• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The Trials of Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito: Part 29

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Machine is preparing an article about this very topic so I am not going to queer his pitch.
That'll explain why he's (Harry Rag) gone a bit quiet on YouTube, which is his favourite haunt. He's got me vexed with one of his more recent comments though:

"If Meredith was your daughter, you would have a completely different opinion about Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito's numerous lies. You wouldn't be able to hand wave them away."

Hmmm! I don't know what he's trying to tell me but he's previously denied being a relative of Meredith.

Hoots
 
<fx: head in hands sand>

Maundy Gregory knows the position of Anthony's loci. They're in the public domain. He doesn't need to have "(studied) Casey Anthony's genes".

Your lottery "analogy" is anything but an appropriate analogy. You don't understand DNA science properly.

And once again (how is this failing to get through to you??), it's not that Anthony's and Knox's DNA profiles are "matching" in any way. It's that among the mountain range of small peaks on the output chart of the bra clasp hook, it's possible to find "peaks" which match Anthony's DNA profile, just as it's possible to find "peaks" which match Knox's profile. They're not the same peaks for both people though, Vixen.

<fx: head buried even deeper in sand>

FIFY
 

Attachments

  • lojo.jpg
    lojo.jpg
    151.1 KB · Views: 3
most impressive

But you don't understand, Chris! Vecchiotti was 'bent'. She was paid off by the mafia or Masons or was prostituting herself in order to get her name out there. As were all defense experts and acquitting judges.
That two million went further than I thought.
 
Last edited:
You do know that even a defence expert geneticist Vinci, found Knox' DNA, together with Guede's on Mez' bra fabric re sample 165B?

Objective neutral scientific results puts Knox at the crime scene with Guede.

Not quite. Despite your refusal to do more than finally present the Vinci report (in Italian and not searchable or translatable by Chrome or c & p) I typed the relevant parts into a translation program. Unsurprisingly, your claim was false. Vinci found some DNA that was compatible with Knox just as it would be compatible with other people.
But it is his conclusion regarding that DNA that puts the lie to your claim:


Ultimately, given the extreme interpretative complexity of the trace in question which is made up of a single mixture of different DNA, where in addition to a major component (that of the victim) there are other male and female minor components (in turn present in different concentrations), therefore an unequivocal interpretation is impossible or at least extremely random; therefore it is to be considered that this trace is not absolutely usable for evidentiary purposes.


In other words, Vixen, Vinci did NOT find Knox's DNA on the bra clasp. Will you now stop claiming he did?

I wonder of The Machine will bother to include Vinci's conclusion in his hit job...er...'article'.
 
Last edited:
I read it somewhere but can't seem to find it ATM.

Surprising since you said it was readily available on the internet.

ATM? You made that claim in early Sept. It's now November.

Just admit you haven't got any evidence. But will you stop proclaiming it as a fact?
 
This thread has got too long so is running slowly; please visit the new edition here.
Posted By: Agatha
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom