• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Understanding the Liberal Mindset

427 Cobra said:
If, less than a year before the 2022 Texas gubernatorial election, Beto O'Rourke was charged with multiple crimes by a Midland TX DA that ran on a platform of getting Beto, would you believe the charges? Would you believe the convictions if the judge was a known RNC contributor and the jury was stacked with Republicans?

How about if different charges were then generated in Odessa TX? Then Abilene?

If a woman came forward and charged Beto with sexual assault in a public changing room, without evidence, had the civil trial in Amarillo TX with a stacked judge and jury, would you believe the verdict? Even if the woman could not remember the date and time, or any details?
Click to expand...
Trump was convicted by a jury. I've read the transcripts and the Judge's 50+ page decision. His CFO was convicted not once, but twice of perjuring himself to protect Trump. Not to mention his pension. His business was also convicted of criminal fraud. . Multiple times. As was his foundation. Do you think it is appropriate to lie to your creditors and tax authorities? Not once, not twice, not three times, but countless times? Do you think it's appropriate to buy a piece of property for 17 million dollars and report the value a year later to your creditors it is worth a 120 million dollars? And at the same time tell tax authorities it's worth 3 million?

Do you think espionage should be prosecuted? How about obstruction of justice? How about attempting to subvert elections?
Have you read the voluminous evidence for the countless crimes Trump has been accused of? As well as the few, (like 70) he was charged with?

My guess is you haven't. You refuse to and just don't care. He's the guy your tribe supports and that is enough.

The only thing I actually question may not be true was the incident at Bloomingdales. Not that it was or wasn't true. Just that it is questionable.

Does all this suggest that you're a weirdo MAGA sycophant? Maybe not. But it certainly demonstrates you don't think the laws apply to Trump.
 
Last edited:
When I was at school I was told that a sycophant is somebody who only tells the leader flattery, and what he wants to hear. Plenty of sycophants around Trump, but i wouldn't think people who don't have access to Trump can be sycophants.
 
steenkh said:
When I was at school I was told that a sycophant is somebody who only tells the leader flattery, and what he wants to hear. Plenty of sycophants around Trump, but i wouldn't think people who don't have access to Trump can be sycophants.
Click to expand...
You're correct. I'm not exactly sure what you call these people that ignore the facts when it doesn't support their narrative.
 
steenkh said:
When I was at school I was told that a sycophant is somebody who only tells the leader flattery, and what he wants to hear. Plenty of sycophants around Trump, but i wouldn't think people who don't have access to Trump can be sycophants.
Click to expand...

Well, I don't know if that's true or not, but my definition is...

FROM: dictionary.cambridge.org/

"A sycophant is defined as a person who praises important or powerful individuals in a way that is not sincere, often in order to gain favor or advantage."

Using that definition, I think a sycophant gets an advantage by using their mindless belief as a reason to put down the liberal/progressive mindset (of some) who don't like the fat clown, but as always, that's just my opinion.

Your mileage may vary oif course.
 
Last edited:
AmyStrange said:
FROM: dictionary.cambridge.org/

"A sycophant is defined as a person who praises important or powerful individuals in a way that is not sincere, often in order to gain favor or advantage."
Click to expand...
My mileage says that the sycophants gets an advantage with the leader by addressing the leader. This is not about the advantage they have in dealing with opponents.
 
steenkh said:
My mileage says that the sycophants gets an advantage with the leader by addressing the leader. This is not about the advantage they have in dealing with opponents.
Click to expand...

I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree, but thanks for your opinion, and besides, using sycophant (instead of worshipper) will confuse the hell out of the uneducated ones, because they have no idea what it means, even if they look it up.

Confusing maga weirdoes is so damn easy and so much fun too.


ETA: FROM: thefreedictionary.com

A sycophant is a person who uses flattery to win favour from influential people or BEHAVES in a servile manner.

Servile: obsequious or fawning in attitude or behaviour; submissive


Maga weirdo sycophants are definitely fawning and submissive to the fat-clown who they consider their leader---whether it's to their advantage or not.

After all, I'll bet there are people out there who will believe his lies even if those same lies hurt them. I've actually had conversations with some of them who have no problem with his tariffs because they believe it will all work out in the end.

And just to keep this on topic, let me add that the only thing most liberal/progressive mindsets are subservient to are facts and the truth, but all this is just my opinion, and of course, you know the rest.
 
Last edited:
Safe-Keeper said:
btw, I was wondering where all the trumpkins had gone. Turns out they're all in this thread where they can fairly safely ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ about liberals and 'woke' without having to grapple with more serious themes and topics, or where they'd have to contend with and answer for the terrible things Dump is actually doing? Okay. Hope they're having fun🙄.
Click to expand...
So any criticism of the left means you are a Trump supporter? That is the vibe I am getting from you.
 
dudalb said:
So any criticism of the left means you are a Trump supporter? That is the vibe I am getting from you.
Click to expand...

I don't know about Safe-Keeper, but most of the criticism I've seen here in ISF (towards those who are definitely not fans of the fat clown) has been a vile hatred based on some kind of love and worship of the fat jackass, and the stupid crap he says, believes, does, and lies about, but that's just my opinion.

Your mileage may vary of course.

And FYI, I'm a registered Republican who just happens to have a liberal/progressive mindset, and I don't care for the stupid idiot either.

How about you? What's your mindset?


ETA And BTW, I agree with Safe-Keeper.
 
Last edited:
dudalb said:
So any criticism of the left means you are a Trump supporter? That is the vibe I am getting from you.
Click to expand...

It depends, is the criticism hypocritical? Is the person that's being critical only critical against the left? Is the person criticizing also a "centrist" that only seems to come out of the woodwork to "both sides" every topic, despite it being a false equivalence?

Context matters kids!
 
smartcooky said:
Liberal Progressives (Lib-Progs) consider themselves as the bastions of Social Justice. They claim to believe in each individual's right to an autonomous, self-directed life, free from restrictions. They claim to believe in freedom of speech, arguing that is it an important part of challenging existing ideas and finding truth. Lib-Progs have an absoluteness about their mindset. They are utterly convinced they are always the good guys, that they are the final arbiter of right and wrong, and that anyone who doesn't think the way they do are the bad guys. They are also utterly convinced that they, and only they, know what's best for society. They operate on the basis of the "victim v oppressor framework" which views social dynamics via a sort of "binary" consisting of the powerful groups (the oppressors) versus the marginalized groups (the victims). In the Lib-Prog world, everyone but them is either one or the other - everyone is either a victim or an oppressor, and the Lib-Progs are here equalize everyone and make everything alright. They are fantasists, the ultimate expression of idealism. These are indeed lofty ideals, but sadly, the reality of the Liberal Progressive mindset is somewhat different from their stated ideals.

Their claim to believe in each individual's rights falls flat when it comes to any right that doesn't comport their mindset.
Their claim to believe in free speech only applies to speech they like. Speech they don't like must be restricted, and its speaker punished.

There is nothing that demonstrates how the Lib-Prog mindset works (and exposes its deep flaws) better than their relationship with Israel and the Palestinian Arabs in Gaza and the West Bank. British Commentator Melanie Phillips currently writes on social issues for The Times and The Jerusalem Post from a socially conservative perspective.

(Lib-Progs will dutifully obey their echo-chambers and dismiss her as a far-right racist without ever reading anything she has written or hearing anything she has to say)

There is a transcript below the link for those who are allergic to YouTube videos.


TRANSCRIPT​
The Western liberal mind conceives of itself as being good because it's Liberal. The Western liberal tells him or herself "I'm a good person because I'm Liberal - I'm Liberal because I'm a good person" which means that I believe in things like the Brotherhood of Man,
Edited by jimbob: 
snipped for rule 4
Click to expand...
That certainly was a massive dose of sweeping generalizations. That's just for the first sentence. I'm sure it gets worse from there.
 
Trausti said:
Perhaps a facet of the contemporary liberal mindset is a pathological inability to discuss any topic without reference to the God Emperor.
Click to expand...

Perhaps it's because the fat clown is a pathological liar, a brainless hater, a stupid idiot to the core, has no empathy, living in a delusional fantasy world of his own making, and couldn't tell the truth even if his life depended on it (and his maga weirdo worshippers are even worse).

All those rankle any truth seeking liberal/progressive mindset like mine.

BTW, you're the one that brought it up this time, but go ahead and blame it on someone else... something that the fat jackass does every single day.
 
Last edited:
427 Cobra said:
If, less than a year before the 2022 Texas gubernatorial election, Beto O'Rourke was charged with multiple crimes by a Midland TX DA that ran on a platform of getting Beto, would you believe the charges? Would you believe the convictions if the judge was a known RNC contributor and the jury was stacked with Republicans?

How about if different charges were then generated in Odessa TX? Then Abilene?

If a woman came forward and charged Beto with sexual assault in a public changing room, without evidence, had the civil trial in Amarillo TX with a stacked judge and jury, would you believe the verdict? Even if the woman could not remember the date and time, or any details?
Click to expand...

The only thing less convincing than arguing a conspiracy theory is arguing a theoretical version of a conspiracy theory.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom