• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Input Requested Terms and conditions for the International Skeptics Forum

Darat said:
That's covered in the mod agreement and that won't be being changed beyond the changing of "JREF". See: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=27572
Click to expand...

The mod agreement should be in a public space then and linked to in the T&C. You're asking people to agree to special privileges for Mods and Admins without letting then know what a Mod or Admin can or can't do.

I know it's always been this way, but you did ask for feedback.
 
rjh01 said:
Will moderators be able to see our personal information? I thought only admins could do so currently? And who are the "officers of TribeTech or its agents" who can see this information?
Click to expand...


No, Mods have no access to names and such, only Admins do. This is a bit of standard/default language carried over from the existing JREF T&Cs, which was (presumably) put in place 'just in case'. You (and every other member) have, of course, the option not to agree to the new T&Cs if you take issue with them in any regard.
 
rjh01 said:
And who are the "officers of TribeTech or its agents" who can see this information?
Click to expand...

I don't know about officers, but agents usually refers to people that (in this case) TribeTech assigns certain tasks or responsibilities to. So an offsite backup provider would have a copy of the data sitting on their servers. Technical administrators would have console level root access to the operating system. Sometimes the companies providing the hardware have a certain level of access for remote hand and eyes if stuff goes wonky and remote access isn't working (though I don't think that's the case here). The server provider might have access to the physical disks (likely in the kind of setup we're going to) so in theory has access to the server disk and any snapshots taken. That kind of thing.
 
Last edited:
All posts are the opinions of their authors and are not the views or opinions of TribeTech.
Click to expand...

"All posts are the opinions of their authors and are not necessarily the views or opinions of TribeTech or its agents."

By posting, uploading, or sharing your content on the Forum, you grant TribeTech a perpetual, non-exclusive, sub-licensable, royalty-free, transferable, worldwide license to access, use, and display your content, which includes without limitation the right for TribeTech or any third party it designates, to publish, copy, excerpt, transmit, use, host, index, cache, distribute, display, create derivative works of, modify and adapt, in any form or media now known or subsequently developed.
Click to expand...

I realize this in intended to cover a lot of trouble spots, including possible baton-passing were that to become necessary, but as a whole, this copyright paragraph is a bit off-putting.

Copyright on content generated prior to TribeTech’s hosting of the Forum remains with the member, and such content has been republished on the Forum by the James Randi Educational Foundation pursuant to its license.
Click to expand...

"Copyright on the Forum content generated prior to TribeTech’s hosting of the Forum remains with the member, and such content has been republished on the Forum by the James Randi Educational Foundation pursuant to its license."

When your computer connects to the Forum, a record is kept of your IP Address .
Click to expand...

"When your computer connects to the Forum, a record is kept made of your IP Address." --You are making no promise to keep the records.


I didn't see an agreement term that explicitly permitted TribeTech to transfer the entire agreement and all of its rights under it to a third party. Wouldn't that resolve the passing-of-the-baton problem without the ungodly copyright condition?
 
arthwollipot said:
One question only:



Why the state of New York?
Click to expand...



Because that's where the lawyer who looked at this was licensed. His thought process was, "Well, I know this is all okay in New York. I have no idea how any of it might be interpreted outside of New York. If we ever get sued, I want to be able to handle the matter without hiring local counsel. Also, this same wording has been in every contract I've ever seen and I might as well put it in because I'm not about to be the one who screws this up."

As a lawyer in New York, I'm pretty sure that was exactly what happened.
 
LashL said:
No, Mods have no access to names and such, only Admins do. This is a bit of standard/default language carried over from the existing JREF T&Cs, which was (presumably) put in place 'just in case'. You (and every other member) have, of course, the option not to agree to the new T&Cs if you take issue with them in any regard.
Click to expand...

Mods do not have access to the database, so cannot look up details at will. However, names do occasionally get disclosed in the moderation area for operational reasons.
 
zooterkin said:
Mods do not have access to the database, so cannot look up details at will. However, names do occasionally get disclosed in the moderation area for operational reasons.
Click to expand...


... primarily related to sockpuppetry allegations.
 
I clicked on the linkk and nothing happened. I heard the letters pdf in the web address so I wanted to see whether my computer will turn it into something that Synthetic Dave can read, but as nothing happened I don't know!
 
Loss Leader said:
Because that's where the lawyer who looked at this was licensed. His thought process was, "Well, I know this is all okay in New York. I have no idea how any of it might be interpreted outside of New York. If we ever get sued, I want to be able to handle the matter without hiring local counsel. Also, this same wording has been in every contract I've ever seen and I might as well put it in because I'm not about to be the one who screws this up."

As a lawyer in New York, I'm pretty sure that was exactly what happened.
Click to expand...
Sure, but I would also like confirmation of LashL's answer from Darat or icerat if possible.
 
I ain't a lawyer, so I have to go on trust. Not very scepticky of me, I know. Please don't feed me to the machine!
 
IANAL, so I have no idea what I'm signing off on, but I agree. :D

PS. Can we make sure all members, including SusanB-M1 (see four posts above) and others, can access this info as well?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom