• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Some Disaster Statistics

Of course. Bush was responsible for the local and state governments poor preparations and response, and the failure of numerous administrations and local corruption to address the known problems with the levies. And it was all due to him being on vacation too.

That is quite true!

It just goes to show that when the people who have the job of working and managing a major crisis or problem, then the public will not be too terribly critical of them when they make the inevitable errors and mistakes that occur during such situations provided that those involved actually show up to work and try their best. As was the case with Hurricane Floyd.

However, it also shows that if the people who have the job of working and managing a major crisis or problem are absent or shirking their duties, then the public will be quite critical of them when they make the inevitable errors and mistakes that occur from such inattention. As was the case with Hurricane Katrina.
 
Oddly enough, the media somehow neglected to get all up in arms concerning FEMA's failure to act in a timely manner during Hurricane Floyd and splash sensationalistic headlines all over the place. Very strange, that.

However, if you do a search on "hurricane floyd fema" you will find the occassional complaints related to some of FEMA's bungling of Floyd.

According to this, Clinton ordered evacuations too early, then the hurricane changed its trajectory and hit elsewhere. The issue becomes more about post-disaster aid handouts in the areas actually struck by the storm than anything else. That's a completely different scenario than Katrina, and a completely different kind of pre- and post-disaster bungling.
 
Can we get back to the question in the OP? Where's the money going? Has there been any accounting?
 
Forgive me for being cynical, but that money is probably going to paint the profile of a giant salmon on a bridge to nowhere, Alaska. Accounting? Government bureaucracy is there to make sure that, even if you were allowed to access the information, you couldn't be able to figure out where the money went...
 
Well how about this?

After being filled with political cronies and turned into a joke by the first Bush administration FEMA was remade into a professional capable organization under the LEADERSHIP of Clinton. Fast forward to 2001 and the party starts all over again, and in go the cronies.

Could that be part of the reason?

?

Daredelvis

Oh no, that could never be. For Bush said it was so, and Bush is an honorable man and so are they all, all honorable men.

(apologies to W.S., and it hurt me to write that lie, but..........)
 
Last edited:
Can we get back to the question in the OP? Where's the money going? Has there been any accounting?

Since you are too lazy to do your own research and I am too lazy to do mine, can you tell me where the $310 billion we have spent on the mess in Iraq has gone?
 
Since you are too lazy to do your own research and I am too lazy to do mine, can you tell me where the $310 billion we have spent on the mess in Iraq has gone?
Look, if you don't know, you can just say so instead of trying to derail the topic. Or is the bash-Bush reflex so ingrained in you that you are helpless to resist?
 
Since you are too lazy to do your own research and I am too lazy to do mine, can you tell me where the $310 billion we have spent on the mess in Iraq has gone?

You could start a thread and see if anyone knows a place to find that information insteading of derailing this one. Or are you too lazy for that too?
 
Can we get back to the question in the OP? Where's the money going? Has there been any accounting?
Start here.

In reviewing contracts awarded in another contingency situation, rebuilding Iraq, GAO found that without effective acquisition planning, management processes, and sufficient numbers of capable people, poor acquisition outcomes resulted...

Over $87 billion of federal funding has been appropriated in response to the recent hurricanes. In responding to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, the government depended heavily on contractors to deliver ice, water, and food supplies; patch rooftops; and provide housing to displaced residents and temporary facilities to local government agencies. Overall, the circumstances caused by the hurricanes created a difficult environment in which agencies had to balance the need to deliver goods and services quickly with the need for appropriate controls. Although achieving that balance is sometimes hard to accomplish, that fact must not be allowed to serve as an excuse for poor contracting practices...

FEMA tasked GSA to write three contracts in Louisiana for base camps, hotel rooms, and ambulances, with a total value of over $120 million. GSA contracting officers awarded the contracts, but could not tell us which FEMA officials would be responsible for overseeing contractor performance. The FEMA official identified as the main point of contact by GSA did not have any knowledge of these contracts or who was responsible for oversight...

The lack of overlap between oversight personnel for a large temporary housing contract left the most recent contract administrator with no knowledge or documentation of who had authorized the contractor to perform certain activities or why the activities were being performed....

GSA officials indicated there may also be other alternatives for ensuring adequate contract oversight, such as designating GSA employees to conduct oversight on some contracts...
Poor acquisition outcomes?

I don't think the GAO understands modern entrepreneurial capitalism.
 

Back
Top Bottom