TruthSeeker
Illuminator
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2003
- Messages
- 3,587
I've Googled unsuccessfully, and I'm hoping someone here will know the answer to this:
I'm wondering about planned comparisons in a mixed model. Details:
2 (between subjects: sick versus healthy) X 4 (within subjects: assessment time: T0, T1, T2, T3) design.
N=13 sick and 22 healthy.
They run a mixed model ANOVA and find a significant within subjects main effect (F(3,99)=20.4; p <.001). No other main effects or interactions.
Then, they use LSD test for planned comparions of T0-T3. The stat for these comparisons is a t with 34 degrees of freedom suggesting that they are treating the two assessment times as independent, but these are actually repeated measures.
So, my questions are:
Is this an appropriate way to do a planned comparison of repeated measures?
If not, what might I recommend instead?
Thanks!
I'm wondering about planned comparisons in a mixed model. Details:
2 (between subjects: sick versus healthy) X 4 (within subjects: assessment time: T0, T1, T2, T3) design.
N=13 sick and 22 healthy.
They run a mixed model ANOVA and find a significant within subjects main effect (F(3,99)=20.4; p <.001). No other main effects or interactions.
Then, they use LSD test for planned comparions of T0-T3. The stat for these comparisons is a t with 34 degrees of freedom suggesting that they are treating the two assessment times as independent, but these are actually repeated measures.
So, my questions are:
Is this an appropriate way to do a planned comparison of repeated measures?
If not, what might I recommend instead?
Thanks!