• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Trump's Second Term

MAHA

Brooke Rollins: "We've run over 1,000 simulations. It can cost around $3 a meal for a piece of chicken, a piece of broccoli, corn tortilla, and one other thing. So there is a way to do this that actually will save the average American consumer money."

Been doing something like that since your smelly boss's first term you silly ◊◊◊◊.*

* F-word, not C-word.
 
Last edited:
Yes. It is. It is very literally "The LAW of the Land." It is meant to be inviolate.
How bad is your reading comprehension? I didn't say "it". I said "he". As in Trump. As in the subject of the second sentence of yours that I quoted. As in NOT the constitution, the subject of your first sentence.
 
This is not a serious accusation, and doesn't need to be taken seriously. Basically all of your complaints could be applied to many different presidents, not just Trump. There are serious arguments to be made about whether to and how much to constrain presidential power in general. But you're not making those arguments. You're engaged in special pleading. When Trump does something controversial, you act like he's the first president who has ever done it, but that's simply not true. For example, military strikes on "civilian" targets? Where have you been for the past two decades? That's become routine. You can complain about that if you want to, but at least be honest and admit that every president in recent history did it.

Claiming that Trump's military circling around and slaughtering men in the middle of the ocean without any proven evidence of wrongdoing, is somehow on par with what past Presidents have done, is disingenuous at best, and exactly the hypocrisy I pointed out before. You know the post where you said I was lying.

Jesus Christ you guys are in a cult man, wake the ◊◊◊◊ up. You're just going to keep defending the terrible ◊◊◊◊ this administration is going to do? Just live on your knees worshipping some ◊◊◊◊ stick that's ruining the Republican party? Is the GOP ever going to grow a spine?
 
Nobody ever complained about Bush's wars?
That's not what I said.
There is a MAJOR difference between past presidential actions, and this current fascist regime:

Gitmo WAS shutdown, and the individual perpetrators WERE prosecuted.
Who was prosecuted for Obama's wedding drone strike? Nobody. Who was prosecuted for the drone strike that killed a 16 year old American citizen? Nobody.
Nobody excuses Bill Clinton for having sex with an intern.
You must have amnesia. Pretty much the entire Democratic establishment excused Bill Clinton for having sex with an intern.
At least Monica was a grown adult and not a ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ CHILD! And she likely consented, if it even occurred at all.
*If* it even occurred?

Wow. You're in even deeper than I though.
 
Claiming that Trump's military circling around and slaughtering men in the middle of the ocean without any proven evidence of wrongdoing, is somehow on par with what past Presidents have done, is disingenuous at best
Why is the ocean relevant? It's not. It's an irrelevant detail used for special pleading, to try to distinguish it from Obama's drone strikes. And what proven evidence did Obama have for his various drone strikes? None. In fact, we know that some of those strikes were a mistake, because they admitted they were a mistake.

If you want to complain about such strikes in general, go for it. But stop pretending it's something new. It isn't. And pretending it is is just hypocrisy.
 
Interesting, because normally they don't check testesterone levels unless the patient has an issue that might be caused by a low testesterone level.
Personally I think it's just the Rights obsession with Testosterone = Masculinity, 'Low T' has been pushed by Alt-Med and BroScience for a while, hence Soy-Boy as an insult. Even Tucker Carlson was toasting his testicles in the name of improving testosterone levels
 
The executive branch sends unaccountable goons into the streets to detain and kill those who criticize them, shots missiles at Caribbean fishermen for Twitter likes, coerces broadcasters who criticize them, threatens to impose martial law, threatens to invade our allies, attempts to cut funding for cities that do things they dislike... but a few school meals got their funding cut. "Wow, so small!"

The absolute foolishness needed to believe this stuff...
 
The executive branch sends unaccountable goons into the streets to detain and kill those who criticize them
No, they don't. This is simply delusional.
shots missiles at Caribbean fishermen for Twitter likes
"Fishermen". Sure. Pull the other one.
attempts to cut funding for cities that do things they dislike...
The federal government routinely uses the threat of funding cuts in order to get states to do what it wants. Do you know why the drinking age is 21? There's no actual federal law for that. That's the result of a threat to withhold funding.
 
No, they don't. This is simply delusional.
1. Last week, one of them murdered someone.
2. There are multiple videos of it.
3. The administration is cheering him on,
4. And actively working to obstruct any attempt at prosecution.

Which of those four do you disagree with?

"Fishermen". Sure. Pull the other one.
Go ahead and list all the evidence that they were running drugs. "The government told me so" would be an ironic citation from you.
 
The federal government routinely uses the threat of funding cuts in order to get states to do what it wants. Do you know why the drinking age is 21? There's no actual federal law for that. That's the result of a threat to withhold funding.
By the way, you should do some research on what you're defending before you wade in on this topic. The actual quote from Trump was:
Starting Feb. 1, we’re not making any payments to sanctuary cities or states having sanctuary cities, because they do everything possible to protect criminals at the expense of American citizens and it breeds fraud and crime and all of the other problems that come
Any payments. That's not similar to the drinking age minimum. The government tells you this stuff and you mindlessly repeat it. It's like a zombie movie where the infected people turn into obnoxious liars (but still just as brainless).
 
1. Last week, one of them murdered someone.
2. There are multiple videos of it.
3. The administration is cheering him on,
4. And actively working to obstruct any attempt at prosecution.

Which of those four do you disagree with?


Go ahead and list all the evidence that they were running drugs. "The government told me so" would be an ironic citation from you.
Even if they were running drugs, that doesn't make murdering them legal.
 
Trump to Reuters about the midterm elections:

He boasted that he had accomplished so much that "When you think of it, we shouldn't even have an election."

MANAGING MIDTERM EXPECTATIONS

The president expressed frustration that his Republican Party could lose control of the U.S. House of Representatives or the Senate in this year's midterm elections, citing historical trends that have seen the party in power lose seats in the second year of a presidency.

"It's some deep psychological thing, but when you win the presidency, you don't win the midterms," Trump said. He boasted that he had accomplished so much that "when you think of it, we shouldn't even have an election."

 
Last edited:
Trump to Reuters about the midterm elections:

He boasted that he had accomplished so much that "When you think of it, we shouldn't even have an election."



I saw this and thought "self-snitching 'ey?" Then I thought some more and realized his stupid cultists are nodding in slavish agreement. Insurrection Act? Sure! Martial law? Why not! Suspend mid-terms? Bestest president evah!
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom