Mr Manifesto said:
I 'advocated' no such thing. If a treatment exists, by all means use your money to get it. Just don't tell me about it.
Either you are avoiding the argument I made or it passed over your head. Either way, it's not flattering to you...
Reeve, of course, wasn't trying to get some magic treatment that wasn't available in the US. He was 'raising awareness' about being a quadraplegic. And he had zero to add to the discourse, unless you count 'being a quadraplegic sucks even if you're a celebrity!' a meaningful issue.
I made a simple analogy for your benefit. Apparentely it had to be simpler...
Let's try it again:
If somebody as a problem, he can do whatever he damn pleases to (legally) solve it.
To claim (or to defend, or agree with or whatever you prefer to call it) that a movie star shouldn't use their celebrity - their greatest asset - to find a solution for their problem is moronic. Specially if your argument boils down to the "why didn't they raise awareness before it struck them?" idiocy.
I don't think you should idolize stars, but to demonize them is equally moronic.
That's funny. He's done nothing to advance medical science.
People can advance anything in different, yet complementary ways.
In this case he did help advance medical science, by raising awareness of the problem, the irrational political agenda on embryonic stem cell research , and the need for funding.
He started a foundation that directly funds research.
The fact that you don't acknowledge even that shows you to be either an ignorant or a... let's settle for ignorant...
Is his death more tragic than that of any other? No it's not.
Was it a loss for medical science and stem cell research? Definetly.