• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Squib Timing

I simply don't believe this. You are exposing your dishonesty. Apart from the fact that it has been explained to you, above, are you claiming that a building can collapse without the air in it being compressed?

Hans

*sigh*

Let me explain. Again!! Right before the WTC towers were nuked to pulverized dust by the Star Wars beam of obliterating destruction, a giant ACME vacuum cleaner (hidden in the tower's basement) was switched on and sucked all the air out of the towers. The air thus gathered was collected in a giant balloon, hidden in WTC 7. Next to this balloon was a crossbow. Later that tragic day, Larry Silverstein gave the order to pull the trigger on the crossbow. This released an arrow that penetrated the balloon, which subsequently bursted, thus blowing up WTC 7.

Jeez, how often do I have to explain all of this?
 
Myself, I like to enjoy the refreshing feeling of menthol when I use my "Squibb" for shaving. A coincidence? I think not.

Cheers,
SLOB
 
Last edited:
Squid are impressively intelligent animals, all things considered (probably the most intelligent non-mammals in the sea).

If anyone could pull off a CD of the WTC in plain view of millions of people, it'd be squids.

-Gumboot
 
*sigh*

Let me explain. Again!! Right before the WTC towers were nuked to pulverized dust by the Star Wars beam of obliterating destruction, a giant ACME vacuum cleaner (hidden in the tower's basement) was switched on and sucked all the air out of the towers. The air thus gathered was collected in a giant balloon, hidden in WTC 7. Next to this balloon was a crossbow. Later that tragic day, Larry Silverstein gave the order to pull the trigger on the crossbow. This released an arrow that penetrated the balloon, which subsequently bursted, thus blowing up WTC 7.

Jeez, how often do I have to explain all of this?
But, but, but, has anybody figured out the effect of the pressure differential? I think that alone would be sufficient to make the towers collapse...

Heureka! I have it now:

The vacuum took some time to build up, this is the reason for the delay between the planes hitting and the buildings collapsing. Since the buildings were sucked down, this explains the faster than free fall collapse. Seems they understimated the size of the dustbag, this is the reason dust ended up all over the place.

Finally, the vacuum-cleaner was situated in WTC7, drawing air through underground ducts, this is the reason they had to "pull it", to hide the evidence.

Frankly, I think this theory is more logically coherent and defendable than most of the other CTs around.

Hans
 
But, but, but, has anybody figured out the effect of the pressure differential? I think that alone would be sufficient to make the towers collapse...

Heureka! I have it now:

The vacuum took some time to build up, this is the reason for the delay between the planes hitting and the buildings collapsing. Since the buildings were sucked down, this explains the faster than free fall collapse. Seems they understimated the size of the dustbag, this is the reason dust ended up all over the place.

Finally, the vacuum-cleaner was situated in WTC7, drawing air through underground ducts, this is the reason they had to "pull it", to hide the evidence.

Frankly, I think this theory is more logically coherent and defendable than most of the other CTs around.

Hans

A truther arguing with Anti-Sophist on the ColbertNation board:

You are a written contradiction.

Still holding on to your "faster than free fall" idiotic gibberish? Stop embarassing yourself.
How bout you let it go because I dont agree with you and just answer some other questions.

You told me that they fell at free fall speeds. So I said I dont agree with you and I feel they fell faster than free fall speeds because I believe an internal demolition caused a vacuum to suck the building into itself.

You say what kinda explosives can do that? I say I dunno because Im not a demo man or a pyro technition. Either are you...


I wont admit anything I dont believe so you can confidently tell me Im wrong and you can even tell me the world is flat but I wont believe you.

I do like your writing style because it has balls, but seriously man, I do not believe in your theory.
http://www.colboard.com/viewtopic.php?t=11295&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=54
emphasis mine
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom