• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Undue burden? Texas' plunging abortion numbers

Puppycow

Penultimate Amazing
Joined
Jan 9, 2003
Messages
31,999
Location
Yokohama, Japan
Plunging numbers of Texas abortions: Are clinic closings behind decline?

It seems pretty obvious that the closings probably have something to do with it.


Texas abortion clinics performed 9,000 fewer abortions in the first full year after the state enacted tough new regulations on abortion clinics, providing some of the first hard data in what the Supreme Court has called the state’s “controlled experiment” in tightening abortion access for American women.

The plunging number of Texas abortions comes amid a notable drop in abortions around the US.

In general, states with open access to abortion are seeing declines similar to states with laws curtailing clinic access. But while the Associated Press found that abortions decreased by 12 percent across the US since 2010, the Texas rate dropped by 30 percent in the same span.
Critics say a raft of new abortion-restrictive laws are pushing the statistics down, highlighting how those lost in the legal and cultural jumble tend to be the most vulnerable residents, including so-called “Janes”: poor, rural women and teenagers.
Even so, the abortion decline in Texas is sharpening the constitutional focus on whether creating requirements that clinics can’t meet constitutes an “undue burden” on a women’s right to choose – especially given that 30 US states have enacted nearly 300 abortion restrictions since 2011.

Kind of illustrates why who gets to fill the next Supreme Court vacancy is crucial. It's not just Texas.
 
Plunging numbers of Texas abortions: Are clinic closings behind decline?

It seems pretty obvious that the closings probably have something to do with it.




Kind of illustrates why who gets to fill the next Supreme Court vacancy is crucial. It's not just Texas.

After I read the title of your post, the opening statement, and the cited material, I was all set to complain that there already was a thread covering the points you were making. Then I finished your post and saw that you hid the topic in the last sentence. I prefer my topics in the title.

In any case, are there US citizens who are not aware that the next appointment is crucial? OK, let me rephrase that, of the Americans who know what a Supreme Court appointment is, are there any who do not understand how profound the immediate and long-term effects may be?

ETA
I withdraw the question. I know some politically savvy liberals who do not know that a faction of the Republican Party want the Supreme Court to overturn Roe v Wade and are waiting for just the right mix of justices to bring a test case.

As for me, I am going to spend the rest of the day exerting mental energy into the goal of NOT thinking about who President Trump might appoint. [shudder]
 
Last edited:
This was already argued before the court, no new appointee could vote on this.
 
I hope the court approves the theory that substantial restrictions forcing long distance travel (or even interstate travel) effectively denies a right.

I hope they expand this to more rights while they're at it, like San Francisco slapping such massive burdens on gun shops they must close or move outside the city. And other rights as well.
 
I hope the court approves the theory that substantial restrictions forcing long distance travel (or even interstate travel) effectively denies a right.

There might be a racist component to all this as well, based on the travel issue. I'm supposing that access to abortion services was restricted preferentially in rural, white-dominated areas and not so much in urban areas with higher concentrations of minorities. If that's so, you have abortions going down among white women and remaining largely the same among black and Hispanic women.

Sounds like grist for the conspiracy mill, but it requires a certain subtlety of thinking on the Texas legislature's part - an attribute which collides with the dumb redneck stereotype.
 
There might be a racist component to all this as well, based on the travel issue. I'm supposing that access to abortion services was restricted preferentially in rural, white-dominated areas and not so much in urban areas with higher concentrations of minorities. If that's so, you have abortions going down among white women and remaining largely the same among black and Hispanic women.

Sounds like grist for the conspiracy mill, but it requires a certain subtlety of thinking on the Texas legislature's part - an attribute which collides with the dumb redneck stereotype.

They are not dumb but they are racist murderous scumsucking ******** with no regard for anyone not as corrupt as they and their filth ridden ilk are : republickers!!! They and their like are why I consider republickers as I do.
 
They are not dumb but they are racist murderous scumsucking ******** with no regard for anyone not as corrupt as they and their filth ridden ilk are : republickers!!! They and their like are why I consider republickers as I do.

You know, if more caring individuals would join the Republican Party, things could swing the other way. The power is in your hands.
 
Then there was the hugely successful ban on funding planned parenthood in texas. That successfully drove down contraception and STI screening rates in the poor. Heck of a Job Texas!
 
You know, if more caring individuals would join the Republican Party, things could swing the other way. The power is in your hands.

Yeah! Kind of like a Log Cabin Republican, but gay for centralized economic command and control.
 
You know, if more caring individuals would join the Republican Party, things could swing the other way. The power is in your hands.

If republickers could go back to how many were before 1980, that might happen - but, very frankly, I do not think I will ever live to see it. They went way too religious oriented and way too wealthy people oriented and worked to destroy unions and decent paying American jobs and I have no reason to believe they will ever go back . (There are many more points, but these are by themselves sufficient for me.)
 
On the bright side, we can watch the crime rates in Texas over the next 25 years and see if the Freakonomics guys were right.
 
It could be that women are just holding off having their abortions until after the election - as a protest.
 
Meanwhile maternal mortality in Texas has nearly doubled:

Texas has highest maternal mortality rate in developed world, study finds

The rate of Texas women who died from complications related to pregnancy doubled from 2010 to 2014, a new study has found, for an estimated maternal mortality rate that is unmatched in any other state and the rest of the developed world.

Doubled in the space of 4 years. Doubled.

From 2000 to the end of 2010, Texas’s estimated maternal mortality rate hovered between 17.7 and 18.6 per 100,000 births. But after 2010, that rate had leaped to 33 deaths per 100,000, and in 2014 it was 35.8. Between 2010 and 2014, more than 600 women died for reasons related to their pregnancies.

No other state saw a comparable increase.

In the wake of the report, reproductive health advocates are blaming the increase on Republican-led budget cuts that decimated the ranks of Texas’s reproductive healthcare clinics. In 2011, just as the spike began, the Texas state legislature cut $73.6m from the state’s family planning budget of $111.5m. The two-thirds cut forced more than 80 family planning clinics to shut down across the state. The remaining clinics managed to provide services – such as low-cost or free birth control, cancer screenings and well-woman exams – to only half as many women as before.

At the same time, Texas eliminated all Planned Parenthood clinics – whether or not they provided abortion services – from the state program that provides poor women with preventive healthcare. Previously, Planned Parenthood clinics in Texas offered cancer screenings and contraception to more than 130,000 women.

. . .

Indeed, the report said it was “puzzling” that Texas’s maternal mortality rate rose only modestly from 2000 to 2010 before doubling between 2011 and 2012. The researchers, hailing from the University of Maryland, Boston University’s school of public health and Stanford University’s medical school, called for further study. But they noted that starting in 2011, Texas drastically reduced the number of women’s health clinics within its borders.

The doubling appears to coincide with the closing of lots of women’s health clinics in the State of Texas. Possibly leading to hundreds of excess deaths. It's not just abortion that is being affected here, it is also the other health services those clinics provided. Some of them didn't even provide abortions.
 
Outrageous as it is that a bunch of old christian men have control over women to this extent in 2016 ...


You do realize, don't you, that those "old christian men" were elected in part by women voters. Furthermore, according to this Gallup poll from 2014, 41% of American women reported being pro-life.

if the argument in regards to abortion is presented as being 'men against women' then it is a false claim. There are plenty of women who are also against abortion (but it seems these women are ignored, as if they don't exist, and their views don't count).
 
You do realize, don't you, that those "old christian men" were elected in part by women voters. Furthermore, according to this Gallup poll from 2014, 41% of American women reported being pro-life.

if the argument in regards to abortion is presented as being 'men against women' then it is a false claim. There are plenty of women who are also against abortion (but it seems these women are ignored, as if they don't exist, and their views don't count).

I just wonder what percentage of those women think about their own abortion as being different.
 
Interestingly Texas is rated 38th amongst US states for gender equality, and 42nd by political empowerment.
 

Back
Top Bottom