Nosi
Illuminator
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2009
- Messages
- 3,164
Wow. I had no idea! So I take it the argument is not that porn is immoral because it is sexual, but because it leads to exploitation of women?
What the
Wow. I had no idea! So I take it the argument is not that porn is immoral because it is sexual, but because it leads to exploitation of women?
Gotta love when governments mandate personal behavior and call it liberation.
But pornography DOES exploit women; surely the dreary life of most porn stars is evidence of that?
I could approach your question in a few different ways:
1. Porn goes way beyond mainstream. There are people who willingly make porn and distribute it on the Internet for free. This doesn't exploit women in any conceivable way.
2. Even if most mainstream porn stars led a dreary life (do they?), I wouldn't be convinced that they were exploited. Unless you think that, say, McDonald's exploits its employees. Porn is a job like any other. Many people don't actually enjoy what they do for a living, but they do it anyway.
3. If you could actually convince me that porn is exploitation, why would it be exploitation of women?
I'm all for regulations against the exploitation of employees. I'd be willing to grant that the porn industry might not always be a healthy environment, emotionally speaking. But the problem isn't having sex in front of a camera. The problem would be coercing actors and actresses to do more than they are comfortable with, etc. But that's not inherent to the porn industry, nor to porn itself.
I only feel a woman is being abused if the sexual nature of their activity is done for free.
It's illegal to produce pornography in Iceland, so this legislation more or less closes a loophole that allows strip clubs to operate.
In a wellfare state, there is a big incentive for the government to discourage working as a stripper, namely that you can't really build a lifelong career out of it and will probably end up as a drain on the social security system once you get too old to strip.
Here in Atlanta Ga nude bars allow women to strip completely nude. many of these young attractive women are working their way through college or trade school. I'm sure many of the stripper women were doing the same thing in Iceland. Why deny these ladies this income? I only feel a woman is being abused if the sexual nature of their activity is done for free.
Is he any relation of the famous radio engineer, Vincent Dipole?Does this affect all of the non-profit strippers? You know like, St Vincent De Pole?
Does this affect all of the non-profit strippers? You know like, St Vincent De Pole?
It's illegal to produce pornography in Iceland, so this legislation more or less closes a loophole that allows strip clubs to operate.
In a wellfare state, there is a big incentive for the government to discourage working as a stripper, namely that you can't really build a lifelong career out of it and will probably end up as a drain on the social security system once you get too old to strip.
I would also question the propriety of outlawing a legitimate profession simply because it may be a drag on the welfare state later on.
Just who's the boss over there, the government or the people?
It is an insidious lefitst culture. They likely swingWhat do people...watch in the middle of the night when they want to add spice to the...usual?
are commercials with naked ladys also banned?
As said before, you don't have to work through college unless you want a higher standard of living than your peers. Also, never underestimate the social stigma of being "a stripper" in a pretty small town (Reykjavik got like 120k people or somesuch). Most in the nordic countries are pretty open about having sex, but not so much about making money from it.Here in Atlanta Ga nude bars allow women to strip completely nude. many of these young attractive women are working their way through college or trade school. I'm sure many of the stripper women were doing the same thing in Iceland. Why deny these ladies this income? I only feel a woman is being abused if the sexual nature of their activity is done for free.
No, I don't. All I have is anecdotal evidence from people I've met as a musician, but they might not be representative of strippers as a whole.Do you have any evidence that they are less successful than they might have been long term if they didn't strip? How many people become strippers instead of getting some other kind of career, and how many do it instead of just one more job?
The govenment have the right to ban practices which they find harmful. I don't personally see a problem with having animals fight for entertainment (I don't care much for animal wellfare), but I still understand why it's banned.I would also question the propriety of outlawing a legitimate profession simply because it may be a drag on the welfare state later on.
Just who's the boss over there, the government or the people?
No, I don't. All I have is anecdotal evidence from people I've met as a musician, but they might not be representative of strippers as a whole.
So that to ever have a life worth a damn they’ll have to depend on these psychopathic @#$%s who call themselves feminists.Why deny these ladies this income?