GreNME
Philosopher
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2007
- Messages
- 8,276
eta: and to reiterate, right now there's people in their doctor's office with a sniffle demanding antibiotics because they're worried about H5N1. And more than likely their doctors will oblige them. And the drug-resistant strains which evolve from this irresponsible use of antibiotics will kill far more people than H5N1 ever will.
Far more than this strain of H1N1, you mean. But with those two corrections, along with the difference that I would also add the overuse of 'antibacterial' cleaners, particularly hand cleaners instead of plain-old soap-n-water, I generally agree with you as far as the overall danger of this flu outbreak.
The danger in this flu outbreak-- what is making it a pandemic-- is that it's exotic enough that there is not much general resistance to it and people tend to get hit pretty hard and fast when such strains pop up. Combined with the absolute horrid healthcare for people with not-a-lot of money-- and I guarantee you that nearly everyone who dies from this is going to be lower-middle- or working-class-- this means that the fast spread of an exotic virus requires a strong reaction from health control organizations to prevent it from actually becoming dangerous. It's not very dangerous right now, though there are the same risks any bad flu virus has, but if the spreading of this disease is not managed efficiently it has the potential to become dangerous at some point, mostly due to complications and not the influenza itself.
So, yeah, there's cause for concern. But panic? The use of 'deadly' in reference to it? Completely over-the-top.
The virus has been confirmed in 11 states. Over the past week, CNN has been inundated with questions about the flu, technically known as 2009 H1N1. Senior Medical Correspondent Elizabeth Cohen tells you what you need to know.