• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The Quantum Cosmology Inverse Theory

fuelair said:
A lot and I could name names were there not rules whose numbers I know not stayed my hand's typing fingers!!!
Click to expand...

I think we can talk smack about people who aren't forum members. And there are a number of cranks who were banned from here (not for being cranks, but for behaving badly). So I think they may be fair game. I'll take a chance.

Anyone remember Michael Mozina? Good times, good times.
 
Excellent ideas! I hope the OP will allow us to help refine and extend the theory by expressing it in more conventional language. This exploration and fleshing out will aid both the OP's communication and help us understand the ideas better.

For example, in the abstract, is says this: As we zoom into the sub-atomic levels and beyond we begin to approach the Inverse, a realm where space and time does not exist, and more importantly where the laws of nature or physics do not apply.

I am wondering how, if space and time do not exist, we can retain the idea of "large" and "small." Those, at least to me, seem to depend on notions of space and time.
 
Ziggurat said:
I think we can talk smack about people who aren't forum members. And there are a number of cranks who were banned from here (not for being cranks, but for behaving badly). So I think they may be fair game. I'll take a chance.

Anyone remember Michael Mozina? Good times, good times.
Click to expand...

For myself, I'll always miss Yale Landsburg (YaleL) and his "coming towards and going away from". Or was it "going towards and coming away from"? :confused:

Crossbow... you recall?
 
Ziggurat said:
I think we can talk smack about people who aren't forum members. And there are a number of cranks who were banned from here (not for being cranks, but for behaving badly). So I think they may be fair game. I'll take a chance.

Anyone remember Michael Mozina? Good times, good times.[/QUOTEYou are quite correct!! But, unfortunately there are still a reasonable number here.
Click to expand...
 
It's got quantum in it, so it must be true.

(incidentally, I'm going to use that as the title of my next novel...)
 
I respect the OP's proper use of formatting, font consistency and reasonable use of bolding and capitalization.

They can still be saved.
 
abaddon said:
Yet somehow will not respond. This is a discussion forum. If you will not discuss your ideas then by definition, there is no discussion to be had.
Click to expand...

That's a standard crackpot MO- you proclaim your version of "the truth," but never, ever actually engage in any discussion of it in detail on its own merits. The preening over how hard a truth it is to handle is an armoring of it against any analysis more meaningful than its mere presentation- you don't need to engage in discussion of an idea you've already exalted in your own mind to heights too difficult for lesser minds (i.e., pretty much everybody else) to scale. You get to toss your head and sniff "peasants!"; really, that was its only purpose to begin with.

Priests don't respond; they don't need to. (Channeling Anthony Hopkins from Nixon here a little...)
 
jaysadie said:
Thanks for all the feedback. Appreciate your candor. :)
Click to expand...

If you liked my candor, you are gonna love my condor:

picture.php


He's Amish, and doubtful about your theory.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom