USS Liberty

Actually Roundhead, once you started posting in the 9/11 area, indicating that you believe "inside job" conspiracy ideas, I decided any information or opinions you provide are not worth accepting or pursuing. On any topic.

Remember, the court of public opinion should be the one you want. Also you should try to make better friends than the 9/11 "Truthers."


The first paragraph in you post says enough about you for me to come to the conclusion your opinion of me is of zero value.

Once you decide what somebody believes is grounds to dislike them, you have shown how inept your reasoning process truly is.

I hold no ill opinion of you, regarding your belief in that the Govt is telling the truth. Especially as there is ample proof this administration has lied to us repeatedly, as have others, instead of telling the truth, which we elect and pay them to do.
 
Last edited:
Actually, you left out a few. I have zero problems with Jews, and plainly stated that, but i do have an extremely unfavorable opinion of the Isreali govt, and that opinion has been held for many years, and through many of they're administrations.
So lets get the facts straight about my opinions, rather thaN miscast them, or outright lie about them.

I am a veteran, love my country, but draw a distinction between love of country and love of administration.
The current administration i have zero love for, they are proven liars, dont represent the views of the majority of Americans(who they are tasked to represent)
Remember, these people work and represent me, not the other way around. The current administration has utterly failed at that. And based on opinion polling, my views represent the mainstream.
I have zero against the Israeli people, nor Americans, obviously, but those who run both countries have issues that arent endearing to me.

Hopefully you are intelligent enough to note the distinctions i raise, above.

And yes, i dont believe the fertilizer bomb did all the damage at OKC. I dont believe the official conspiracy theoty regarding 9/11, and i dont believe the Israeli's attacked the Liberty unaware who they were attacking.

I sleep more soundly at night thinking that if even one person at least digs in to my above opinions because of something i said or typed, ans as a result becomes aware of something he or she might not have otherwise, i have added to whatever it was i accomplished that day.
My perhaps biggest fault is my inability to express myself as well on a keyboard as i can in person. We all have our faults.:D


Believe, i take great solace in the reports of Israeli pilots continually asking for clarification when aware they were attacking our ship. And additionally in the report one pilot actually refused to attack, and was dealt with by Israeli officials.

I have a firm belief all people are basically good, but some in a position of power sometimes use influence to make people do something that is against they're moral convictions. Its a sad truth.

Ah yes, bring up the Holocaust and get the classic long-winded dodge.

Is 6 million (give or take a hundred thousand or so) an accurate figure for the jewish death toll from the Holocaust?
Did the Nazi regime plan and premeditate the Holocaust?
Were gas chambers the weapon of choice for the murders?

You say it's not fair for people who have issues with the Liberty Incident to be called anti-semites. Just say "yes" three times and you can put that issue to bed.
 
Roundhead, I don't like or dislike you. That is your issue, not mine. If you read my post you will see that I don't trust anything you say, because of your support of 9/11 "truth," which I think is a totally bogus movement. (If "movement" is the right term to use.)

I'd like to believe I've been trying to encourage you to refine your use of evidence. By and large, you seem to rely on distant hearsay and rumors. But I understand now that you don't want or need my encouragement.
 
I am a veteran, love my country,... I dont believe the official conspiracy theoty regarding 9/11,

By the way, these two statements are contradictory. They are mutually exclusive and incompatible. The 9/11 truth movement is basically "casual treason". You and the rest are covering up for the enemy, convincing the world the enemy doesn't exist. I see no difference between the antics of the twoofers and Jane Fonda having her photo taken at the controls of a weapon system used to kill her countries airmen. If you people are successful, the jihadists will have another clear shot at our exposed hindquarters and you will have indirectly contributed to the deaths of thousands, maybe even millions of US and allied citizens.

I have a deep respect for those who have served in time of war or manned the ramparts in time of peace but the instant "9/11 was an inside job" escapes your lips, you lose any respect or courtesy I may have otherwise accorded you. I leave it to the families of those who did not come home whether or not to forgive you.
 
Last edited:
Ah yes, bring up the Holocaust and get the classic long-winded dodge.

Is 6 million (give or take a hundred thousand or so) an accurate figure for the jewish death toll from the Holocaust?
Did the Nazi regime plan and premeditate the Holocaust?
Were gas chambers the weapon of choice for the murders?

You say it's not fair for people who have issues with the Liberty Incident to be called anti-semites. Just say "yes" three times and you can put that issue to bed.



What a disgusting post.......


I have no idea, other than published reports, how many Jews perished in death camps at the hands of the Nazi's and Hitler. Millions did.

More than one perishing just because he was a Jew is one to many, imo.

Gas chambers were only one method of Killing the Nazi's used. Guns, medical experiments and others were used as well. I despise any and all of them.

Regarding the Liberty incident, its my take that any coutry that had done the same thing could be substituted, and i would equally despise the incident, and the lack of follow up(and in fact a major coverup by the US regarding the incident) I consider my Govt's abandonment of those sailors just as distastefull, if not more so. Its unpardonable.

Israel is a very unique country as regards the US and world politics. It has by far the biggest and most vocal(and most influential lobby)of any other country in the world as it affects US policy.
There is no changing that, and as i have issue with some Israel policy, it follows it bothers me that a foreign country is so influential in our policy.
It is what it is.
Again, i harbor no ill will toward the Israeli people, or Jews in general, just as i harbor no ill will toward Muslims or Catholics or anybody else.

You seem to equate having a strong distaste towards Israili policy as hating Jews, that makes absolutely no sense to me.

Heck i like Cubans, have met many, but Castro is an idiot.

I guess, to sum it up, i like nobody who doesnt have American citizens interests first and foremost.
 
Last edited:
Roundhead, I don't like or dislike you. That is your issue, not mine. If you read my post you will see that I don't trust anything you say, because of your support of 9/11 "truth," which I think is a totally bogus movement. (If "movement" is the right term to use.)

I'd like to believe I've been trying to encourage you to refine your use of evidence. By and large, you seem to rely on distant hearsay and rumors. But I understand now that you don't want or need my encouragement.

AH, a civil reply:D



Look, i admit to not being the most highly educated person on the planet. My background basically consists of Computer hardware troubleshooting in both the USN and for Wang Labs, and currently as the co-owner of a car dealership.

I am in my early 50's, and not to brag, but have seen and done pretty much anything and everything. Travelled all over the world, both in the service and since, and consider myself to be well above average at evaluating people and coming to the correct conclusions in short order.
The above skills, or lack thereof, are what i bring to the table.

Having really not gotten involved AT ALL regards 9/11 till about 2.5 years ago, i had no reason to doubt the official verdict of events. I mean that sincerely.

I happened to come across a video somewhere that showed 7 coming down and an imploded building coming down, as reference.
I looked at that, thought about it, and quickly came to the conclusion(like anybody with any common sense who has seen it would)that the explanation didnt fit the features of its demise.
I looked around more, and at seemingly every turn, pieces just plain didnt fit. I have become over time, 100% convinced 911 is not described accurately by the official narrative.
I have yet to figure out how exactly the events were orchestrated, and not being privvy to a mountain of evidence that would allow an ironclad conclusion to be drawn, continue to read and study and watch how this plays out.

One little thing that really got my attention a couple of years ago really set my "parity bit"....I believe it was Griffin who was being interviewed by Tucker Carlson on mainstream TV. Griffin had made it known he was going to show the demise of 7, this had been discussed and apparently agreed upon, and didnt happen.

It made me wonder. If a 1/2 hour show was run on like say CBS, and a guy like Griffin was allowed to show 7's demise and show bildings being demolished along with it, what a post show poll of viewers would reveal.
My guess is it would be fatal to the Govt.
For being such a truly hot topic throughout the world, and here in the US, with thousands of websites and chatrooms dedicated to just 9/11, how the MSM cant have an interest in it, if its popularity is so viral.
The answer is of course obvious.
 
AH, a civil reply:D



Look, i admit to not being the most highly educated person on the planet. My background basically consists of Computer hardware troubleshooting in both the USN and for Wang Labs, and currently as the co-owner of a car dealership.

I am in my early 50's, and not to brag, but have seen and done pretty much anything and everything. Travelled all over the world, both in the service and since, and consider myself to be well above average at evaluating people and coming to the correct verdict in short order. My current way of making a living requires the above. I am quite sucessful as a result of that skill.
The above skills, or lack thereof, are what i bring to the table.

Having really not gotten involved AT ALL regards 9/11 till about 2.5 years ago, i had no reason to doubt the official verdict of events. I mean that sincerely.

I happened to come across a video somewhere that showed 7 coming down and an imploded building coming down, as reference.
I looked at that, thought about it, and quickly came to the conclusion(like anybody with any common sense who has seen it would)that the explanation didnt fit the features of its demise.
I looked around more, and at seemingly every turn, pieces just plain didnt fit. I have become over time, 100% convinced 911 is not described accurately by the official narrative.
I have yet to figure out how exactly the events were orchestrated, and not being privvy to a mountain of evidence that would allow an ironclad conclusion to be drawn, continue to read and study and watch how this plays out.

One little thing that really got my attention a couple of years ago really set my "parity bit"....I believe it was Griffin who was being interviewed by Tucker Carlson on mainstream TV. Griffin had made it known he was going to show the demise of 7, this had been discussed and apparently agreed upon, and didnt happen.

It made me wonder. If a 1/2 hour show was run on like say CBS, and a guy like Griffin was allowed to show 7's demise and show buildings being demolished along with it, what a post show poll of viewers would reveal.
My guess is it would be fatal to the Govt.
For being such a truly hot topic throughout the world, and here in the US, with thousands of websites and chatrooms dedicated to just 9/11, how the MSM cant have an interest in it, if its popularity is so viral.
The answer is of course obvious.
At least to me
 
Last edited:
By the way, these two statements are contradictory. They are mutually exclusive and incompatible. The 9/11 truth movement is basically "casual treason". You and the rest are covering up for the enemy, convincing the world the enemy doesn't exist. I see no difference between the antics of the twoofers and Jane Fonda having her photo taken at the controls of a weapon system used to kill her countries airmen. If you people are successful, the jihadists will have another clear shot at our exposed hindquarters and you will have indirectly contributed to the deaths of thousands, maybe even millions of US and allied citizens.

I have a deep respect for those who have served in time of war or manned the ramparts in time of peace but the instant "9/11 was an inside job" escapes your lips, you lose any respect or courtesy I may have otherwise accorded you. I leave it to the families of those who did not come home whether or not to forgive you.


And see, i come to quite a different conclusion.As i believe my govt conspired to perpetrate 9/11, for its own interests, such as an ill advised war based on untruths against a country who had zero to do with 9/11. Iraq.And fooolishly, oil and resources. Pity even that didnt work out, or at least evidently wont.
Only an event like 9/11 could have galvanised the American public to follow along with such a folly.
It certainly isnt the first time innocent Americans were sacrificed to further a governmental aim, but hopefully its the last.
I see a large number of victims families behind seeking the truth, wherever that might lead, some such as the Jersey Girls and others less vocal. I feel for those people, shouting to the very commision set up to get to the bottom of this mess, that so many question fell on deaf ears, or just plain were ignored.
I leave my views for God to decide, but i can assure you, my beliefs regarding 9/11 surely wont scare me come judgement day, to the contrary, i think God will give me a brownie point in that area.

My hero's are guys like Pepper, who in no uncertain terms uncovered one of just many Govt lies, the death of MLK, a true patriot.
My only hope is that a groundswell of intelligence will develope, so that, once again, our govt will answer only to the best interests of its citizens, and the Constitution it was founded on.
 
Last edited:
AH, a civil reply:D



Look, i admit to not being the most highly educated person on the planet. My background basically consists of Computer hardware troubleshooting in both the USN and for Wang Labs, and currently as the co-owner of a car dealership.

I am in my early 50's, and not to brag, but have seen and done pretty much anything and everything. Travelled all over the world, both in the service and since, and consider myself to be well above average at evaluating people and coming to the correct conclusions in short order.
The above skills, or lack thereof, are what i bring to the table.

Having really not gotten involved AT ALL regards 9/11 till about 2.5 years ago, i had no reason to doubt the official verdict of events. I mean that sincerely.

I happened to come across a video somewhere that showed 7 coming down and an imploded building coming down, as reference.
I looked at that, thought about it, and quickly came to the conclusion(like anybody with any common sense who has seen it would)that the explanation didnt fit the features of its demise.
I looked around more, and at seemingly every turn, pieces just plain didnt fit. I have become over time, 100% convinced 911 is not described accurately by the official narrative.
I have yet to figure out how exactly the events were orchestrated, and not being privvy to a mountain of evidence that would allow an ironclad conclusion to be drawn, continue to read and study and watch how this plays out.

One little thing that really got my attention a couple of years ago really set my "parity bit"....I believe it was Griffin who was being interviewed by Tucker Carlson on mainstream TV. Griffin had made it known he was going to show the demise of 7, this had been discussed and apparently agreed upon, and didnt happen.

It made me wonder. If a 1/2 hour show was run on like say CBS, and a guy like Griffin was allowed to show 7's demise and show bildings being demolished along with it, what a post show poll of viewers would reveal.
My guess is it would be fatal to the Govt.
For being such a truly hot topic throughout the world, and here in the US, with thousands of websites and chatrooms dedicated to just 9/11, how the MSM cant have an interest in it, if its popularity is so viral.
The answer is of course obvious.

Replied to in the appropriate sub-forum.
 
I have no idea, other than published reports, how many Jews perished in death camps at the hands of the Nazi's and Hitler. Millions did.

How many millions, Roundhead?

Seems to me he already answered. I know, I know, this is the conspiracy forum and we must always assume that anyone who holds crank views is a lunatic anti-semitic neo-Nazi (redundant?).
I'm sure there's a logical fallacy in asking irrelevent questions to smear your opponent though. Poisoning the well maybe?
 
Last edited:
How many millions, Roundhead?

Sword Of Truth, you would do better sticking to arguments surrounding facts and details instead of going at Roundhead's credibility.

Roundhead seems to do this, so why don't you.

Attacking a person's "credibility" is better left for the courtroom, because in logic, it is simply fallacious.
 
Sword Of Truth, you would do better sticking to arguments surrounding facts and details instead of going at Roundhead's credibility.

Roundhead seems to do this, so why don't you.

Attacking a person's "credibility" is better left for the courtroom, because in logic, it is simply fallacious.

There is little I can do to roundheads credibility that he hasn't already done himself.
 
To put even an finer point on the already overwhelming evidence the Israeli attack on the Liberty was intentional, i cite the "Salans Memorandum" on the incident.
Carl Salans was the legal advisor to the US Secretary of State. Per the Secretary's request,Salans compared the reports of the Israeli Judge, the Naval Court of Inquiry, and the Clifford report, and issued these findings, among others.

This report in full can be found at, among other places....http://www.gtr5.com/evidence/salans.htm


"The Israeli report states that the initial speed of the target reported by the torpedo boat commander at 1341 hours as 30 knots was verified within minutes and confirmed as a speed of 28 knots. The report notes that it was the speed of the target which led to the final conclusion that there was no reason for surmising that the target could possibly be the Liberty.

The reported speed would have ruled out the "El Kasir" as the target, as well as the Liberty since the top speed of the "Kasir", published in Janes Fighting Ships, is in the range of 14 knots. The Liberty's top speed is 18 knots"



"The Israeli report emphasizes that the attack originated with reports that the El Arish area was being shelled from the sea. The implication of such reports was obviously that a ship capable of such shelling was present in the immediate offshore area, i.e., within gun range of the shore.

It would be clear to any trained observer that the armament aboard the Liberty was incapable of shore bombardment. It appears nevertheless that neither the aircraft, torpedo boats, nor the command headquarters to which they presumably reported evaluated the ship's capability for shore bombardment."




IV. Attack by Torpedo Boat After "Do Not Attack" Order

The Israeli report confirms that during the final attack by aircraft the marking "CPR-5" was noted on the hull and an order was transmitted to the torpedo boat division not to attack. The order was recorded in the log book of the flag boat at approximately 1420 hours. The torpedo boats nevertheless began their attack run at approximately 1428. The Division Commander later "claimed that no such message ever reached him." The Deputy Commander testified that "he received the message and passed it on to the Division Commander."



V. Flag and Identification Markings

The Israeli report indicates that the fighter aircraft which reportedly made an initial pass over the Liberty was looking for a flag but found none; likewise no other identification mark was observed. "...Throughout the contact no American or any other flag appeared on the ship...." (Elsewhere the report had indicated that at 1055 the ship had been identified as the Liberty "whose marking was GTR-5.")

The Navy inquiry confirms by testimony of five members of the crew that they had personally observed the Ensign flying during the entire morning and up until the air attack. The Ensign was subsequently shot away during the air attack. Before the torpedo attack, a second Ensign was hoisted. The Navy report also found that "hull markings were clear and freshly painted."

The Clifford report noted that "the Liberty's U.S. Navy's distinguishing letters and number were painted clearly on her bow. The Liberty's name was clearly painted in English on her stern. The ship's configuration and her standard markings were clearly sufficient for reconnaissance aircraft and waterborne vessels to identify her correctly...." The report noted that at all times prior to the air attack the Liberty was flying her normal size American flag (5 ft. by 8 ft.) at the masthead.

Five minutes prior to the attack by the torpedo boats, the Liberty put up a flag measuring 7 ft. by 13 ft. to replace the flag which had been shot down in the air attack.




Anybody who truly believes with ANY sincerity the attack wasnt intentional, is beyond the realm of sanity.
 
You cite the same points over and over from different sources as if they somehow change or become new. The torpedo boats returned fire after the Liberty, they did not open fire; assuming Israeli regulations even called for the recon planes to evaluate armament on a potential target, not doing so is a case of incompetence, not conpsiracy; and again, it does not matter a lick that the American sailors knew what was painted on their hull, all that matters is what the Israeli planes saw. And to prove this, you need a bit more than transcripts someone said someone who might have seen them told them about.
 
Bump.

Great thread, worth reviving and let UNLoVed rebel have his back. Why didn't you guys tell me what a good thread this was? Fuleair, I had no idea, Quicknthedead, strong argument, much respect, and an actual Liberty Survivor (we must presume anyhoo). Wow. Why is it not tagged and searchable as USS Liberty here at an educational forum? Someone should fix that.

[I’m particularly interested in someone employing these techniques in analyzing the research of Jay Cristol as codified in his book, The Liberty Incident

[FONT=&quot]Warmest regards,[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]Joe Meadors[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]USS Liberty Survivor[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]joe@ussliberty.com[/FONT]

A much belated welcome, sir!

It's a long thread, did anyone take a close look at Cristol's work? That would be interesting.

You assume much here. I suggest you pop to a few of my posts on Israel and Israelis before making that assumption - because I was around when it happened and heard about it at the time and have seen/heard/read about it very much over the 41 years since it happened - and I am 90%* certain that it was known (that it was a US ship) to the Israelis at the time of the attacks- but I am in no way anti-Semitic and loathe those who are. I don't know the two guys who are agreeing on this - and I have no idea why now - but that they bring it up does not make them anti-semitic to me. They will have to go beyond this for that to happen.


*Two years ago I was 100% certain.

This guy, sounds human to me. :thumbsup:
 
Last edited:
Actually Roundhead, once you started posting in the 9/11 area, indicating that you believe "inside job" conspiracy ideas, I decided any information or opinions you provide are not worth accepting or pursuing. On any topic.

What if I seconded them? Would you give it a thought then? What on here is not troubling to you and the friendly fire fantasy? (Great work here, Roundhead, I'm quite surprised to be honest)

So here is what we have, thus far.


Every crewmember has said the flag was flying and was visible

Israel says it wasnt.

Israel has admitted it knew the ship was in the area the day before.

Israel has admitted the ship was there that morning, that it was on the situation board, and that its "presence"was forgotten or misplaced on the board.

Numerous intelligence types working for the US at the time have stated they saw transcripts of the attack and heard Israeli pilots questioning ATC after noting the ship was American.

The EC-121 guy stating he heard the attacks going on, taped them, his navigator noted him screaming into the planes intercom regarding this, his hearing the American flag mentioned and the attack continuing. His firm ststement that at least two tapes are missing that he recorded and turned into officials after they touched down.

The intercepted cable of an Israeli agent stating we knew Israel attacked on purpose and had identified the ship.

The findings of the Moorer Commision, and its composition of highly regarded militry officers...including the reviewing officer of the Naval Inquiry(Adm Staring)among others.

The Cheif petty officer who listened in on communications between the White House and 6TH fleet, turning our air assets around who were on the way to help.From Morocco.

The hastily arranged Court of Inquiry (held 10 DAYS after the incident), which interviewed only 14 crewmen, and despite its request, no Israeli's.
The fact the reviewing officer WOULDNT sign off on its outcome.

The fact victims families were told it was an accident BEFORE THE INQUIRY WAS EVEN OVER. That should clearly speak to how important getting to the truth was.


These few points alone, and i have chosen only some, leave no doubt the attack was intentional.

Lemme guess - 'ever since you started praising Roundhead...'
 
Cool, someone got a tag on here. SDC, challenge stands, if you care to address anything. All else: Apologies for going off here on two different threads now, and for having succumbed to that ‘weird energy’ thing. With this mini-essay I’ll go silent as well until someone else speaks up (aside from roundhead). So I’d been harping on the issue over at UnloVed Rebel’s thread, hoping to get a good discussion going and see if any rational JREF members would be able to admit there is at least cause for grave concern here. I was frustrated less by the faith-based coincidence theorizing I saw than by the lack of interest – just a few members took the time to even tell me I was wrong. But this old thread contains the battle I missed – it feels like – well, the smoking deck of a warship that’s just seen serious battle. Little wonder so few are eager to revive the discussion. It was more pitched than I’d expect.

Those who argue essentially the Israeli case with at least more than a drive-by one-liner dismissal: Gumboot, Kookbreaker, Dave Rogers, MRC Hans, Doctor Evil, van dutch, SDC, and the rest… wanted to thank everyone who stepped up and added to the discussion. Kudos, some genuine food for thought that the other side might want to go back and reconsider.

Those who can clearly see the implausibility of the accident upon accident story - with their own blinspots, of course: Quicknthedead, fuelair, jmeadors, a unique person, Darth Rotor, Cpt. Fantastic, Magz, and of course Roundhead. Thankfully, not one appearance from D Charmichael. Many of these are not of the standard CT crowd, though my knowledge of each’s posting history is limited. It’s fairly mixed company to be in - I was a little surprised.

But then again, the same basic sentiments can be found stated outside the intertubes by former CIA and NSA directors, CNO/CincPAC/CinCUS/CJCS, State Department, White House, Navy, Airforce, and intelligence people at different levels, pretty unanimously the survivors who were the only ones (on this side) that saw it firsthand, That’s a lot of buzz for something a few erred sailors made up to explain away the horror of friendly fire – some smart people cannot accept that, and it’s reflected here at the forum as well.

Aside from the startling number of intelligent, non-kooky people who side with the Liberty crew, another striking thing is the seriousness with which the “nutters” here take the issue. We see essays rebutted with bumper stickers and links to the same old pro-Israel sites spewing the same slender thread of tired half-truths.

Perhaps most troubling is the polarization of opinions. I’ve seen roughly zero people say “I honestly don’t understand the issue, I’ve heard some evidence that’s troubling, but I can’t see the motive, and I’d like to learn more.” No, everyone who knows enough to say anything seems to have it all figured out. How many members at this forum? That's how many ears and how many fingers plugged in 'em?

I have to say I don’t have it all figured out – like with my Pearl Harbor investigation, I’m finding this case more ambiguous than it at first seemed. There's the evidence, partial tho it is, showing no orders to sink the American ship or anything like that. There's past precedent for friendly fire incidents to call on, and there's the fact that Israel "admitted" to a "mistake" they themselves proposed as an explanation. Oh, and paid someone some money. I’m willing to concede that at least some witness memories may well be warped, and then reinforced into mantras – guys will perhaps clearly recall seeing something they only heard someone else say they saw, and so on… There's the almost over-done ‘under-the-breath’ complaints from Washington insiders, on top of the curious string of American blunders that made the IDF’s blunderkrieg attack possible.

In short, both sides - case not closed. This is not yet 'conspiracy fact,' nor is 'eveything explained.' The ‘conspiracy theory’ just won’t die, some are alarmed to learn. I’m reminded of an old SNL skit with a Condor, IIRC, that smacked into someone’s deck and was injured – mortally, they decided. They decided to be merciful and finish it off with a baseball bat, but the bird just won’t die, with blood everywhere, like 100 blows. It was uncomfortable funny, stuck with me, and pops up here – if the ting just won’t die, shouldn’t you ask yourself whether it should? Do you keep hitting it and trying to ‘’finish it off,’ or stop, wrap it in towels, and get it to the hospital?
 
The liberty was deliberately attacked by the Israelis. They knew it was an american ship on account of the american flag waving in the distance. LBJ and the Israeli governemnt wanted it to look like Egypt attacked the liberty and get america on Israels side just like 9/11 and during the cold war.

If you want to know the facts behind the liberty watch http://www.911missinglinks.com/
 

Back
Top Bottom