Understanding False Flag operations

[Norman Alexander]

It seems only practical that False Flag theorists could then say....Now that 'they' achieved the buy-back, the false flagged mass shootings are no longer useful.

Do you even understand why we would be laughing while backing out of the room carefully if someone actually said that in all seriousness?

 

[Bubba]

Do you even understand why we would be laughing while backing out of the room carefully if someone actually said that in all seriousness?

Really ? Seriously?

Benefit of doubt.....maybe you missed "hypothetical" ..(not an unusual oversight)

In the hypothetical it was that a covert program would be routinely discontinued after its goal is achieved.

Should be easy. It was a hypothetical.

This is why I propose hypothetical scenarios.
Sadly I find some here incapable of engaging them.

What wouldn't conscious intelligent people get about that hypothetical ?
Perhaps you mis-read it.

Wait, unless maybe you are from a different system?

You have my apology if you somehow misunderstood, but now get it....

Otherwise....try look again

by Bubba View Post
It seems only practical that False Flag theorists could then say....Now that 'they' achieved the buy-back, the false flagged mass shootings are no longer useful.

If you ran a covert operation, would you stop it, after it succeeded, ?

Simple enough IMO. Sometimes I think you guys are somehow blind.

 

[HotRodDeluxe]

Simple enough IMO. Sometimes I think you guys are somehow blind.

Really? You keep moving goal posts and responding with nonsense when you don't understand.

One minute, the five shootings before the buy back are false flags, and when I give you an example out of that five that obviously was not a false flag, you shift the goal posts.

Furthermore, it is clear that you have never done any media studies, nor do you understand how journalism works.

How can there be a decent 'thought exercise' when faced with these limitations on your behalf?

 

[Norman Alexander]

Really ? Seriously?

Benefit of doubt.....maybe you missed "hypothetical" ..(not an unusual oversight)

In the hypothetical it was that a covert program would be routinely discontinued after its goal is achieved.

Should be easy. It was a hypothetical.

This is why I propose hypothetical scenarios.
Sadly I find some here incapable of engaging this one.

What wouldn't conscious intelligent people get about that hypothetical ?
Perhaps you mis-read it.

Wait, unless maybe you are from a different system?

You have my apology if you somehow misunderstood, but now get it....

Otherwise....try look again





If you ran a covert operation, would you stop it, after it succeeded, ?

Simple enough IMO. Sometimes I think you guys are somehow blind.

I understand in baseball that three strikes and you're out. You've just had a half-dozen or more swishes for free and not one even came close to connecting. So why don't you just put down the bat and go back to the dugout. You aren't cut out for this game.

 

[Bubba]

Cannot do hypothetical?

No, I'm sure you could.

 

[Bubba]

So, you don't understand my posts? I thought so. Oh, well....maybe next time you'll get it.

So Wrong.

 

[Bubba]

Covert ops would end once goal is achieved;

Do you even understand why we would be laughing while backing out of the room carefully if someone actually said that in all seriousness?

Try again.

 

[Norman Alexander]

Cannot do hypothetical?

No, I'm sure you could.

Any hypothetical you propose is not a substitute for facts that actually happened.

I can hypothesize that it was all a plot by the USA government to make us completely unarmed so they can invade us tomorrow and make us the 53rd state of the union. Then we will all have to learn to speak English with a southern twang, and paint ourselves orange like the great God Trump.

So yes, I can do hypotheticals. It's fun! But you still struck out badly.

 

[HotRodDeluxe]

So Wrong.

I don't think so. Your responses clearly denote that you have completely missed my points.

Again for you:

Really? You keep moving goal posts and responding with nonsense when you don't understand. One minute, the five shootings before the buy back are false flags, and when I give you an example out of that five that obviously was not a false flag, you shift the goal posts. Furthermore, it is clear that you have never done any media studies, nor do you understand how journalism works. How can there be a decent 'thought exercise' when faced with these limitations on your behalf?

 

[mgardner]

It has become evident that some commentators here have little clear idea what the full meaning of the term False Flag now is . Wikipedia provides some help -- see following -- but completely misses a key component . . The missing part in this explanation is one that covers operational intent

So you agree with what others have said about your writing style - that you use this term in your own special non-standard way, to mean something other then what is typically meant by the term.