• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Cont: Trump et al continued “2020 election” conspiracy theories

Status
Not open for further replies.
Here's my prediction. Before the trial, police will find Lindell dead and Sidney Powell, passed out under him, naked in a room in an Econo Lodge, traces of two lines of blow on her ass.
 
La Jolla resident Dinesh D'Souza Launches '2000 Mules' Film Through

According to the filmmaker: “The documentary film created by Dinesh D’Souza, exposes widespread, coordinated voter fraud in the 2020 election, sufficient to change the overall outcome. Drawing on research provided by the election integrity group True the Vote, “2000 Mules” offers two types of evidence: geotracking and video. The geotracking evidence, based on a database of 10 trillion cell phone pings, exposes an elaborate network of paid professional operatives called mules delivering fraudulent and illegal votes to mail-in dropboxes in the five key states where the election was decided. Video evidence, obtained from official surveillance cameras installed by the states themselves, confirms the geotracking evidence. The movie concludes by exploring numerous ways to prevent the fraud from happening again.”

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/tech...e-virtual-showing-saturday-evening/ar-AAX1FHJ
 
My understanding is that most –- perhaps all? –- states require security cameras at drop boxes, but that many states ignore that requirement. Some states that do have cameras are withholding their video. And Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) requests are being ignored, as is typical.

I belong to the Mike Huckabee mailing list. He's sending around this claim. Does anyone know anything about it?
 
I belong to the Mike Huckabee mailing list. He's sending around this claim. Does anyone know anything about it?

It seems questionable, since elections are run by the state, and there's no consistency with rules. You'd have to look at each state to see what it requires.

There's a lot of postured outrage over ballot drop boxes lately.
 
La Jolla resident Dinesh D'Souza Launches '2000 Mules' Film Through

According to the filmmaker: “The documentary film created by Dinesh D’Souza, exposes widespread, coordinated voter fraud in the 2020 election, sufficient to change the overall outcome. Drawing on research provided by the election integrity group True the Vote, “2000 Mules” offers two types of evidence: geotracking and video. The geotracking evidence, based on a database of 10 trillion cell phone pings, exposes an elaborate network of paid professional operatives called mules delivering fraudulent and illegal votes to mail-in dropboxes in the five key states where the election was decided. Video evidence, obtained from official surveillance cameras installed by the states themselves, confirms the geotracking evidence. The movie concludes by exploring numerous ways to prevent the fraud from happening again.”

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/tech...e-virtual-showing-saturday-evening/ar-AAX1FHJ

Apparently, it is mostly conjecture Frankensteined together from inconclusive evidence. A.K.A., the CT-ist's blueprint.

https://www.denverpost.com/2022/05/08/2000-mules-fact-check/

Preview:

CLAIM: At least 2,000 “mules” were paid to illegally collect ballots and deliver them to drop boxes in key swing states ahead of the 2020 presidential election.

THE FACTS: True the Vote didn’t prove this. The finding is based on false assumptions about the precision of cellphone tracking data and the reasons that someone might drop off multiple ballots, according to experts.
 
Apparently, it is mostly conjecture Frankensteined together from inconclusive evidence. A.K.A., the CT-ist's blueprint.



https://www.denverpost.com/2022/05/08/2000-mules-fact-check/



Preview:
Yes, amidst a gauntlet of geolocation mumbo jumbo, they have some grainy footage, but don't mention that all such instances occurred in jurisdictions that allow cohabitants and/or family members to do so.

That's about it. Not even up to Project Veritas standards, really.
 
Hillary got 65 million votes in 2016, but Obama got 4 million above that in 2008: 69 million, and he did so by winning 873 counties. However, magically, Biden broke Obama's record by a whopping 12 million votes while winning only 537 counties, *334* fewer counties than Obama won. Never, ever in U.S. history has there been such a gigantic disparity between a presidential candidate's alleged vote total and his number of counties won. Never. Not once. Not even close.

Leaving aside the impossible turnout numbers that were initially reported--but then hurriedly "corrected"--in many suspect counties, there are only two innocent explanations for the gigantic, unprecedented disparity between Biden's alleged vote total and his number of counties won: (1) there was a massive migration into many or all of the 537 counties that Biden won, or (2) there was a staggering increase in voter turnout large enough to overcome Trump's 12-million increase in votes, to overcome the substantial increase in Trump's share of four major minority voting blocks, and to overcome Biden's loss of 336 counties that Obama won in 2008.
 
Are you just going to seagull in more debunked nonsense or are you actually going to answer the responses you already got?


Hillary got 65 million votes in 2016, but Obama got 4 million above that in 2008: 69 million, and he did so by winning 873 counties. However, magically, Biden broke Obama's record by a whopping 12 million votes while winning only 537 counties, *334* fewer counties than Obama won. Never, ever in U.S. history has there been such a gigantic disparity between a presidential candidate's alleged vote total and his number of counties won. Never. Not once. Not even close.

Obama won more counties because he had cross appeal. Those extra counties he won? He just scraped by a number of them.

What Biden did was win fewer counties but much more decidedly

Your cry "never ever" falls pretty flat. We've seen plenty of "never evers"

electoral_precedent.png


Leaving aside the impossible turnout numbers that were initially reported--but then hurriedly "corrected"--in many suspect counties, there are only two innocent explanations for the gigantic, unprecedented disparity between Biden's alleged vote total and his number of counties won: (1) there was a massive migration into many or all of the 537 counties that Biden won, or (2) there was a staggering increase in voter turnout large enough to overcome Trump's 12-million increase in votes, to overcome the substantial increase in Trump's share of four major minority voting blocks, and to overcome Biden's loss of 336 counties that Obama won in 2008.

Or the simple fact that winning a bunch of empty, featureless counties means very little. This is like when Pubbies and MAGAhats drool over the map that shows Trump wins by county that makes the US look red until you realize some counties have voter figures in the hundreds, at best.

You fail, again.
 
Hillary got 65 million votes in 2016, but Obama got 4 million above that in 2008: 69 million, and he did so by winning 873 counties. However, magically, Biden broke Obama's record by a whopping 12 million votes while winning only 537 counties, *334* fewer counties than Obama won. Never, ever in U.S. history has there been such a gigantic disparity between a presidential candidate's alleged vote total and his number of counties won. Never. Not once. Not even close.

Never in US history has there been a president that people wanted to vote out as much as Trump. It makes sense to me that there was a large voter turnout -- Trump had created a huge division in the country. Voter numbers are a lot lower when people aren't stirred up.
 
[qimg]https://s3files.core77.com/blog/images/960537_81_90771_DrdO3qFgW.gif[/qimg]
That's a cool gif.

People also need to consider more than half the voting public saw how corrupt and incompetent Rump was/is and voting him out was a big election draw.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom