• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Trump's nickname.

- Tweeter Twit
- Putin's Mini Me
- Tangerine Scream
- Orange-u-tan
- Wet Nappy
- Whiner-In-Chief
- Baby Pootus
- Me Me Me-ssolini


I have a fresh new box of crayons sitting in front of me... I could do this all day long.
 
I agree with Upchurch. There is ABSOLUTELY nothing homophobic about it.
Then both of you are wrong.

I DONT care what two consenting adults together. Whatever gets your freak on is ok by me. As long as it doesn't hurt ...well hurt me. You can hurt each other if that is your thing.

Yeah, except you want them to stay in their place and not be president. Anything else you don't want them doing? Can they be elected to Congress? If so, then why exclude them from the presidency?
 
- Tweeter Twit
- Putin's Mini Me
- Tangerine Scream
- Orange-u-tan
- Wet Nappy
- Whiner-In-Chief
- Baby Pootus
- Me Me Me-ssolini


I have a fresh new box of crayons sitting in front of me... I could do this all day long.

Those are some good ones.
 
Yeah, except you want them to stay in their place and not be president. Anything else you don't want them doing? Can they be elected to Congress? If so, then why exclude them from the presidency?

Nope. I dont care if they become President or Congress critters or Supreme Court Justices. I absolutely don't care. Barney Frank would have received my vote every election.

I do care that the President of the United States is on all fours when meeting meeting with the Russian President. I do care that he met alone with the Russian President for two hours and then sided with Vlad instead of the US intelligence community.

That says very clearly that one person is dominated by the other. The homosexual community would say that Putin is the pitcher in this relationship. Not just me.
 
Frankly I am not one who uses sexual metaphors to describe others, but those who do so to suggest Putin is dominant over Trump are not necessarily homophobic. The core of the intended insult is the demeaning unequal nature of the relationship, not necessarily the fact that both participants are men. It could be just as much an insult in the context of a straight relationship. e.g. "PM May came to power through Russia's Brexit campaign and now is just Putin's little b---h."

Having said that of course I have no idea what is actually in the minds of the people using these metaphor.
 
Frankly I am not one who uses sexual metaphors to describe others, but those who do so to suggest Putin is dominant over Trump are not necessarily homophobic. The core of the intended insult is the demeaning unequal nature of the relationship, not necessarily the fact that both participants are men. It could be just as much an insult in the context of a straight relationship. e.g. "PM May came to power through Russia's Brexit campaign and now is just Putin's little b---h."

Having said that of course I have no idea what is actually in the minds of the people using these metaphor.

The example you just gave was misogynistic as hell.

C'mon folks, this ain't that difficult.
 
Meh.

It's just their way of throwing straw around the room in a desperate hope of trying to deflect the thread subject into a completely different direction.

Luckily for most us, we have functioning brain cells to help veer us away from taking the bait.
No, it's not. I loathe Trump, but I think the continual disparagement of those who choose to be bottoms is distasteful.

Different folks, different strokes. These insults suggest that some folks are lesser because of their sexual preferences.
 
I agree with Upchurch. There is ABSOLUTELY nothing homophobic about it. I DONT care what two consenting adults together. Whatever gets your freak on is ok by me. As long as it doesn't hurt ...well hurt me. You can hurt each other if that is your thing.

But I do care that Putin and Trump's master slave relationship has geopolitical ramifications that effects the rest of us. I care very much that the President of the United States is weak and submissive with the Russian President. I care very much Trump is Putin's bottom to Vlad's top.

If one has a problem with this insinuation, well I guess they need to develop a sense of humor and pay attention to the weak pathetic obsequious performance of Trump in Helsinki. It was damn embarrassing.
The master-slave relationship would do.
 
Frankly I am not one who uses sexual metaphors to describe others, but those who do so to suggest Putin is dominant over Trump are not necessarily homophobic. The core of the intended insult is the demeaning unequal nature of the relationship, not necessarily the fact that both participants are men. It could be just as much an insult in the context of a straight relationship. e.g. "PM May came to power through Russia's Brexit campaign and now is just Putin's little b---h."

Having said that of course I have no idea what is actually in the minds of the people using these metaphor.


But abcbytesla said he didn't want subs to be President. No hint of metaphor in that statement.
 
No, it's not. I loathe Trump, but I think the continual disparagement of those who choose to be bottoms is distasteful.

Different folks, different strokes. These insults suggest that some folks are lesser because of their sexual preferences.

Now that I fully agree with. It is an insult to certain people's preferences in sexual practices, not to their preferences in sexual partners.
 
I do care that the President of the United States is on all fours when meeting meeting with the Russian President. I do care that he met alone with the Russian President for two hours and then sided with Vlad instead of the US intelligence community.

That says very clearly that one person is dominated by the other. The homosexual community would say that Putin is the pitcher in this relationship. Not just me.

Since your comment implies that you witnessed the meeting and were privy to the discussions that took place, can you elaborate so the rest of the forum can better understand your POV?
 
It's not homophobic, it's just how to pick insults.

If you perceive someone whom you don't like to be bragging about his heterosexual exploits, then to accuse him of engaging in homosexual activities would be most likely to arouse his anger, which would be the point of the insult.

Has nothing to do with fear of the gays
 
Since your comment implies that you witnessed the meeting and were privy to the discussions that took place, can you elaborate so the rest of the forum can better understand your POV?

I of course didn't witness the meeting. Only the effect of the meeting.

Trump allowed Russia and Putin to dominate him and in turn the USA.
 

Back
Top Bottom