since skeptic.com, the website of Michael Shermer, now has a forumwhich has an educational section, I'll be taking all future details of my progress on this to there.
I do not see any active support by JREF that specifically aims to consider young people - students especially - either in their forum structure or even in their advertising.
I don't see any forum that has child-friendly structures in place, such as recognising the need for anonymity for young people. I don't see in promotional material for any of the popular skeptical sites like JREF, skepchicks or skeptic.com a concerned effort to bring in the thoughts of young people on skepticism. No books aimed specifically at encouraging reading for young people that weren't prompted by myself on two of those forum boards in a similarly-worded post - only skeptic.com has a links for further reading for young people. Athon prompted the sticky on this board, but it has remained static here.

i have outlined the same suggestion in a PM about a section for education on two of the non-JREF forums I mentioned and only skeptic.com was amendable to seeing the value of encouraging more on that line. Political gesture or no - this goal of mine and some others seems to be unimportant on JREF and it should be better supported
So - I'm going to change to skeptic.com to write more. It will take a while, i know and I always had the dream of writing a book of collected essays and lesson plans, by many people focusing on just the educational experience of skepticism and critical thinking. Maybe, as I suspeced long ago, I'm not the best person to be heading this, but I don't see anyone else prompting that idea of publication openly as a real goal. I know of many who probably have thought similiar - but I think action beyond forum posts are long overdue. No,. not a dig. It;s something that deserves more focus beyond mere forum members and we have to do it ourselves if the 'big names' are more focused on other concerns.
But I'll start by taking this outline of action research that I've done in this thread to another forum that I believe shows more of a consideration for the rights of young people, simply in not implementing a rule that denies them their right to safety - by not asking for a 'real name'.
See it as 'taking my ball and leaving;, if you want. I'll still be more than willing to share any and all of my research with any teacher, as i don't think that presenting educational findings is the propertyor even 'hero worship' of one person is acceptable. We are all able to contribute, even in a small way, to the education of young people. And should do so.
Students are not so easily reached by commentaries, blog entries and forum boards that are not young-people focused, I find. But their teachers may want content beyond just skepti musings and debunking. practical application should be a goal and I haven't seen that - just look at the sticky on the top of this forum where many voiced and worked towards outlining, and how it stalled.

Yes, it;s probably because there are so few teachers with somany other demands, mysef included in that.
But if it really meant anything to people outside of the teaching profession, why haven't they done anything themselves to highlight it? I'm tired of being in the wilderness, myself, seeing what prgress can and is being done - being overlooked in favour of adult-content aimed promotion of skepticism. The practical is lost amongst the debunking.
Call me cynical, maybe. But I'm done here.
