angrysoba
Philosophile
Your appeal to incredulity is noted.
How many of these allegations would need to be proven true, for you to change your mind?
Anyway, at least we agree that these are things the US government shouldn't be funding.
Here's one:
resident Donald Trump's administration and his supporters have turned their eyes to media outlets paid by federal agencies, promoted by a misleading claim this week that the USAID had spent $8 million on subscriptions to news outlet Politico.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt shared a poorly researched claim that the aid agency, which the Trump administration wants to shutter, spent $8 million, when that amount was for subscriptions across all federal agencies.
Link
Are you going to now argue that actually USAID did so give 8 million dollars to
Besides, much of these types of expenditures for subscriptions were on publically available databases.
For example,
A post on X, formerly Twitter, by Elon Musk, posted on February 5, 2025, viewed 14 million times, highlighted another post by conservative comentator Ian Miles Cheong, that said: "The US Government gave the New York Times tens of millions of dollars over just the past 5 years despite paying relatively little money to the NYT in the years preceding 2021. For instance, in August 2024, the US government awarded $4.1 million to the NYT.
Searching for "New York Times" returns unrelated spending for other institutions that include the words "New York" in some part of the spending entry. They include grants to The Research Foundation for the State University of New York, New York University and the New York Genome Center Inc.
The results also show spending records for more than 17 years.
Besides, I wouldn't even call Ian Miles Cheong a "conservative". He's just a MAGA-pilled moron.
This whole thing is such a slurry of garbage information that the more appropriate stance is to be incredulous rather than credulous. You do yourself no favours by lapping up this crap.
Last edited:

