Oh dear. You just don't understand the law, the facts of this case, and the truth of the matter, do you? And I suspect that, by this point, you never will. Just as a small, rapidly diminishing group of nutters will insist until their dying day that the US Government brought down the Twin Towers (and that they have the evidence to "prove" it), or some other nutters in a similar sad small group will insist until their dying day that the Moon landings were faked on a Hollywood sound stage (and that they have the evidence to "prove" it).
Fortunately, your abject inability to analyse this case properly - on either a judicial or evidence basis - is utterly immaterial. Knox and Sollecito are correctly acquitted and absolved, Guede correctly stands guilty of an assault/murder that he carried out all by himself. Mignini is correct discredited. Italian criminal justice is correctly discredited. The guilter nutters are correctly discredited. All good.
Stop trying to derail this into a discussion of well-known conspiracy groups re 9/1 and the Moon landing. This has absolutely nothing to do with them.
If anyone has a conspiracy theory, it is the PIP who have a zealous faith-based belief that it is not possible for Knox to have killed anyone, being as she is a nice American, just like themselves or their own daughter. We have to look for a vagrant whose life is worthless, instead.
The fact is, anyone who has read the court documents and followed the case from Day One of the murder, as I have knows the truth of the matter beyond reasonable doubt. Yes, criminal trial courts are not 100% given the secretive nature of serious crime but it is the best mechanism we have for ascertaining the facts of what happened leading up to the crime, its duration, the aftermath and the perpetrator/s if apprehended. The latter have the fullest opportunity of defending themselves at every step of the way, with the clear advantage of knowing they have a 3:1 chance of being acquitted as juries lean in their favour. The more serious the crime, the more loath jouries are to find a verdict of guilty, especially if it involves a Death Penalty. There should be no room for sentimental pity and romanticism. Mitigation and militation should come after the verdict and only be taken into account during sentencing. Justice should be equal for everyman, not just ones that people have sentimental feelings towards.
So arguing with someone who comes from a zealot's position is a futile one because zealotry is based on a faith-based blind belief and thus your viewpoint is the Conspiracy Theory one, which revolves around a belief that Mignini was the puppeteer who managed to control all of the cops, the judges and the courts. That he had some evil plot to 'get the American girl' which involved 'coercively interrogating her boyfriend' to force him into nailing her (as if he himself was innocent and only gallantly standing by her). It also involves bewitching the hugely talented Massei and stickler for protocol Nencini. All are under his spell is your Conspiracy Theory.
This all started from Conspiracy theorist Doug Preston who as a novellist thought he could solve the Monster of Florence crime and ended up being kicked out of Italy by Prosecutor Mignini for trying to interfere with justice. So Preston, with a massive grudge against Mignini, has been smearing him and trashing Mignini at every possible opportunity, including launching Friends of Amanda Knox and trying to make out 'Mignini hates Americans and is trying to frame her!'
It is your choice, you can believe in a ridiculous fantasy or you can own up to the cold truth of the matter.
Real life criminal cases are dull and boring. They are carefully managed and scheduled. They do not involve people bursting through the court room door at the last minute, Perry Mason-style, shouting, 'Stop the court! I have new evidence re the pillow that will change evverything!!!'
Live in the real world and ditch Fox News and People magazine.
