• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The Infinite! In Search of The Ultimate Truth.

Thor 2 said:
Interesting.

- Your clock gains time and yet the interacting forces slow down the clock. :confused:

- You have to get the service guys to adjust the clock? Most of us can do this stuff ourselves.

Can't believe I am wasting my time reading this crap.
Click to expand...

I usually adjust the aforementioned dashboard clock around Daylight Saving Time change. On a couple of occasions the service person took it upon herself/himself to do it. Perhaps it is a general issue that they had been looking on. As far as clock gaining due to interacting forces, despite of clocks usually loosing time; I think you missed the part where I wrote that it was perhaps "a failed attempt by manufacturer to compensate" for loss in time keeping, as time went by.

The point I was trying to make is that watches and clocks are not a reliable telltale sign that time exists, they are simply human made tools to measure the Sunrise-Sunset-Sunrise period, WE humans have established. As with EVERYTHING within the Infinite, clocks and watches too are affected by gravity. If you doubt this statement, stick your watch/clock out of the window and let go; see if it floats (you can try the same ecperiment in your bathtub, filled with water).

By the way, body inversion is good for circulation as well! I could provide links for all its aforementioned benefits, but as of yet I have not completed the 15 posts required in order to be able to post any links on this site.
 
Last edited:
Apathia said:
Cause the Ultimate Truth has many more 0s and 1s than this: 00110100 00110010, and it would be incorrect to break the expression up.:wackygrin:
Click to expand...
101010 is the Ultimate Truth correctly put in binary. It's quite neat looking too as a binary number.
 
I can envision tazan in a hand made silk suit and tv preacher plastic hair in front of a huge neon 42 . An elaborate stage setting and him shouting random stuff about The Infinite as a crowd of confused folks ponders just what the hell he might be talking about, and why the neon 42.

Many apologies to Douglas Adams for linking his work to this mess.
 
tazanastazio said:
I usually adjust the aforementioned dashboard clock around Daylight Saving Time change. On a couple of occasions the service person took it upon herself/himself to do it. Perhaps it is a general issue that they had been looking on. As far as clock gaining due to interacting forces, despite of clocks usually loosing time; I think you missed the part where I wrote that it was perhaps "a failed attempt by manufacturer to compensate" for loss in time keeping, as time went by.

The point I was trying to make is that watches and clocks are not a reliable telltale sign that time exists, they are simply human made tools to measure the Sunrise-Sunset-Sunrise period, WE humans have established. As with EVERYTHING within the Infinite, clocks and watches too are affected by gravity. If you doubt this statement, stick your watch/clock out of the window and let go; see if it floats (you can try the same ecperiment in your bathtub, filled with water).

By the way, body inversion is good for circulation as well! I could provide links for all its aforementioned benefits, but as of yet I have not completed the 15 posts required in order to be able to post any links on this site.
Click to expand...


Should I do the watch/clock out the window or in the bathtub simultaneously with the body inversion therapy? The gravity will boost the blood pressure to my brain but drain my feet and Christ knows how it will effect my chakras. Must get Scorpion's take on this one.

Just keep posting the same thing twice and you will get to the 15 mark in no time. :)
 
Thor 2 said:
Just keep posting the same thing twice and you will get to the 15 mark in no time. :)
Click to expand...

That was a mistake; there is no delete button, the post was the last one on the page but was appearing also on the top of the next one when initially tried to edit (cell phone, tiny letters; enhancing does not work well). I could still only edit the one that was edited last, but that was on the preceding page. So I left them both.

What is your theory on the appearance of Hawking's singularity? Why wouldn't my theory suffice better as opposed to "I don't know"?
 
Last edited:
tazanastazio said:
That was a mistake; there is no delete button, the post was the last one on the page but was appearing also on the top of the next one when initially tried to edit (cell phone, tiny letters; enhancing does not work well). I could still only edit the one that was edited last, but that was on the preceding page. So I left them both.

What is your theory on the appearance of Hawking's singularity? Why wouldn't my theory suffice better as opposed to "I don't know"?
Click to expand...


I do not have a theory on this and have difficulty staying up with Hawking's deliberations. Your "theory" just seems to be a lot of "what about this" and "suppose that" without building a case to support your utterances.
 
tazanastazio said:
That was a mistake; there is no delete button, the post was the last one on the page but was appearing also on the top of the next one when initially tried to edit (cell phone, tiny letters; enhancing does not work well). I could still only edit the one that was edited last, but that was on the preceding page. So I left them both.
Click to expand...
That is a feature, not a bug. Nobody can delete what they have posted, nor can the edit post hoc (beyond a brief period). It keeps people honest since they cannot remove or change what is already written. What is written stays writ. No revisionism allowed.

tazanastazio said:
What is your theory on the appearance of Hawking's singularity?
Click to expand...
Why do I need one?

tazanastazio said:
Why wouldn't my theory suffice better as opposed to "I don't know"?
Click to expand...
Because you do not have a "theory", you have a speculation. In science, theory has a very precise meaning. That meaning is not "idle speculation".
 
tazanastazio said:
That was a mistake; there is no delete button, the post was the last one on the page but was appearing also on the top of the next one when initially tried to edit (cell phone, tiny letters; enhancing does not work well). I could still only edit the one that was edited last, but that was on the preceding page. So I left them both.

What is your theory on the appearance of Hawking's singularity? Why wouldn't my theory suffice better as opposed to "I don't know"?
Click to expand...

What's so bad about "I don't know"?
 
Craig4 said:
But it is the Ultimate Question.
Click to expand...

Who am I to judge ? I took it as someone who had not had the pleasure of reading the Hitchhiker's guide.

I screw up math all the time. So no big deal, especially in this thread.
 
The last paragraph of the post (7th paragraph of the whole article) is corrected as follows:

[ There are infinite such universes forming and deforming within the Infinite; by either their comprising parts attracting and being attracted by parts of other universes, due to their gravitational forces surpassing the force of the Big Bang occurence; or by the outcome of the Big Bang occurence reversing, due to the gravitational forces of the various parts of the Universe surpassing the force of the Big Bang, before the point during which they would in turn be surpassed by the gravitational forces of the .parts of other Universes. Such reversal would continue till the parts of the Universe reach the point of tolerance during the so called Big Crunch. At some point during the Big Crunch, when the compacting forces surpass the point of compacting tolerance, a singularity is formed which leads in turn to a new Big Bang occurence. By parts of the Universe I mean stars, galaxies and clusters of galaxies.]
 
Here the 6th and 7th paragraph together for clarity:

[ If we were to make a distinction between the Universe and the Infinite, and we were to call "the Universe" the outcome of the Big Bang occurrence and the expansion that was caused by it, then; the actual (not the visible) universe may or may not have a center, and it may be of any shape; depending on the opposing forces of the fabric within the Infinite, which fabric in my opinion is comprised of, as far as we can measure, infinite minute particles. The border of the Universe, would then be the border between the force of the Big Bang occurrence (for a better word than explosion), and the force of the fabric within the Infinite, which would withstand the force of the Big Bang occurrence.

There are infinite such universes forming and deforming within the Infinite; by either their comprising parts attracting and being attracted by parts of other universes, due to their gravitational forces surpassing the force of the Big Bang occurence; or by the outcome of the Big Bang occurence reversing, due to the gravitational forces of the various parts of the Universe surpassing the force of the Big Bang, before the point during which they would in turn be surpassed by the gravitational forces of the parts of other Universes. Such reversal would continue till the parts of the Universe reach the point of tolerance during the so called Big Crunch. At some point during the Big Crunch, when the compacting forces surpass the point of compacting tolerance, a singularity is formed which leads in turn to a new Big Bang occurence. By parts of the Universe I mean stars, galaxies and clusters of galaxies. ]
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom