The Puerto Rico Thread

Puerto Rico is required by law to pay back it's loans and bonds even before paying for government operations. So, no, your optimism is sadly misplaced.

I was trying to get a glass half full.


Come to think of it, some people in Puerto Rico would also be happy with a glass half full.

And today, Trump was talking about how we can't stay there forever. I guess electricity and drinking water isn't a big deal.
 
Last edited:
It's too good to be true. :mad:

The "vulture" funds will get their money paid in full, the people of Puerto Rico will continue to suffer substandard infrastructure and to be treated as third or fourth class citizens.

If the GOP stay in control for the next decade, I wouldn't be too shocked to find some kind of jiggery-pokery going on whereby people from Puerto Rico (and other US territories) ARE US citizens but they have rather fewer rights to live and work elsewhere in the US than citizens of the "proper" US Real Americans.
FTFY
 
Members of Congress want a federal audit of the official Puerto Rico death toll

Two Democratic members of Congress on Thursday requested an audit of the death toll in Puerto Rico following Hurricane Maria, amid concerns that the government is undercounting the number of victims.

The request cites a Vox report published Wednesday that found a significant discrepancy between the government’s official death toll of 45 and reports from the ground. Our analysis found a total of 81 deaths linked directly or indirectly to the hurricane; another 450 reported deaths, most of causes still unknown; and reports of at least 69 people still missing.

...

Velazquez and Thompson went on to ask the Department of Homeland Security to do the following:
  • Conduct a federal examination of all death estimates provided by local authorities.
  • Evaluate the accuracy of such estimates and whether or not their methodology is appropriate.
  • Send a report of these findings to Congress within 10 days.
 
Christ things are desperate there.

Jose Luis Rodriguez waited in line Friday to fill plastic jugs in the back of his pickup truck with water for drinking, doing the dishes and bathing.

But there is something about this water Rodriguez didn't know: It was being pumped to him by water authorities from a federally designated hazardous-waste site, CNN learned after reviewing Superfund documents and interviewing federal and local officials.

Rodriguez, 66, is so desperate for water that this news didn't startle him.

"I don't have a choice," he said. "This is the only option I have."
 
The "vulture" funds will get their money paid in full

It is not the fault of the lenders that Puerto Rico decided to borrow more than it could comfortably pay.

the people of Puerto Rico will continue to suffer substandard infrastructure

That tends to happen when you elect incompetent and corrupt government. That isn't the GOP's fault.

If the GOP stay in control for the next decade, I wouldn't be too shocked to find some kind of jiggery-pokery going on whereby people from Puerto Rico (and other US territories) ARE US citizens but they have rather fewer rights to live and work elsewhere in the US than citizens of the "proper" US.

:rolleyes:
 
It is not the fault of the lenders that Puerto Rico decided to borrow more than it could comfortably pay.

Nor is it the fault of the people who currently don't have clean water.


Well, to be fair, it is a democracy, so there is a certain level of blame that belongs to the citizens, but that's kind of a long term issue, as opposed to a rather more short term problem which is that 40% of the people still don't have access to a drinking water supply that we in the 21st century would consider a minimum level for civilization.

I just can't see how anyone can look at the outcome in Puerto Rico and give the US government a passing grade on the response.
 
It is not the fault of the lenders that Puerto Rico decided to borrow more than it could comfortably pay.

That tends to happen when you elect incompetent and corrupt government. That isn't the GOP's fault.

:rolleyes:
Let's blame those brown people, everyone knows they have corrupt politicians. Heck, surely some of them managed to shift PR's wealth into their own pockets. Or maybe they went wild spending on unnecessary infrastructure... oh wait, can't be that. Should we look for crony capitalism like the way Bush paid his cronies to rebuild Iraq?

Just where is all that borrowed wasted money?


Puerto Rico's crisis: How did it get so bad?

Yes, there was some government overspending but why was that? Was everyone getting tax breaks?

2. The U.S. Congress changed the lawSo what happened 10 years ago? Congress is partly to blame for the mess. The island used to be a tax haven for some big businesses such as the pharmaceutical industry. It was cheaper to make drugs on the island than anywhere else in America because companies didn't have to pay federal tax on the Puerto Rican operations. But in the mid-1990s, Congress began rolling back the special tax exemptions for businesses operating in Puerto Rico. The tax breaks phased out and fully ended in 2006.
Puerto Rico's economy tanked after this happened, and it has yet to recover. Many good private sector jobs were lost and tax revenues dropped. The economy has shrunk almost every year since.

On top of that, the Merchant Marine Act of 1920 mandates that only U.S. vessels can take goods between Puerto Rico and the U.S. mainland. This increases prices on the island and makes goods produced in Puerto Rico less competitive than those coming from cheaper Caribbean nations that send goods on their own ships.
PR has no Senators, no Congresspersons. Sounds like a convenient place to target legislation without affecting one's voter base.


Then there was this, after PR was allowed to issue bonds, then Congress tanked PR's economic base, Congress also did this:
4. Congress stripped Puerto Rico of its bankruptcy rightsAnother major drawback for Puerto Rico is that it doesn't have access to the same bankruptcy laws that states do. So-called Chapter 9 bankruptcy was created after the Great Depression to allow cities, towns and other municipalities to address severe debt problems under a workout process overseen by the courts. Detroit is the most famous Chapter 9 bankruptcy case so far.

Puerto Rico used to have Chapter 9 bankruptcy rights, but the island lost them in the 1980s when Congress revisited this part of the bankruptcy code. The Obama administration and the governor of Puerto Rico argue that it was an unfair decision and that Congress should give the island Chapter 9 rights again. So far, the Republican-controlled Congress is largely against it.
We can bail out Wall St, but those brown people, they're lazy and corrupt, it's clearly their own fault.

Here's a more recent article that adds a bit more to the picture.

So let's see. The Congress votes in tax breaks for pharmaceutical companies operating in PR. Then they vote those out about the same time as the 2008 economic collapse brought on by the financial companies getting greedy and over-extended. (Wait what? Overextended debt.... )

Prior to that:
Puerto Rico has been able to borrow money without a lot of raised eyebrows thanks to -- once again -- a US tax break. Unlike US states, Congress lets Puerto Rico issue debt that’s tax free. This made the island’s debt really attractive to investors, who lent their money for way longer than they might have otherwise....

Puerto Rico’s debt is mostly in the hands of private investors (think: hedge funds, mutual funds, individuals), who are now caught holding the $74 billion bag. And unlike Greece, whose economic issues put the whole eurozone at risk, the US economy doesn’t have a huge overall stake in Puerto Rico’s problems.
Nice for Trump, he can kick the PR dog and not many in the mainland will be affected. Plus, it's just brown people, everyone knows they're lazy and corrupt.

:rolleyes:
 
I absolutely refuse to believe we would be having this discussion if an actual proper state in the US, even Hawaii so no one can play "But it's an island!" card, was almost fully and completely without basic utilities almost a month after a hurricane.
 
Let's blame those brown people, everyone knows they have corrupt politicians.

Race has nothing to do with it. White people are perfectly capable of electing corrupt and incompetent governments as well. And yes, Puerto Rico's government is corrupt and incompetent. You may object to me saying that all you want to, but it will remain true. And despite all the other excuses you make, this will also remain the heart of the problem.

Should we look for crony capitalism like the way Bush paid his cronies to rebuild Iraq?

Tu quoque much?

Just where is all that borrowed wasted money?

That's a good question. But you should be asking that of the people who borrowed it. *I* certainly didn't spend any of it.

Yes, there was some government overspending but why was that? Was everyone getting tax breaks?

Well, yes. Residents of Puerto Rico don't have to pay federal income tax. That's a pretty damned big tax break.

But that doesn't deprive Puerto Rico's government of any funds.

As for the change in the law, I find it amusing that you're upset that Congress STOPPED giving big pharma a special tax break unavailable elsewhere. It's almost like incentives matter, and lower taxes can stimulate an economy. Who would have thunk?
 
Residents of Puerto Rico don't have to pay federal income tax. That's a pretty damned big tax break.

But they paid over 3.75 billion yearly into the US Treasury in other taxes including but not limited to import/export taxes, Federal commodity taxes, and federal payroll taxes. They also pay into Social Security and Medicare, but that's outside the scope of this discussion.

The United States is not a membership club the Puerto Rico hasn't been paying it's "dues" to.

And remember they have zero representation on a Federal Government level. No electoral votes for President, no voting presence in Congress. And as an entity the US has generally had a problem with "Taxation without Representation." I remember that being a thing once.
 
Oh and on topic is "You get more from the government than you receive" really something you want to bring into the conversation? Because I've got news from you most of the actual states, just to function normally without a disaster, take in a lot more in assistance from the Federal government than they pay into it. Only about 15 or so (the exact number varies depending on exact definitions) of the 50 states give more to the Federal government than they get back.

So if a hurricane flattens Mississippi (which gets 40% more from the Federal Government in a normal, non-emergency year than it pays into it in taxes) people would holding that over their head?
 
Last edited:
Well, yes. Residents of Puerto Rico don't have to pay federal income tax. That's a pretty damned big tax break.

Not for 47% of the people.1
But I must agree with Joe Bentley, and I'll go farther. In the 21st century, the notion of a United States "territory" should be non-existent. US citizens should have full rights and responsibilities of US citizens, instead of living in some sort of gray quasi-citizen area. Territories should either be made into states, incorporated into an existing state, or be made independent.

1 Romney, Mitt. 2012.
 
<snip>


Well, yes. Residents of Puerto Rico don't have to pay federal income tax. That's a pretty damned big tax break.

<snip>


Offset by the income taxes they pay to Puerto Rico. And they still pay all the other payroll taxes collected by the Feds.

I have read that it is likely they would be paying less if they were paying Federal income tax instead.
 
But I must agree with Joe Bentley, and I'll go farther. In the 21st century, the notion of a United States "territory" should be non-existent. US citizens should have full rights and responsibilities of US citizens, instead of living in some sort of gray quasi-citizen area. Territories should either be made into states, incorporated into an existing state, or be made independent.

I agree this whole situation is waaaay past it's "What's the point again?" date.

Over 3 and a half million Americans live in Puerto Rico. That's more than live in 21 of the States.

Almost 700,000 live in the District of Columbia which is more than live in Wyoming or Vermont and it has the 19th highest Federal Tax rate despite not having a representative in Congress (at least not one with any power) which just strikes me as all kinds of not right.

We shouldn't have over 4 million Americans living in some sort of stateless limbo land.

Puerto Rico is certainly large and organized enough to be it's own state. It Hawaii can function as a state in the middle of the vast Pacific ocean so far away from anything it might as well be on the moon I think we can handle a larger, more populated island much closer.

The District of Columbia is a little weirder. I get the logic behind it, not putting the seat of the Federal Government in a state so the state can't overly influence the Federal Government and it made since back two hundred years ago when D.C. was in the middle of a vast nothing and the our system was more skewed to state and away from Federal power than it is now.

But now I don't see Maryland or Virginia being able to strong arm the Federal Government if the citizens of D.C are just treated as citizens of one of them.

The rest of the inhabited islands; Guam, the Northern Marianas, American Samoa, and the Virgin Islands... maybe not pure statehood but lump them all together politically into a "American Outlaying Island" group and give them a couple of Senators a few Representatives to share between them at least.

Maybe because this is because I, despite my small "L" libertarian leanings just don't have a hard on for states having all that much political power anymore.
 
The United States is not a membership club the Puerto Rico hasn't been paying it's "dues" to.

That's not the point. I'm not arguing that Puerto Rico isn't paying its fair share. I'm pointing out that the tax burden on Puerto Rico isn't what's holding them down.
 

Well that's what the UK tends to do when citizens in overseas territories look like emigrating to the home country en-masse following a political upheaval or natural disaster.

If it looks like a couple of million Puerto Ricans are suddenly going to pitch up in the lower 48 then I can easily envisage a reassessment of Puerto Ricans' status
 
Whatever the reason for Puerto Rico's debt (and the link below indicates that disparity in federal funding is a factor in addition to those already mentioned), here the US is, nearly a month after a hurricane hit the island and a significant proportion of the population is without power and water.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puert...bt_crisis#Disparity_in_federal_social_funding

The Trump Administration is awarding itself an A+ for its performance. I suggest that if the situation were reversed and a Democratic President, Senate and House were in charge that the GOP wouldn't be giving them a similar grade.

Sadly Puerto Rico has slipped out of the international news, I don't know what extent it continues to be reported on in the US, which means that free from the glare of publicity the failures will be ignored and the Puerto Ricans will continue to suffer.

I cannot see a similarly large group of US citizens being ignored in a similar way if they were a state.
 
We have millions of Americans without basic utilities. Maybe fighting over which "side" gets how many points added or taken off their score can wait for a while?
 

Back
Top Bottom