Time Travel Chronicles

[Edy_P]

Mid 1990s 386 PC and power source

Extracts from member’s Qs & As (WBD website Study Area), used with permission.

>Why did they take back a 386 personal desktop computer ?

It was the minimum system that would run the four particular cd-roms.

At some time in the future, someone was going to notice that the images from a certain cd-rom that run on a certain computer match to the described imagery by nearly all the ancient prophets.

If a different type of computer was taken back to the past each time, then there would not be a consistent trail of clues documented in ancient texts that could be traced back (forward) to a particular computer system.
As Pegg was using the same type of computer and cd-roms that were documented in ancient texts, it was easy for him to identify the technology being described and the contents of the cd-roms.


>Where was the electricity source to power computers in the ancient world ?

It is surmized that if the technology was available to make and send a time machine, chrononauts, and a computer back in time, then it would be a relative simple matter to power an older style computer.

It was explained that Noah's Ark was a computer carry and storage box. The computer fitted into the smaller end, while the 200 x 50 x 30 cm end contains enough space for a series of batteries that would be able to power a computer.

 

[Edy_P]

replies

He was given two tables of stone (ie. 2 compact disks), and utilized a miraculous staff (mouse & cable).
(Comments) “I think even a complete idiot of those times would recognize that a CD wasn't made of stone. And how the heck does a mouse and cable get described as a wand?”

The ancient person knew what he was describing, and in Hebrew has done so quite well.
It is the translation into English that has covered over the original meanings, thus modern people reading the English Bible are being told a different series of events to those that were originally documented by Hebrew scribes.

Exodus 24:12 “tables of stone”. Let’s check in Strong’s Concordance – Hebrew Lexicon.
Hebrew word # 3871 “tables” comes from a root meaning of ‘to glisten’ with the given meaning ‘a tablet (as polished)’ of stone, wood, or metal – with Hebrew renderings of ‘board; plate; table’.

So the English word “tables” originally meant in an Hebrew rendering ‘a polished plate (that glistens)’.

H-word #68 “stone” has a rendering of ‘head-stone’.

The Ancients cd-rom IS a polished plate that glistens (on the back), and has an image of a head on it (a face) – thus literally, a head-stone. The Hebrew description (using original Hebrew meanings) fits.

Hebrew word #4731 “staff” also means ‘rod’; and from the electronic CD-Rom version The Holy Bible, Media Graphics International, 1998 - ‘wand of a diviner’.

Joseph Smith wrote of his encounter .....snip..... He was given plates and two stones (plastic cases containing compact disks).
(Comment) Again, how could someone be so dense at to describe transparent plastic as stone?

American English is using the same ‘covered over’ Bible meanings as the Old English translations.
Joseph Smith’s understanding of ‘plates’ came from the stories of ancient Hebrew historian/ prophet Lehi/ Nephi. So we need to use the ancient Hebrew meanings – not contemporary American/English ones.

Hebrew word #6731 “plate” properly means ‘glistening as in a burnished plate’ and comes from word #6692 which means ‘to compress’.
Thus the original Hebrew meaning of plate stemmed from something compressed and glistening.

Again, a description of a compact disk.

RE: “Gold plates”, Book of Mormon.
Hebrew word #2091 “gold” comes from an unused root meaning ‘to shimmer’. The Old English translator has ignored the etymology of the word and decided it meant ‘gold’. But if we use the root meaning, “gold” originally associated with something that ‘shimmered’.

“Gold Plate” = a compressed, glistening, shimmering plate.

Ezekiel 2:9-10 says "Behold a roll of a book...written within and without&quot.
English meaning of "roll" is 'to rotate' (as in a rotary motion of an object around its own axis).
These are describing a compact disk that spins around (rolls) and has its information sealed within layers of plastic.
(Comments) Wow, what a stretch. Roll has a very specific meaning, it means to rotate around a horizontal axis in such a way as to move forwards in a horizontal direction perpendicular to said horizontal axis. Nobody who had actually seen a CD working would describe it as "rolling" and that isn't even the way it was described. It was described as "a roll of a book" which is how one would describe a large scroll.

Again, you are using contemporary English/American meanings, plus not the basic meaning of “roll” as I have cited from an Australian dictionary. Also see item 12 via www wordreference com/definition/roll .. which gives “roll” – ‘rotary motion of an object around its own axis’ and not the extended version as added in the comment above.

Let’s look at the etymology of the English word “roll”. In circa.1225CE it came to mean "rolled-up piece of parchment or paper", from O.Fr. rolle, from M.L. rotulus "a roll of paper", from L. rotula "small wheel", dim. of rota "wheel".
So back when the early religious Romans were translating the Hebrew Bible, their understanding of what we now call a “roll” was a ‘small wheel’. ie. an ancient description of a compact disk. The religious Romans later employed this ‘sacred small wheel’ as the concept (and exact shape) behind the wafer of the Roman Mass (the small wafer with the hole in the middle).

John reports seeing 12 lots of 12,000. John reported seeing the list of 12 items containing the 12:00:00:00 notation.
(Comment) Anyone else notice a missing 0 here?

While the 12,000 stated by John is one zero short of the 12:00:00 seen on the screen, elsewhere in his other work Ron Pegg explains that the biblical tithe which means 'a tenth' is an encoded value that in the historical context reduces actual non-religious historical numbers over one thousand that are quoted in the Bible by one tenth. ie. the last zero is left off the number stated in the Bible. In this case the twelve 120,000 numbers (12:00:00) are quoted as twelve lots of 12,000.

 

[wollery]

Well, you ignore the fact that the old testament wasn't written in Hebrew, but in Aramaic, then translated into Hebrew, then Latin, then English.

12 lots of 12,000 would be 144,000, not 120,000. Someone, somewhere in all this can't do basic maths.

And what of the other criticisms?

 

[BlackKat]

Extracts from member’s Qs & As (WBD website Study Area), used with permission.

>Why did they take back a 386 personal desktop computer ?

It was the minimum system that would run the four particular cd-roms.

At some time in the future, someone was going to notice that the images from a certain cd-rom that run on a certain computer match to the described imagery by nearly all the ancient prophets.

If a different type of computer was taken back to the past each time, then there would not be a consistent trail of clues documented in ancient texts that could be traced back (forward) to a particular computer system.
As Pegg was using the same type of computer and cd-roms that were documented in ancient texts, it was easy for him to identify the technology being described and the contents of the cd-roms.


>Where was the electricity source to power computers in the ancient world ?

It is surmized that if the technology was available to make and send a time machine, chrononauts, and a computer back in time, then it would be a relative simple matter to power an older style computer.

It was explained that Noah's Ark was a computer carry and storage box. The computer fitted into the smaller end, while the 200 x 50 x 30 cm end contains enough space for a series of batteries that would be able to power a computer.

A PC is a PC is a PC. The chassis is as interchangeable as your clothes. You could (cooling and motherboard standards issues aside) use any given chassis for any given processor. Or if you want to be really silly you don't need one at all:
http://www.wayodd.com/funny-pictures2/funny-pictures-the-ghetto-computer-19v.jpg
(looks like something ES would do)

Where is it explained that Noah's Ark is a computer? Noah's Ark (so the myth goes) was a boat holding a male and female of every species of animal ever to exist. As laughable as the flood/boat/animal myth is, it is less laughable than it being a computer.

I leave your linguistic spaghetti to someone better at it than me.

But I am fairly sure that part of the Joseph Smith myth is that he knew only English at the time of the Book of Mormon's writing... and that it is largely just plagiarized from the King James Bible (written in English of course). This is what Joseph Smith thought of when he says the word 'plate':
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_plates

And a headstone is just a tablet shaped stone like we see on many grave sites:
http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&q=headstone&btnG=Search+Images&gbv=2

CDs spin. A wheel rolls. A scroll 'roll's up.

 

[MRC_Hans]

Welcome Edy P

To the opening post: Nice piece. You need to flesh it up with an actual plot, of course, and some action. Go for about 150 pages, and you'll have a nice SF/fantasy novel, that based on your authoring skills and luck could actually be published. Then start thinking about a sequel. Why, if you're good you could have stuff there for a "Time Trilogy".

.....

.... We were not supposed to take this seriously, ehh?

Hans

 

[MRC_Hans]

*snip*
It was explained that Noah's Ark was a computer carry and storage box. The computer fitted into the smaller end, while the 200 x 50 x 30 cm end contains enough space for a series of batteries that would be able to power a computer.

Wrong ark. You are thinking of Mose's ark. Ark means box. Do try to get your references straight; good research is the cornerstone of good litterature. Only the wildly talented can get away with skipping on research, and I fear you are not one of those.

Hans

 

[Ladewig]

Extracts from member’s Qs & As (WBD website Study Area), used with permission.

>Why did they take back a 386 personal desktop computer ?

It was the minimum system that would run the four particular cd-roms.

At some time in the future, someone was going to notice that the images from a certain cd-rom that run on a certain computer match to the described imagery by nearly all the ancient prophets.

If a different type of computer was taken back to the past each time, then there would not be a consistent trail of clues documented in ancient texts that could be traced back (forward) to a particular computer system.
As Pegg was using the same type of computer and cd-roms that were documented in ancient texts, it was easy for him to identify the technology being described and the contents of the cd-roms.

I am amazed almost to the point of speechlessness. Your response answers the question of why the 'time police' brought a ridiculously large computer with a ridiculously small amount of the computing power. But you have not explained why the first teams of time travelers brought ridiculously large computers with a ridiculously small amounts of the computing power.

 

[Ladewig]

While the 12,000 stated by John is one zero short of the 12:00:00 seen on the screen, elsewhere in his other work Ron Pegg explains that the biblical tithe which means 'a tenth' is an encoded value that in the historical context reduces actual non-religious historical numbers over one thousand that are quoted in the Bible by one tenth. ie. the last zero is left off the number stated in the Bible. In this case the twelve 120,000 numbers (12:00:00) are quoted as twelve lots of 12,000.

Why would someone who had never seen colons in his entire life believe that 12:00:00:00 should be considered 120000 before multiplying by one-tenth?

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ETA - What you are doing is called shoehorning: coming up with far-fetched explanations of why the data supports your theory when it fact the data contradicts your theory.

 

[Loss Leader]

...It is the translation into English that has covered over the original meanings, ...
Hebrew word # 3871 “tables” comes from a root meaning of ‘to glisten’ with the given meaning ‘a tablet (as polished)’ of stone, wood, or metal – with Hebrew renderings of ‘board; plate; table’.
...
Hebrew word #4731 “staff” also means ‘rod’; and from the electronic CD-Rom version The Holy Bible, Media Graphics International, 1998 - ‘wand of a diviner’.
...
Hebrew word #6731 “plate” properly means ‘glistening as in a burnished plate’ and comes from word #6692 which means ‘to compress’.
Thus the original Hebrew meaning of plate stemmed from something compressed and glistening.
...
Hebrew word #2091 “gold” comes from an unused root meaning ‘to shimmer’. ...
Let’s look at the etymology of the English word “roll”. In circa.1225CE it came to mean "rolled-up piece of parchment or paper", from O.Fr. rolle, from M.L. rotulus "a roll of paper",
...
While the 12,000 stated by John is one zero short of the 12:00:00 seen on the screen, elsewhere in his other work Ron Pegg explains that the biblical tithe which means 'a tenth' is an encoded value that in the historical context reduces actual non-religious historical numbers over one thousand...

So everything in the Bible is true except when we get to the parts that really hurt your theory. At that point, we must depart from actually reading the text to examine root words, mistaken observations, mistranslations and more.

It all seems rather ... convenient.

 

[Neutiquam Erro]

I am amazed almost to the point of speechlessness. Your response answers the question of why the 'time police' brought a ridiculously large computer with a ridiculously small amount of the computing power. But you have not explained why the first teams of time travelers brought ridiculously large computers with a ridiculously small amounts of the computing power.

Because performance/compatibility problems have been encountered on other journeys?

 

[Ladewig]

How then do you think modern objects and their contents became documented and depicted in many of the world’s ancient texts - as the evidence shows ?

Would you cite some of this evidence?

I do hope you are not going to drag out the Mayan carving showing an astronaut. That, like all of von Daniken's claims, has already been debunked.

 

[ktesibios]

Of course, there's an alternate explanation for ancient CD-ROMS.

Minus Y2k: The Bug that Toppled Egypt

 

[Edy_P]

Replies

>”Well, you ignore the fact that the old testament wasn't written in Hebrew, but in Aramaic, then translated into Hebrew, then Latin, then English.”

You may not be aware of the format of Strong’s Concordance.

The full title of its ‘Lexicon’ to which I refer is “New Strong’s Concise Dictionary of the words in the Hebrew Bible with their renderings in the King James Version” and has two parts,
1). Hebrew and Aramaic Dictionary,
2). Greek Dictionary.

I obtained my original Old Testament meanings from the Hebrew and Aramaic section (abbreviated by me in my works as ‘Hebrew’).
I have in fact referenced the Aramaic and Hebrew origins of the Bible’s words.


>”12 lots of 12,000 would be 144,000, not 120,000.”

Nowhere have I said nor indicated that the 12 lots of figures had to be multiplied together.
The fact that 12:00:00 taken as a number derives 120,000 was indicated earlier.


>”A PC is a PC is a PC. The chassis is as interchangeable as your clothes.”

It was the monitor that had to fit into the small end of the carry box.
The bigger the chassis, often the bigger the monitor, so the smallest – 386 was employed.


>“ Noah's Ark (so the myth goes) was a boat”

Someone else pointed out that “ark” means ‘box’, not boat.

>“Where is it explained that Noah's Ark is a computer?”
In the Study Area of the WBD website, News Reports, EP’s 2005 DISCOVERIES section – Noah’s Ark Identified .


>“But I am fairly sure that part of the Joseph Smith myth is that he knew only English at the time of the Book of Mormon's writing”

My information about the “plates of Mormon” is taken from the Introduction Section of the Book of Mormon – specifically the “A Brief Explanation About” page.


>In relation to Noah’s Ark, Hans commented “Wrong ark. You are thinking of Mose's ark.”

Noah’s Ark is mentioned by Moses in the Old Testament – so technically it too is an ark of Moses. But this is not the point you are trying to make, as I believe you are referring to the ‘Ark of the Covenant’. Different box. Grab Strong’s Concordance and view the original meanings for yourself – “box of compacts”.


>“Why would someone who had never seen colons in his entire life believe that 12:00:00:00 should be considered 120000 before multiplying by one-tenth?”

Refer Revelations 7:4 “And I heard the number of them which were sealed: sealed an hundred forty four thousand of all the tribes of the children of Israel.”

John says he ‘heard’ the numbers. The messenger told him 144 thousand, then related the 12 lots of 12:00:00:00 notations as 12,000s.
It was the messenger that told John the numbers in the encoded format.


>“So everything in the Bible is true except…”

No. Most of the prophets and the so-called ‘witness’ letters (which have been deemed by religious people to be ‘true’) are describing viewing imagery from the cd-roms.


>“…we must depart from actually reading the text…”

You are reading American/English meanings of translated Latin words interpreted by contemporary evangelists (depending upon which Bible you are reading) who did so with their own agenda.

>“…to examine root words, mistaken observations, mistranslations and more”

The printed version of Strong’s Concordance is required, as many modern electronic versions and other types of Lexicons have been amended to make the modern contemporary meanings fit with the slant the various modern Religions wish to influence.

Take the word “ark”.
For five thousand years we have been told that ark meant a boat, but that is not what the original Hebrew/Aramaic meaning indicates.

When you check the original meanings, you will be surprised how many do not use the root meaning, but just the translator’s interpretation. So what we have been lead to believe- is not actually correct.


>I asked “ How then do you think modern objects and their contents became documented and depicted in many of the world’s ancient texts - as the evidence shows ?” and received the reply…

>”Would you cite some of this evidence?”

On the website I have shown comparisons of textual descriptions with the imagery from the Ancients cd-rom.
I can only assume that the website has not been visited, as the following is presented….

First up in the NEWS HEADLINES section...
Modern Objects Depicted in Ancient Texts
Ancient Encounters with Modern Objects
Ancient Tablet Identified as a modern CD-Rom
End-Time Book with Seven Seals Identified
Computer Parts Described in Ancient Texts
Imagery from CD-Roms Described in Ancient Texts
-Egyptian Hieroglyphs (Book of the Dead)
- Genesis Chapter 1 (Old Testament)
- Ezekiel's Wheels within Wheels
- Ezekiel's Temple Measured
- The Beasts of Daniel
- Four Beasts of Revelations (New Testament)
- Gospel of Matthew
- The Mountainous Ship (Qur'an)
- Hindu and Buddhist Understanding (India)
- Apparatus of Nostradamus Identified
Modern History Told and Shown to Ancient People
- 1991 Persian Gulf War
- 1994 Comet SL-9 impacting Jupiter
- Events portrayed as End Time Signs
Activities of Modern Scholars Told to Ancient People
The Big Picture

From the STUDY AREA....

Here is a list of Pegg's Reports
New Testament - John's Four Beasts
Old Testament - Daniel's Four Beasts, Ezekiel's - Wheels, - Four Beasts, Temple Measured
The Qur'an - The Mountainous Ship
The Book of Mormon - Lehi's Dream, The Plates of Mormon
Plato's Walled Temple, Atlantis Island Found, City beneath the Sea
Nostradamus WTC 911
ANCIENT TABLETS
Seer Stones
Hebrew
Hindu
Buddhist
Hebrew Oracle
Angelic Messengers
Heaven's Ladder
Writing on the Wall
Three Windows

Here is a list of my Reports
DISCOVERIES 2002 -
CD-rom in Bible
City at 45 Degrees
The Smith Encounter
Bible Code 2
Book with 7 Seals
Daniel Time Lines
Seven Kingdoms
Creation Myth Revealed

ANCIENTS CD-ROM
Review & Criticism

2005 DISCOVERIES
Noah's Ark Identified
Tabernacle Contents
Masters & Reincarnation
Reincarnation in the Bible
Brasen Serpent of Moses
Sepher Yetzirah
Akkadian Mythology
Book of the Dead
Egyptian Hieroglyphics
Egyptian Vignette

This was just the visual presentations.

Link: www worldbreakingdiscoveries com au ...

 

[Ladewig]

Why would someone who had never seen colons in his entire life believe that 12:00:00:00 should be considered 120000 before multiplying by one-tenth?

Refer Revelations 7:4 “And I heard the number of them which were sealed: sealed an hundred forty four thousand of all the tribes of the children of Israel.”

John says he ‘heard’ the numbers. The messenger told him 144 thousand, then related the 12 lots of 12:00:00:00 notations as 12,000s.
It was the messenger that told John the numbers in the encoded format.

1) Why would a time traveller demonstrating a computer to an ancient person read information from the boot screen!? Or more precisely, why would anyone preparing to show images from a CD_ROM (in this case "Ancient Civilizations of the Mediterranean") ever read numbers from the boot screen.

2) Why would that time traveller who was reading numbers from the boot screen say twelve-thousand (or one-hundred twenty thousand) when looking at a time notation indicating midnight? (citation: http://worldbreakingdiscoveries.com.au/2007h/nh_5.html )

. . . . . . . . .
You skipped what I now consider to be the most important question in the thread: What will you do if none of the predictions come true by 2013?

 

[Ladewig]

”Would you cite some of this evidence?”

On the website I have shown comparisons of textual descriptions with the imagery from the Ancients cd-rom.
I can only assume that the website has not been visited, as the following is presented….
[snip]
Ancient Encounters with Modern Objects

From the link :

The Egyptian Priest (and Hebrew prophet) Moses had an encounter with whom he believed to be God, on a mountain, in a bright light, and was given instructions and
two tables of stone, and utilized a miraculous staff.

In another Old Testament story Jacob had a dream upon stones in which he saw heaven's ladder (Genesis 28:11-19).

The Old Testament prophet Ezekiel saw the glory of God (a bright light) and cherubim (angelic messengers), then told of his encounter which included visions and the measuring of a certain temple, plus information about future events. He spoke of a certain 'roll of a book' that was written 'within and without'.

The Old Testament prophet Daniel in a dream saw certain visions, and speaking with angels (one was named Gabriel) was told of future events. He was shown a certain 'end time book'.

The Christian prophet Jesus had an experience with a white light (of the Holy Spirit), went up a mountain, was given instructions, and told stories.

The writer of over half of the Christian New Testament, Paul, saw scales fall from before his eyes (Acts 9:18).

Those stories are not evidence. Those are stories related by primative people to emphasize concepts important to their religion. To say that Jesus saw a bright light and was told stories does not indicate in any way that Jesus spoke with time travellers.

- Ezekiel's Wheels within Wheels link

How can anyone seriously take that claim as evidence that Ezekiel was visited by time travellers?


You are starting with a theory (time travellers from the future took antiquated computers back a few thousand years) and are focusing on data that supports your theory while ignoring logical gaps, errors in reasoning, and evidence against your theory.

 

[Cuddles]

To say that Jesus saw a bright light and was told stories does not indicate in any way that Jesus spoke with time travellers.

In fact, this proves that Jesus didn't see a computer. That would have been a blue screen, not a white light.

 

[NobbyNobbs]

I'm going to be very disappointed if this theory doesn't somehow involve a 1.21 gigawatt flux capacitor.

 

[Edy_P]

More Replies

>“1) Why would a time traveller demonstrating a computer to an ancient person read information from the boot screen!? Or more precisely, why would anyone preparing to show images from a CD_ROM (in this case "Ancient Civilizations of the Mediterranean") ever read numbers from the boot screen.”

The messenger cited by John, and reported by John as showing him things from the ‘sealed book’ and specifically telling him things – was teaching John how to run a cd-rom from the computer’s Window Manager screen.

>>“Why would a time traveller demonstrating a computer to an ancient person read information from the boot screen”

To show John exactly where and what had to be clicked upon* to make the presentations appear on screen.
John then ran another two cds and reported their contents: Grolier cd in Revelations chapter 9, and RedShift2 cd in Revelations chapter 12.

* ie. the number (in kb) of the seal (program file) that must be highlighted in order to be clicked upon.


>“2) Why would that time traveller who was reading numbers from the boot screen say twelve-thousand (or one-hundred twenty thousand) when looking at a time notation indicating midnight?”

This ties in with their previous encoding of historical information in the Old Testament. In the New Testament, in Rev chp 9 the total ‘troop number’ is also reported as a tenth less than actual historical figures. It was one of the ways they encoded info of troop numbers.
To John, this series of twelve numbers may have stood out as something special, so he asked what they were in relation to the main 144K number he was told. For some reason he interpreted them to refer to the children of Israel (tribes) – which is a reference to ‘troop numbers’ encoded in the Old Testament (hidden under the religious interpretation of ‘children of Israel’).


>“What will you do if none of the predictions come true by 2013?” was asked in relation to “21st December 2012: After sixteen years of research and investigation, the whole planet’s population has been informed and the ‘religion switch’ is turned off” where it was first asked “..what will you do if all this has not occurred by 2013?”

I have not made any predictions. In the accompanying NOTE it clearly stated “The Future section contains thoughts on how all this may have come about.” This also included the 21st December 2012 section too. Ronald Pegg mentioned this date as the possible ‘turn-off’ date of religions. I added his thoughts to my summary.

I personally will continue research based on any new information – and evaluate the new info as required. Whether that Mayan date is what Pegg suggests remains to be seen.


>“You are starting with a theory (time travellers from the future took antiquated computers back a few thousand years)…..”

No. Time travellers from the future taking computers back a few thousand years is the conclusion based upon ten years of investigation.

Between 1996 and 1998 Ronald Pegg found modern historical events documented in ancient texts, both at the surface level and in an encoded manner. That was his first observation.

When these claims were investigated – it was found that ancient texts do in fact contain extracts of actual history from specific modern history books. (named on the website)

Upon further investigation it was found that the common link between the documentation of future historical events in ancient texts was an encounter with God or his angels. These angels used certain ‘books’ to show and tell the ancient prophets who then documented their encounters.

At this stage it was proposed by Pegg that GOD’s Angels travelled through time and took the named printed modern history books back to the ancient prophets and told and showed them the enclosed information – as documented by various named ancient prophets. This was the first theory. The evidence seemed to support this concept.

But if this theory was correct for the Old Testament, then at other encounters with angels or gods, there should be the same evidence of modern history documented. But as well as history, there were certain sequences of animal imagery cited (the ‘future visions’).
In 1998 Pegg found that the described imagery from “dream or vision” encounters with messengers not only contained the printed history book data, but the exact sequence of images from the Ancients cd-rom. This expanded the search for evidence throughout the period 5000BCE to 1890CE to include the documented WAR data, ANIMAL pictures, plus other future Astronomical and Historical events including certain Named People (being the religious story of the ‘End Time SIGNS’).

Pegg used his hypothesis to predict what additional evidence should exist only if the hypothesis is true. Basically, at all encounters with gods, GOD, or Angels, various combinations of animal descriptions, Persian Gulf War data, named people and the historical events – should appear in ancient texts.

He investigated over 25 ancient texts, and there in the ancient descriptions – often covered over by mistranslations or religious rhetoric – were the same animal, war, and future historical events documented. And the documented “Visions” and “Signs” in all these ancient texts were found to be descriptions of sequences of imagery from at least three cd-roms – Ancients, Grolier, and RedShift2.

He found that some of the religiously described gods, GOD, and angels were not of a divine nature, but referred to the icons from the three cd-roms (the seals/doorways which were often depicted as animals).
This destroyed his first theory that it was GOD’s Angels who took back the modern books and compact disks.
The other ‘angels’ who are documented by the named prophet as specifically talking to and showing them ‘future things’ were therefore also not of a divine nature.
Pegg found computer parts documented in the Old Testament, and when Strong’s Concordance was employed to return the mistranslated and misinterpreted Latin and Greek meanings back to the original Hebrew/Aramaic, WHY all this is documented in ancient texts was eventually revealed.

In 2002 I set up PPHC Study Group to reinvestigate all his work. Most of it checked out (98%).
I then included Akkadian and Egyptian texts, and found computer technology documented in their stories and depicted in hieroglyphs.

So my announcement of ‘Modern computer technology is described and depicted in ancient texts’ is not a theory – but the fact that modern computer technology is described and depicted in ancient texts.

At this point, based upon ten years of investigation, I conclude that human time travellers made this happen. We know the WHY, we know What was used and sent back to the past – as it is documented in texts and depicted in others – but just like most people, I personally do not know How or When the technology for this becomes (became) available.


>“To say that Jesus saw a bright light and was told stories does not indicate in any way that Jesus spoke with time travellers. In fact, this proves that Jesus didn't see a computer. That would have been a blue screen, not a white light.”

The “white light” refers to the arrival of the time messengers – not Jesus looking as a computer screen.
It is one of the characteristics of time travel.
Refer “a tube of light up into the sky” as mentioned by the British researcher Jenny Randles in her book ‘Time Storms’ wherein she examined and established several distinctive attributes for the phenomenon that she called a Time Storm - a disturbance in the flow of time.

 

[wollery]

 

[BlackKat]

I just hope these time travelers have an "excellent adventure".

Where's the kitten Wollery?