Merged UFO @ Jerusalem, 2011. Call Captain-D

EDIT: That's weird, I'm sure I wasn't posting in this thread.
 
Angel Love said:
You don't need to be an expert to see things. Video 3, obvious fake, just look at it. For the others, look at them, read what others say, then look at them again, see if you agree, if not say why not. I can't see anything in Stray Cats videos and post that are only understandable to "experts", there are even some things I might not agree on.
Click to expand...

This isn't just seeing things. I don't know anything about interlaced and progressive scans for example. Can you explain something is a cgi in a video by just looking at it?

And what are these things you might not agree on out of curiosity?
 
Akhenaten said:
I'm more suspicious that it's "You can't prove that all videos are real/faked therefore 9/11 was faked."
Click to expand...
Or 'if we can't accept a video/videos as proof of a UFO, we can't accept a video/videos as proof of what happened on 9/11' would be my guess. kageki?
 
kageki said:
Akhenaten said:
Ooh, please, Sir! I know this one!
Click to expand...


You don't need to be called on to say something.
Click to expand...


No, I don't. I have an 'Automatic' setting.


kageki said:
Out of curiosity, are you an expert on videos?
Click to expand...


Yep. I've seen thousands of them. Here's one of my favourites:


​


That's what a real spaceship looks like when it takes off. Cool, n'est-ce pas?

Notice how it looks just like the Jerusalem UFO didn't.
 
The Pig said:
Akhenaten said:
I'm more suspicious that it's "You can't prove that all videos are real/faked therefore 9/11 was faked."
Click to expand...


Or 'if we can't accept a video/videos as proof of a UFO, we can't accept a video/videos as proof of what happened on 9/11' would be my guess. kageki?
Click to expand...


Our inquisitive friend seems oddly silent on this speculation.
 
One of the really cool things about it is that the interlaced frames colour separate into RGB... I've never seen that effect before. Thanks. :)
 
Stray Cat said:
One of the really cool things about it is that the interlaced frames colour separate into RGB... I've never seen that effect before. Thanks. :)
Click to expand...
.
Somewhere in all the crap I have here is some video of shooting water bottles.
In any one frame, the interlacing shows up as a oscillation between the two scans.
Something like the pressure wave of the bullet pushing the cap off the bottle is interesting, with all the position changes of the bottle and the cap.
Must put some effort into finding that, I guess.
But here's another artifact of video.. this time a CMOS imager that scans down the scene, line by line. The frame rate of the camera used (Aiptek) is 1/7th of a second. Makes images of moving objects into art... :)
 

Attachments

  • AiptekTejonPathRide10.jpg
    AiptekTejonPathRide10.jpg
    140.9 KB · Views: 7
  • AiptekShutterScan02.jpg
    AiptekShutterScan02.jpg
    82.4 KB · Views: 1
  • AiptekWiggles-01.jpg
    AiptekWiggles-01.jpg
    155.6 KB · Views: 6
The one of the locomotive reminds me of that classic black and white photo of a racing car.
 
Bell said:
The one of the locomotive reminds me of that classic black and white photo of a racing car.
Click to expand...
.
I was on my 10-speed going to the left, the train going to the right...
The wiggles in the fence line are not an on-the-spot image of an earthquake~ ;)
 
I've just read a bit of his blog... the phrase 'loser' seems like projection to me.

But, I'm all ears for this evidence as to why we're wrong.
 
Moved a bunch of posts that were about the posting of an email address - we're looking into it and if everything seems OK we'll return the posts.

Sorry for the interruption and we'll now resume service as usual.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Darat
 
Just thought I'd clue you up with the latest developments in the Jerusalem UFO hoax.... errrr... I mean sighting. :D

The latest bit of "evidence" to emerge is another WooTube video, this time taken from the Jerusalem Weather Cam (they have a website here)

Which claims the light can be seen in the weathercam picture for 28th January at just before 1am.

But if anyone wants to spend a few minutes looking though the weathercam pictures, you can clearly see the light (from a building) comes and goes quite often regardless of which 24 hour period you choose to look at (they have archives going back to 2008).

How far will people stretch credulity to maintain a belief in this?

Answers on the back of a twenty pound note should be sent to:
Mr Stray Cat
Squid Fishing Monthly
Iwontstandinyour Way
Rockthis Town
Route 66
 
Stray Cat said:
How far will people stretch credulity to maintain a belief in this?
Click to expand...


20ExtraordinaryPounds.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom