You haven't the imagination to realise Knox did knife Mez in the neck, as did Sollecito tortured Mez with his numerous knife flicks and ripping off her bra. Keep frantically trying to think of 'alternative explanations' because you will never be given live CCTV footage of the incident.
Well, Bill Clinton appears to be your role model when he famously and consistently averred, ""I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky," Like yourself, he really seemed to believe that if he kept saying it then it somehow became true! Knox believes if she keeps saying, "I did not kill Meredith," it becomes a magic mantra that converts history into a new reality if enough people swallow the deception. Clinton also used to claim he never inhaled. Think hard as to whether sensible people believed his nonsense. Don't be like Trump or Clinton; just tell it like it is.
Hellman was laughed out of court by his contemporaries.
Your statement that they (Knox and Sollecito) were acquitted (of the murder/rape charges) on a "technicality" is ambiguous, because you have not defined what you mean by a "technicality". I suggest you consult a dictionary (for example, the Britannica) to find out the generally used meanings of the terms "technical" and "technicality". I further suggest you then consult a discussion of the term "legal technicality" in Wikipedia. The following quote is from the Wikipedia article (superscript citation numbers omitted; italic bolding added for emphasis).
It appears I do have to provide this again:
Now, if you'd like to present your credentials in Italian law and evidence the above Italian lawyer* who wrote it is wrong, please do so.
So Italian lawyer Mariano Acquaviva is either lying or stupid and you know Italian law better. Got it.
Nothing but a failed attempt to divert attention from the fact that you cannot provide a single example of your claimed Knox "even demonstrates Kercher's scream by placing her hands over her ears whenever she talks about it." Nor can you dispute that not a single court, including Massei and Nencini, found that Knox was referring to anywhere but Sollecito's apartment when she said "I was there. I can't lie about this".
LOL! I've never brought up Bill Clinton in regard to this case. I was referring to the usual PGP lie that Sec. of State Hillary Clinton somehow forced Italy to overturn Knox's 2011 acquittal. But, you know that. Bringing up Bill Clinton is just a silly and obvious red herring.
Hellmann had the last laugh when Marasca-Bruno pretty much upheld what he ruled and slapped Nencini red like a Napoli fishwife.
Vixen seems to think the prosecution failing to prove guilt BARD is a "technicality". Maybe Finnish law is different? Oh, wait...no, it's not:Your statement that they (Knox and Sollecito) were acquitted (of the murder/rape charges) on a "technicality" is ambiguous, because you have not defined what you mean by a "technicality". I suggest you consult a dictionary (for example, the Britannica) to find out the generally used meanings of the terms "technical" and "technicality". I further suggest you then consult a discussion of the term "legal technicality" in Wikipedia. The following quote is from the Wikipedia article (superscript citation numbers omitted; italic bolding added for emphasis).
In objective fact, Knox and Sollecito were acquitted on the merits; there was no reliable, credible evidence of their guilt. Thus, they could not lawfully be found guilty, because a guilty verdict in Italy by law must be supported by proof beyond a reasonable doubt (CPP Article 533). When there is no such proof, the accused must be acquitted according to Italian law (CPP Article 530).
Your reference to a quote by Albert Einstein was incomplete and thus somewhat a distortion. According to one source, he included curiosity as one of his traits. I suggest that the intelligent person, such as Einstein, couples imagination, knowledge of empirical reality, and curiosity. He would not have been able to formulate his revolutionary theories without a firm foundation in the known physical science of his time.
Sources:
Technicality Definition & Meaning | Britannica Dictionary
TECHNICALITY meaning: 1 : a small detail in a rule, law, etc., and especially one that forces an unwanted or unexpected result; 2 : something that is understood by experts but usually not by other people usually plural often + ofwww.britannica.com
Legal technicality - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
A quote by Albert Einstein
The true sign of intelligence is not knowledge but imagination. I have no special talent. I am only passionately curious.www.goodreads.com
Er, so how come you seem oblivious to Knox' DNA on the murder knife with MK's DNA on the blade, a knife Sollecito himself said she carried in her bag from his apartment, together with HIS DNA firmly implanted on the bra clasp, inner side of the hook.
A poster said I had imagination, unwittingly handing me a compliment and admitting envy of it. The technicality is that the whole thing was declared an acquittal owing to 'insufficient evidence' because Bruno - Marasca allowed themselves to be browbeaten by Bongiorno waving a lenghty paper written by third party academic Peter Gill, using notes from Conti-Vecchiotti, a weirdo friend of the guilty with a wet belief in USA innocent Project campaigners.Your statement that they (Knox and Sollecito) were acquitted (of the murder/rape charges) on a "technicality" is ambiguous, because you have not defined what you mean by a "technicality". I suggest you consult a dictionary (for example, the Britannica) to find out the generally used meanings of the terms "technical" and "technicality". I further suggest you then consult a discussion of the term "legal technicality" in Wikipedia. The following quote is from the Wikipedia article (superscript citation numbers omitted; italic bolding added for emphasis).
In objective fact, Knox and Sollecito were acquitted on the merits; there was no reliable, credible evidence of their guilt. Thus, they could not lawfully be found guilty, because a guilty verdict in Italy by law must be supported by proof beyond a reasonable doubt (CPP Article 533). When there is no such proof, the accused must be acquitted according to Italian law (CPP Article 530).
Your reference to a quote by Albert Einstein was incomplete and thus somewhat a distortion. According to one source, he included curiosity as one of his traits. I suggest that the intelligent person, such as Einstein, couples imagination, knowledge of empirical reality, and curiosity. He would not have been able to formulate his revolutionary theories without a firm foundation in the known physical science of his time.
Sources:
Technicality Definition & Meaning | Britannica Dictionary
TECHNICALITY meaning: 1 : a small detail in a rule, law, etc., and especially one that forces an unwanted or unexpected result; 2 : something that is understood by experts but usually not by other people usually plural often + of
Legal technicality - Wikipedia
A quote by Albert Einstein
The true sign of intelligence is not knowledge but imagination. I have no special talent. I am only passionately curious.www.goodreads.com
No, you continuously lie about the situation and you have been proven wrong time and again (as Stacyhs has done so again). You very, very rarely admit to the simplest of errors, so I have no expectation that you will admit you are wrong if in the face of Stacyhs' cite.
Read the court papers for yourself instead of soaking up propaganda.
We have, repeatedly, and again just recently. Fringe resets are yet another play from the guilter/CT/woo playbook. Also, what part of "I'm qualified to evaluate the work of the prosecution's 'experts', and you're not," was unclear?
Do you think that continually repeating these lies will somehow make them true? It's obvious from Vinci's CrimeScope photo that the first and second toe prints are touching, a fact which the prosecution's 'experts' failed to notice, presumably due to their only working with visible-light photographs of the bathmat, rather than the actual mat itself enhanced under infrared light. This caused them to mismeasure the width of the big toe and wrongly to assert that only four toe prints were visible. Because this is so obvious from the CrimeScope photo, you and other guilters are forced to lie and claim that Vinci was reprimanded/accused of using Photoshop, despite the fact that you have no evidence of this. So why did you lie about it?
There are at least two false statements in your post quoted above. The false statements are apparently the result (or associated with) exercises of imagination uncoupled from any knowledge of reality. It's your apparent lack of knowledge, together with your failure to investigate (perhaps due to a lack of curiosity or desire) the known facts in adequate detail, that leads to the absurd failures - that is, lack of correspondence to reality - of your imagined scenarios. Here are brief comments giving the realities:
Er, so how come you ignore the report that found MK's DNA on the blade was "scientifically unreliable" and that Knox's DNA on a knife she used to cook with is completely normal? Or do you think your DNA isn't highly likely to be on your own kitchen cutlery? Are you of the opinion that DNA is only left during the commission of a crime?
Quote and cite where he does so. If you can't, then I'll consign it to the assfact bin.
You mean the one the SC found to most likely by from contamination due to the sloppy work of the police and the fact it had the DNA of other men on it? How did that get there, Vixen? Did those other men touch that bra hook, too?
You're knowingly and dishonestly implying the DNA was left on the hook on Nov. 2. You conveniently (and dishonestly) ignore the 46 days before its collection wherein unrecorded multiple people went in and out of the bedroom with no record of what, if any, anti-contamination protocols were violated. Violations that are recorded on Dec. 18 by the police themselves. Go on, perform convoluted acrobatics as to how the clasp moved from its first photographed site next to Kercher's body several feet across the room in a pile of debris. Did it fly? Walk itself?
Yes, Guede who took Kercher's keys so he could get out the locked front door.
Why not use the key you insist they had?
Sigh. "All you have is your imagination and a keyboard," is not a compliment and claiming that I 'admitted envy of it' is yet more evidence of your imagination. I think 'delusions' might have been a more accurate word than 'imagination'.
Nope. You are falsely claiming that Art. 530, chapter 2 of the code of criminal procedure under which they were exonerated is a 'technicality'.
Some posts don't even deserve a reply. That's one of them.
Clearly you can't see the forest for the trees from where you are standing.
The "imagination" in guilter posts is somewhat similar to the "hallucinations" that can occur in artificial intelligence: a word salad with falsehoods.