched The Pacific, or if you read With the Old Breed, be sure to pick this one up.
 
Last edited:
Lives of the Ancient Egyptians, by Toby Wilkinson, Thames & Hudson

100 vignettes of real people sampled throughout Ancient Egypt's 3000 year history. I'm reading it because I'm interested in the daily lives of Egyptians, not just the kings and rulers you hear all about. There are only 9 women in the book, but that's the fault of History, not the author.
I've recently read some of the papyrus fragments from Oxyrhynchus, they’re mostly very everyday letters, and a fascinating snapshot of Egyptian life from the 3rd century BCE to around 600 CE. Have you seen them? There are pdfs online, some of them searchable, I think you’d find them interesting.
 
I've recently read some of the papyrus fragments from Oxyrhynchus, they’re mostly very everyday letters, and a fascinating snapshot of Egyptian life from the 3rd century BCE to around 600 CE. Have you seen them? There are pdfs online, some of them searchable, I think you’d find them interesting.
Thanks very much, Helen! I'd heard about them years ago in an earlier phase of interest in Ancient Egypt, but I haven't thought to read any this time, but now I will. Nearly 20 volumes have been published since then! Always good to read from as close to the source as you can. The Wikipedia page is interesting too.
 
I was really smug about getting an Only Connect connection with one clue watching an old episode.
The clue was "3rd:Flask". (To get the most points, you would have to get the 4th in the sequence.)
I think for the people here it would be easy but:

The answer is "Captain Ahab". Taking the characters in reverse order of rank on the Pequod. The team got it in one clue, but oddly enough they couldn't remember the name of the ship!
 
A Wodehouse Bestiary, P.G. Wodehouse, edited and with a preface by G.K. Bensen, Foreword by Howard Phipps, Jr.

As well as being a talented novelist and lyricist, P.G. Wodehouse created memorable characters—Jeeves and Wooster, Psmith, Mr. Mulliner, and the zany inhabitants of Blandings—and humor that still provokes laughter. And in addition to all that, he was an animal lover, especially fond of dogs.

This collection selects fourteen short stories, each of which features some species and tons of graceful prose and hilarious situations, people, and critters. Jeeves and Wooster appear in “Sir Roderick Comes to Lunch” (a salmon from Harrods and a small herd or flock of cats), “Comrade Bingo” (Ocean Breeze, a racehorse so slow that he might come in first in the race after the one he’s in), “Jeeves and the Impending Doom” (a fiendish swan whose eyebrows meet in the center), and “Jeeves and the Old School Chum” (More race horses, thought this one presses the outer limit of “bestiary” rather far). All are wonderful, and “Jeeves and the Impending Doom” is splendid.

Blandings Castle is represented by “Pig Hoo-o-o-o-ey!” (the splendidly obese Empress of Blandings, Lord Emsworth’s prize-winning and much-beloved sow), the quintessential tale of man and pig. Freddy Threepwood of Blandings gets involved with a woman who keeps fourteen dogs in “The Go-Getter.’ The loquacious raconteur Mr. Mulliner narrates ‘The Unpleasantness at Bludleigh Court’ (the Peke Reginald, plus -rabbits and ex-rabbits), ‘Something Squishy’ (a snake), “Monkey Business” (a fearsome but talented and quite personable gorilla, once you get to know him), “Open House” (cats, canaries, and other dumb chums), and ‘The Story of Webster” (the cat Webster). Ukridge the entrepreneur starts a college for dogs in, rather naturally, “Ukridge’s Dog College.”

I won’t go through every story, but all are amusing and some are treasures. I must mention “Uncle Fred Flits By,” a glorious tale of confusion in which a gray parrot plays a significant role, and “The Mixer,” narrated by a charming young but inexperienced watchdog.

Dogs, and Pekes in particular, often appear. The foreword, by the President of the New York Zoological Society, recalls Plum’s warmth toward animals and provokes a smile when he mentions that the author is memorialized in the name of the P.G. Wodehouse Shelter in Westhampton, Long Island. Wodehouse and his wife were seldom without a dog—one comfortable dachshund, and many Pekes—and if a man who likes dogs can’t be all bad, a man whom dogs like must be quite good indeed. Recommended.
 
Finished reading The Occupation, by Chloe Adams, Penguin, 2025.
Fictional account of an Australian woman's experience in 1948 alongside the occupation forces, set in Kure and Hiroshima, Japan.

This won the 2024 Penguin Literary Award. I found it contained some beautiful and significant language, and it was a compelling story with difficult truths discussed. One criticism is that one of the main characters, an Australian soldier, is an ugly caricature, though based on historical reports. A counter-character is a thoughtful reporter. There were no "thoughtful soldier" main characters, but perhaps that's the author's point.
 
The Call of the Wild (Jack London 1903)
Only a few chapters in, this appears to be the antithesis to White Fang, which I'd read recently, even though that one was written later. Here, a domesticated dog has to be trained to become wild (a fierce sled dog). In WF, a wild dog has to be trained to become domesticated. Both are done from the dog's point of view, with a lot of mistreatment and brutal violence. Oh, and I skipped the Introduction to this one as well because those damn things always Spoiler a book if you haven't read it before.
 
Last edited:
I've been reading A. E. Housman's collection of poems "A Shropshire Lad", and I find the combination of lively rhythm, black comedy, and depressing themes strangely compelling:

XLIV

Shot? so quick, so clean an ending?
Oh that was right, lad, that was brave:
Yours was not an ill for mending,
'Twas best to take it to the grave.

Oh you had forethought, you could reason,
And saw your road and where it led,
And early wise and brave in season
Put the pistol to your head.

Oh soon, and better so than later
After long disgrace and scorn,
You shot dead the household traitor,
The soul that should not have been born.

Right you guessed the rising morrow
And scorned to tread the mire you must:
Dust's your wages, son of sorrow,
But men may come to worse than dust.

Souls undone, undoing others,-
Long time since the tale began.
You would not live to wrong your brothers:
Oh lad, you died as fits a man.

Now to your grave shall friend and stranger
With ruth and some with envy come:
Undishonoured, clear of danger,
Clean of guilt, pass hence and home.

Turn safe to rest, no dreams, no waking;
And here, man, here's the wreath I've made:
'Tis not a gift that's worth the taking,
But wear it and it will not fade.
 
Good Omens, Terry Pratchett and Neil Gaiman.
Found my autographed copy, started to re-read it, and finished is a day. Lots of wit, clever plotting, and you learn that deep down a evil demon harbours a gleam of good, while at a similar level a kindly angel is just enough of a bastard to be worth knowing. Toss in Armageddon, the final World sending battle between heaven and hell, both of which are well oiled systems organized on the same pattern as the Trump administration, and the story fizzes along.
 
Last edited:
Expedition to Earth (Arthur C. Clarke)
A collection of his short stories. Even though some of these are writting mostly toward the punch line (last line) like in the Harlan Ellison Book I read, the journey here was much more pleasant. Clarke disappears in the writing where Ellison screams "Look at me!" in his. And Clarke is able to visualize amazing things in just a few words.

I finished Call of the Wild and still am mystified as to its lasting impact. The cruelty and viciousness carries through most of it, and as a dog foster I found it a tough go. I went back and read the Foreword and yeah, it told the ending. This makes three of his books I found not to my liking (The other two being The Sea Wolf and White Fang.) I guess he's not going on my list of favorite authors.

I did read a book set in the Gold Rush/Jack London universe a couple years ago (forget the title). It was YA novel and I found it quite compelling. (And Jack London even makes a cameo in it!).
 
Forgotten Disney: Essays on the Lesser-Known Productions, eds. Kathy Marlock Jackson, Carl H. Sederholm, and Mark West

A collection of 22 essays on Disneyana, Forgotten Disney doesn’t quite meet my expectations. “Productions” is a diffuse term for the topics covered, ranging from comic books to clandestine photographs (taken by rogue teen-age park employees) of the Disney theme park exhibit Horizons, from TV productions exploring ethnic issues (“The Nine Lives of Elfego Baca” and “Tonka”) to individual performers who worked now and then for Disney (Bette Davis and Bette Miller) from productions that are not really forgotten, though they might be older (Victory Through Air Power; Destino; 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea).

Stylistically, the essays include ultra-academic efforts, with abstruse terms and phrasing making my eyes glaze over (“…privileging the majority simultaneously deprivileges the historically marginalized, establishing an egregious disproportionality and thus ostensibly linking eleemosynary ends to no-egalitarian processes….”). Not an actual quote, but not far at all from a few of these. Others are close to fannish gushing. Most entries gained my interest, however: One reviews Disney’s final job as a director, “The Golden Touch,” another considers Disney’s (and Mickey’s) take on Lewis Carroll (“Thru the Mirror”). There is a brief account of Disney’s aborted effort to create a film based on Roald Dahl’s book about gremlins (it would have been a one-on-one collaboration) and another reviews Disney’s working together with Salvador Dali, which did, albeit posthumously, see the light as Destino.

Still others lead the reader to online accounts of closed Disneyland/Disney World attractions, to the unsound economic calculations that led to the end of Disney comic books. Another considers the rise and decline of the Disney Renaissance, from The Little Mermaid (big success) through Home on the Range and Chicken Little (non-successes). At its best when it strikes a middle course between highbrow academia and enthusiastic “hey, that ride was sooo fire!”

Sort of hit or miss, but if you’re into Disney, worth a read!
 
Heart of Darkness, Joseph Conrad

Heart of Darkness first appeared as a serial story in three issues of Blackwood’s Magazine, 1899, and in 1902 in a collection of Conrad’s stories. Then in 1917 Conrad revised it and republished it in book form. Since then, many editions have appeared, all with omissions, substitutions, errors, and changes. I just read an ebook that replicates Conrad’s own final revision, and it differs from the one I taught in university courses, sometimes in amusing ways—Conrad’s narrator, Marlow, describes seeing the sprits of moored sailing vessels gleaming in the deep twilight, and some editor along the way thought that was an error and changed it to the “spirits" of the ships. Other alterations include Conrad’s sharpening of descriptions with added sensory details, but editions based on the magazine publication lack those.

Anyway, this one is the author’s preferred text. Conrad paradoxically writes with sharply observed details but keeps facts blurred. Only Charles Marlow and Mr. Kurtz have names, while all the other characters merely have labels: “my aunt,” “the Director of Companies,” “the steersman,” and so on. Even the setting comes off as anonymous. Aboard a moored yawl in the Thames estuary one dusk, waiting for the change of the tide, Marlow tells a small group of his friends the story of the time he became the captain of a river boat in Africa and had the duty of sailing up the “Great River” to the last station to bring home Mr. Kurtz, an artist, explorer, and collector of ivory.

To his horror, Marlow discovers that as far as civilization goes, the people of the unnamed European nation (Belgium) colonizing the African country (the Congo) are perhaps inferior to the natives the whites intimidate, subdue, and indiscriminately enslave or murder. Kurtz, touted by all the Europeans as a genius, turns out to be an evil madman whose terse solution to “the native problem” is “exterminate all the brutes.” By the time Marlow reaches Kurtz's station, the artistic genius has transformed into a brutal dictator who demands his conquered people worship him. In the face of horrible brutality, an agonizing climate, and dire illness, Marlow must confront his own assumptions, examine his conscience, and deal with mortality.

Conrad’s narrator is not Conrad himself, though the author made a similar journey to Africa in 1890 and used that as the germ of the story. Marlow’s language is casually, thoughtlessly racist, and he has no qualms describing the natives as savages. Conrad clearly distances himself from his character. Still, the short novel still makes the reader consider racism, colonialism, and the arrogance of the enlightened parts of the world vis-à-vis the globe’s dark areas. I’d recommend reading Chinua Achebe’s Things Fall Apart together with Heart of Darkness to see the same issues from the other side’s point of view.
 
Re-reading favourites for comfort; working my way through some Pratchett atm, it always works. Such a pity that he stopped writing after Going Postal.
I was going through the audiobooks on Fourble.
 
Diavola, by Jennifer Thorne

I have a habit of browsing some book subreddits, and downloading samples of recommended books to my e-reader. This gives me a chance to try before I buy, which I really appreciate. However, I tend to forget why I grabbed a particular book. What theme or subgenre were we talking about last week? Why were people recommending this book in particular? Etc.

So I have these samples, and I'm not sure why I'm reading them. I'm sure I've DNF'd more than one perfectly cromulent book, because it took too long to hook me in to the main premise or plot. Where "too long" simply means "didn't spell out exactly why I'm here within the first three chapters".

I don't think this is fair to authors, since they have to do something pretty special with their writing to keep me interested long enough to remember why I'm reading their book.

All this to say, Jennifer Thorne made the cut. She did take a while to establish the basis of the plot, but her writing kept me hooked long enough to get there.

It's a haunted house story, but it's also very much about family drama. For me, a lot of the best haunting stories are family drama stories in some way. Whether it's found family, as in Hell House LLC, or blood relatives, as in Incidents Around the House, the way the supernatural curse interacts with the interpersonal issues of the people involved is where the real meat of the story is. Overall, the Evil Dead remake movie was pretty basic, not really worth the squeeze. But one thing I did like about it was the addition of a brother-sister conflict totally unrelated to, but very much affected by, the haunting. (See also, Come Closer, by Sara Gran.)

Similar to zombie apocalypse movies. Act 1 is about dealing with the zombies. Act 2 is about how humans are the real monsters. Act 3 is either some kind of redemption arc for humanity, or else the inevitable destruction the human race for being garbage.

Anyway, Diavola, by Jennifer Thorne. Well written, good plot, a bit of literary depth.

I also thought the ending was a nice corrective, after the disappointing way From Below, by Darcy Coates wrapped up. Someone needs to die, in a horror story. Or at least be badly damaged in some way. Even if it's just the jackass in the ghost-hunting group, who gets what he deserves. Or better yet, the well-meaning leader who gets someone else killed because they made a mistake. Everybody getting away clean completely defangs a horror story.
 
Last edited:
Still rereading old favourites; Angela Carter, Nights at the Circus, so good, so sad that she didn't live and write a little longer. Kate Atkinson is next, Behind the Scenes at the Museum - hilarious and heartbreaking, an incredible first book. So glad she's still writing, she has a very satisfying, distinct style, and she is always engrossing as well as entertaining. And then The God of Small Things, Arundhdati Roy, an outstanding novel, which moved me more than almost any other novel when I first read it. I really like The Ministry of Utmost Happiness as well, and while I very much respect her choice to be a political avtivist/journalist, rather than a full-time novelist, I do wish she would write more novels... Some Swedes that most of you have never heard of (you philistines) are next in line, and then I'm heading back to Pratchett (reading them in chronological order, so the best is yet to come, as the American ambassador to Greece is fond of screaming, but I don't want to risk running out of Pratchetts before my exile is over), mentioning Roy made me yearn for Small Gods.
 

Back
Top Bottom