The Doc vs Pdoherty - Debate Underway

...p'doh doesn't actually know how to structure a debate, does he?

I was expecting at least something SEMIcohesive, but rather than advancing an argument after his opening remarks, he chooses to attack The Doc's opening statement.

Does he know what the opening statements are FOR???
 
Huh? What's his point? If indeed the fire department had decided to demolish the building as a safety measure, or to aid the rescue effort, what would be the point of denying it?

Or will he get to that?

Rolfe.
 
8den said:
Oi! The Doc may be Maverick, but comparing P'Doh to a Mig? It was a decent fighter,

One of these guys would be an accurate representation of P'Doh

[qimg]http://www.gmsr.co.uk/Great%20Milk%20Stout%20Ride%202005%20022.jpg%20team%20photo.jpg[/qimg]

Good luck, Doc, Chooks AWAY!
Click to expand...

Hey! How'd you get ahold of the Pilots for Truth member composite?
 
Rolfe said:
... what would be the point of denying it?

Or will he get to that?

Rolfe.
Click to expand...



He's never really explained that, and I don't expect him to. And I'd be surprised if anyone else expects it, either.

These guys just really don't get how other people think. If they had demoed WTC7 in order to assist the rescue operations, no normal person would ever complain about that. In fact, we'd probably honour them for making a good call in a tough situation. For regular people, buildings are less important than people.

Look at how people feel about the guys on flight 93 - they made a hard choice, that they knew would most likely end with the crash of the plane, but they did it, because that result was better than what was expected if they didn't make the choice. It sucks, but we all know why they did it, and we agree with their choices.

And P'Doh just doesn't quite get it. He'd rather believe in his paranoid fantasy world where everyone covers up everything, even if it doesn't have to be covered up.
 
Big Les said:
(The "MiG-28s" in Top Gun were Northrop T-38 Talon training jets (and possibly F-5As as well). God I'm tragic).
Click to expand...

Actually, I think they used the F-5's more than the T-38's.

F-5 as a MIG here...

MiG-28_screenshot%20802.jpg


T-38 here...

9500478.jpg
 
I think Pdoh is the only twoofer who thinks WTC7 was brought down by controlled demolitions for humanitarian reasons.
Click to expand...


He doesn't really think that, he's just figured out that people might be more open to the idea if it doesn't implicate the firefighters in murder or insurance fraud. Swing Dangler has tried the same approach.
 
Wrong. The official story claims it was fire.

Completely false. Fire is the official reason for collapse.
Click to expand...

How can PDoh simultaneously argue that the "official story" is a pack of lies and yet at the same time use the official story as the basis for his "refutation" of Doc?

Or at least, how can he do it without his head exploding?
 
This thread is creepy, because my husband's real name is P Doherty but his nickname is The Doc.

:scared:
 
tkingdoll said:
This thread is creepy, because my husband's real name is P Doherty but his nickname is The Doc.

:scared:
Click to expand...

Does he hear voices?

Does he argue with the voices?

Does he argue with the voices, then register those voices as separate accounts on JREF and transcribe the arguments?

DOES HE????????
 
I do not think for a moment that PDoh believes they took down WTC7 for humanitarian reasons. He is using this angle as it is harder to attack from an ad hominem perspective, and lends itself to more reasonability. Deep down I suspect he thinks they brought it down for the same reasons all the other truthers believe, he just sees this angle as a niche for him.

TAM:)
 
T.A.M. said:
I do not think for a moment that PDoh believes they took down WTC7 for humanitarian reasons. He is using this angle as it is harder to attack from an ad hominem perspective, and lends itself to more reasonability. Deep down I suspect he thinks they brought it down for the same reasons all the other truthers believe, he just sees this angle as a niche for him.

TAM:)
Click to expand...
Additionally, this approach is an attempt at a wedge issue.
 
Mashuna said:
Does he hear voices?

Does he argue with the voices?

Does he argue with the voices, then register those voices as separate accounts on JREF and transcribe the arguments?

DOES HE????????
Click to expand...

I'm sure there's a sizable difference between Tkingdoll's husband and Pdoh...

I'll just leave it at that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom