• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Skunkrider: WTC7: Freefall

Arkan_Wolfshade

Philosopher
Joined
Jan 18, 2006
Messages
7,154
stop evading and explain the physical proof that wtc 7 collapsed partly in free fall speed

Skunkrider,

Please provide a clear definition by what you mean by the phrase, "collapsed partly in free fall speed" and provide substantiating evidence to support your definition and conclusions.
 
619745a54bbe44f13.gif
 
"free fall speed"

Free fall isn't a speed. It's a rate of acceleration.

That's why I never understood why the Enterprise went anywhere at 1/4 impulse speed. If you turn on your engines in space, you don't go a "speed," you accelerate at a fixed rate.
 
Well, skunkrider either does not agree with the previous discussions or feels that (s)he has information that renders them null. I'm giving him/her a chance to defend the statement made in another thread. :D
 
Okay, this is why I hate myself.
  • Okay, one thing that people keep on forgetting is that the debris pile cuts down on time, since the top of the building now mostly ends up at the top of the pile.
  • Also, I use 12 stories and 6 stories as the size of the debris pile. I believe LC uses 6 stories, but better sources have 12 as a minimum. Neither one is short enough to promote the freefall myth.

 

Back
Top Bottom