• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Testing for explosives

There wouldn't be much point looking for explosives in WTC 1 and 2, because Dutch demolition expert Danny Jowenko has said, in a video interview, that they weren't brought down with explosives.

He said WTC7 WAS a standard controlled demolition, so that's where to look. Try examining the insides of Larry Silverstein's jacket pockets to see if there's any residue left after he pushed the red button.

If anyone does investigate this crime properly, they ought to find out why the government and its agents decided to collapse the East part of building 7 first, and where they got the silent explosives from.

Oh wait, Steven Jones knows what explosives were used - silent nanothermite paint. It's all been verified in a peer-reviewed journal, and the perps are soon going to be on their way to jail, thanks to the efforts of Dr. Jones, Harrit and their merry band of investigators.

What a happy ending awaits.
 
LOL, I am starting to see a pattern here ;)
Squidgy,

Actually, I was just yanking your chain last night as I was in that kind of mood, and I apologize for being rude. Sorry about that.

Cheers,
Lash

[/OT]
 
When explosives are used, prior to the collapse, there are a series of charges going off, with characteristic loud bangs and flashes.

When the WTC's collapsed that did not happen.
With the WTC's, the conspiracy theorists claim that 'squibs' are shooting out, while the towers are collapsing.
This is a very big difference.
 

Back
Top Bottom