• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Cont: Today's Mass Shooting (part 3)

"It was among 97 mass shootings so far this year in the United States, with four or more people wounded or killed, not including shooters, according to Gun Violence Archive."

Sigh... I agree in principle with gun control, not being born or raised in the US, but I suspect it wouldn't be the solution that some people think it is.
Of course it would, it's not a quick fix and it would take decades to become effective as the problem has been decades in its creation and cannot be fixed overnight.
 
Sigh... I agree in principle with gun control, not being born or raised in the US, but I suspect it wouldn't be the solution that some people think it is.
It doesn't have to be a 100% solution right off the bat. It just needs to make things better than they are now. Moving in the right direction. Fewer gun deaths. Zero gun deaths is a longer-term goal.
 
First time for everything. Perhaps it's because you've been called out.

How wrong you are.

This post from early April there were Latino shooters.

It's funny how you imply that I only mention black shooters. I've been accused of the same thing by other members before so I will challenge you, as I have with the others, to provide an example of me ignoring a white shooter. The only time you will possibly find an example is because there was no information publicly available at the time of my last search.

So put up or shut up. Bring the examples.

ETA: Just a few days ago Norman Alexander quoted me saying "black terrorists." Like you, he attributed something to me that never happened. Like you, he was wrong. I don't expect a correction from either one of you, that's the 'skeptic' way.
 
Last edited:
"I don't just blame blacks! Look, I blame Latinos as well!"

White supremacists are about the only people you don't blame.

False.
I blame white supremacists only when white supremacists are the ones doing the mass shootings.
I blame blacks only when blacks are the ones doing the mass shootings.
I blame Latinos only when Latinos are the ones doing mass shootings.
I blame trannys only when trannys are the ones doing mass shootings.
I blame Asians only when Asians are the ones doing mass shootings.
I blame whites only when whites are the ones doing mass shootings.

You seem to have a hard time understanding that blacks commit the overwhelming majority of mass shootings while whites are a very small proportion.

So far this year there have been seven mass shootings with double-digit body counts. Of the seven, suspects have been arrested, killed or identified in four of them. . None of them have been white.
 
I'm feeling like blaming the shooter as an individual is the smarter move than blaming whatever group you declare them representative of.
 
I'm feeling like blaming the shooter as an individual is the smarter move than blaming whatever group you declare them representative of.
Nah. Blacks are just inherently violent and more prone to mass shootings. It's in their blood. Haven't you read The Bell Curve?
 
Nah. Blacks are just inherently violent and more prone to mass shootings. It's in their blood. Haven't you read The Bell Curve?

Fortunately we have people like you to tell us that the vast over-representation of blacks in the violent crime rates, including murder and rape, is really because of white racism, right?
 
Nah. Blacks are just inherently violent and more prone to mass shootings. It's in their blood. Haven't you read The Bell Curve?

Sure haven't. Does it address your accusations that I'm ignoring certain types of shootings?

No, just more deflection?
 
Sure haven't. Does it address your accusations that I'm ignoring certain types of shootings?
You're not ignoring them. Conceded. But you are also not engaging any discussion about the mass shootings you bring up. So why do it? What you are doing is spelling out the statistics in long form, with no interest in them beyond the color of their skin.

Can we be ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ done with this? The mass shootings you post are almost invariably the results of arguments, family slaughters, or (apparently) gang activity. In short, the people know each other, and their activity is limited to their social groups. When we talk about mass shootings, we are normally referring to a killer semi/randomly shooting strangers. No personal involvement, that the general population has to be wary of. The people in your stories are not taking a sniping perch in a Las Vegas hotel or taking an AR to school or marching into a grocery store or bowling alley and cracking off rounds at people they have no issues with.

Can we simply acknowledge the distinction so that things can get out of this endless screen saver? It's not "driving your point home" to post about an argument at a bar that results in multiple casualties, likely by accident. That's a phenomenon worth discussing in it's own right (deadly violence as a means of resolving relatively petty interpersonal disagreements), but as long as you don't engage any discussion beyond the race of the shooters, you're wearing a persona big and bold that is prohibitive of anything constructive being talked about.
 
Last edited:
Poisoning the well much? Strawmanning too?
Strawmanning? No. It happens on this board frequently. Poverty, slavery, redlining, food deserts, malnutrition, school to prison pipeline, systematic systems of institutional racism, etc. All of which are laid directly at the feet of white racism, white supremacy or white majority.
 
Last edited:
Can we be ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ done with this?

No. I'll continue to post the double-digit mass shootings as a reminder to everyone that the random retard-culture mass shootings are a much greater danger to the public than the rare white supremacist mass shooting or 'white boy gone crazy' mass shooting.
 
No. I'll continue to post the double-digit mass shootings as a reminder to everyone that the random retard-culture mass shootings are a much greater danger to the public than the rare white supremacist mass shooting or 'white boy gone crazy' mass shooting.
Dude. You know you are creating the exact opposite impression that you are trying to portray, right? You aren't coming off as the voice of fact and reason here.
 
Dude. You know you are creating the exact opposite impression that you are trying to portray, right? You aren't coming off as the voice of fact and reason here.
Fact and reason on this site??? That's ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ laughable!
 
Fact and reason on this site??? That's ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ laughable!
I agree that your point is not being addressed by others. But that's not really their fault at this point, man. You went way too far without anything but "check it out- them darkies at it again".

Turn it around. Make the conversation go where there is one to be had without this silliness it devolved to.
 
I agree that your point is not being addressed by others. But that's not really their fault at this point, man. You went way too far without anything but "check it out- them darkies at it again".

Turn it around. Make the conversation go where there is one to be had without this silliness it devolved to.

I tried that approach a long time ago, It didn't work then, it won't work now.

I will continue using this current approach because I believe it is the most effective method for the amount of effort I'm willing to put out.

I'm thinking any extra effort will go to the "school shooting" thread, do some narrative shattering there as well.
 

Back
Top Bottom