• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The Origin of Oumuamua

I keep seeing vids from Astrum pop up and they always trigger my suspicion that they're a junk sci channel. Is this not the case?
I think it's an above average astronomy focused channel. In my opinion he does pretty thorough research on the topic of each video. The only question is, how interested are you in the topic. I actually did end up finishing watching that video and I think I learned some more about it.
I've never bought Avi Loeb's theory that it is an alien technological artifact. To me, the Bayesian probabilities weigh heavily in favor of some sort of natural object like an asteroid. I think there are a lot more asteroids and comets in space than there are technological artifacts made by intelligent species, whether terrestrial or extra-terrestrial. Therefore, any new object spotted by a telescope that hasn't been cataloged before is much more likely to be a natural object based on the relative populations of those objects in outer space. The slight anomalies observed here don't amount to sufficient evidence to conclude otherwise.
 
I keep seeing vids from Astrum pop up and they always trigger my suspicion that they're a junk sci channel.
Which of these videos "triggered" you?

 
That is in the orbit. But what about its composition? Like what elements and minerals are they made from?
Lead and helium fall at the same rate when only gravity is considered.

Did you watch the video? That might help. Also, consider asking ChatGPT or similar to refine your questions.
 
Lead and helium fall at the same rate when only gravity is considered.

Did you watch the video? That might help. Also, consider asking ChatGPT or similar to refine your questions.
What video are you talking about? This one?

But that one is a picture, not a video. Or are you talking about the one from Astrum? I am not going to watch a 31 minute video whose quality has been questioned.
 
I am not going to watch a 31 minute video whose quality has been questioned.
Questioned for no reason and without evidence.

You can increase the playback speed. Or you can just ask your questions to google if watching a video with all the info packaged in is too demanding.
 
Questioned for no reason and without evidence.

You can increase the playback speed. Or you can just ask your questions to google if watching a video with all the info packaged in is too demanding.
Actually I did watch Astrum's video after I made the post. It was obvious junk. Discussed if it was a light sail. What rubbish. Just like your post. It did not address my post.
 
Astrum does look like algorithm junk. Most video titles are essentially just "You won't believe ...", which is ironically why I never clicked on one.
 
That is in the orbit. But what about its composition? Like what elements and minerals are they made from?
Actually I did watch Astrum's video after I made the post. It was obvious junk. Discussed if it was a light sail. What rubbish. Just like your post. It did not address my post.
I don't think anyone knows what elements and minerals Omuamua was made of. We only had a very faint glimpse of it through telescopes. We know that at least one side of it seems to be more reflective than the others. This could because it is oddly shaped. The discussion of whether it might be a light sail was in the context of discussing a hypothesis proposed by Avi Loeb, a Harvard Professor. I agree that this hypothesis is almost certainly rubbish, but I don't think that means we shouldn't discuss it. I think it's worth considering, even just as a thought exercise.
 
The most interesting part of the video to me was not about Oumuamua itself. If it appears to be accelerating somehow... is there anything else like that we've seen? They ask this at about 13:30


They found 6 objects in the solar system that have acceleration that can't be explained by gravity or solar wind. This one kind of looks like it just turns in another direction:
1747140577830.png
 
They found 6 objects in the solar system that have acceleration that can't be explained by gravity or solar wind. This one kind of looks like it just turns in another direction:
View attachment 60792
Here is the Wikipedia page on that object:


It is possible that it's something like an old rocket booster according to the article, although there are other possibilities mentioned in the Wikipedia article.
As far as the weird shape of its orbit, that diagram is centered on Earth, not the sun, with the yellow object being the moon, and the earth itself is orbiting the sun. The apparent bend in direction is probably just because it is leaving earth's gravity well.


330px-Earth-moon-gravitational-potential.svg.png
 
New interstellar object sighting:

Astronomers on Wednesday confirmed the discovery of an interstellar object racing through our Solar System – only the third ever spotted, though scientists suspect many more may slip past unnoticed.

The visitor from the stars, designated 3I/Atlas by the International Astronomical Union's Minor Planet Center, is likely the largest yet detected. It has been classified as a comet.
Later on in the article there is this:

Our third visitor​

This marks only the third time humanity has detected an object entering the Solar System from the stars.


The first, 'Oumuamua, was discovered in 2017. It was so strange that at least one prominent scientist became convinced it was an alien vessel – though this has since been dismissed by further research.
 

Back
Top Bottom