Another WTC 7 Conspiracy Theory

njslim

Graduate Poster
Joined
May 30, 2006
Messages
1,077
Trying to debunk the usual range of off the wall conspiracies concerning WTC 7 ( Ie. No plane hit the building, it was a star wars death beam,
Larry Silverman ordered the building pulled, etc) is difficult enough

Get a load of this posted over at the "SCREW LOOSE CHANGE" forum -
it from the goose steeping cretins at the National Vanguard, a neo
nazi, anti Semitie group. It has the Air Force fighters dispatched to
New York on the morning of 9/11 hitting the building with their missiles -
of course all this has been covered up .


http://www.nationalvanguard.org/printer.php?id=10058

Maybe should put these clowns in touch with several of my co-workers,
who were in WTC 7 that morning and ran for their lives.
 
Because there's nothing stealthier that an F-15 screaming overhead at seven hundred miles an hour shouting "Fox Two, Fox Two!"
 
The author, Robert Pate, has been debunked by his mom!

Robert's mom said, His brain was "partly evaporated" due to high temperature fever when he was two.
 
Last edited:
You're welcome...

Edit: Err... The narrator says "moment of inertia" would be one of the factors that should significantly increase the collapse time of WTC7 (2:32 mark in skunkrider's video). Moment of inertia applies to rotating masses...

What the...? Controlled demolitions don't create vacuums that pull the building down. Also, the "clap of thunder" and windows blowing out would be the internal collapse that resulted in the penthouse disappearing into the building as seen in the video I link to.

And, of course, the picture of the "neat pile" is clearly taken after clean-up has already begun.

I can't help but think this has already been debunk a dozen times or more...
 
Last edited:
What always amazes me is how the type of people who think their race is somehow superior are often so embarassingly, jaw-droppingly, cringe-makingly stupid. How anyone can claim that the NWO used planes to fire missiles into the building, in central NY, without anyone noticing... How anyone can claim this, and still, with a straight face, claim to be an example of a superior race, that's just beyond me - maybe if you're stupid enough you don't even realise your own stupidity?

Are you sure it's not satire (a Landover Baptist Church type thing)?
 
Now that the Skunk has been debunked, lets stick to the subject of the thread.

F15 attack on wtc7.
 
what's the point? that it had been burning and that - after seeing the towers collapsing which nobody could predict - firefighters saw wtc7 and expected anything to be possible on that day?

in that case, i agree.
 
What always amazes me is how the type of people who think their race is somehow superior are often so embarassingly, jaw-droppingly, cringe-makingly stupid. How anyone can claim that the NWO used planes to fire missiles into the building, in central NY, without anyone noticing... How anyone can claim this, and still, with a straight face, claim to be an example of a superior race, that's just beyond me - maybe if you're stupid enough you don't even realise your own stupidity?

Are you sure it's not satire (a Landover Baptist Church type thing)?

Oh, did i tell you about the "No planers"? No no - they
are real - they really believe the whole 9/11 thing was
staged computer graphics. :covereyes :boggled:
 
Google Video This video is not hosted by the ISF, the ISF can not be held responsible for the suitability or legality of this material. By clicking the link below you agree to view content from an external website.
I AGREE
 
What always amazes me is how the type of people who think their race is somehow superior are often so embarassingly, jaw-droppingly, cringe-makingly stupid. How anyone can claim that the NWO used planes to fire missiles into the building, in central NY, without anyone noticing... How anyone can claim this, and still, with a straight face, claim to be an example of a superior race, that's just beyond me - maybe if you're stupid enough you don't even realise your own stupidity?

Are you sure it's not satire (a Landover Baptist Church type thing)?


stop evading and explain the physical proof that wtc 7 collapsed partly in free fall speed
 
stop evading and explain the physical proof that wtc 7 collapsed partly in free fall speed

Start your own thread on this subject.

Njslim started this thread to discuss National Vanguard's outlandish theory.
 
Last edited:
stop evading and explain the physical proof that wtc 7 collapsed partly in free fall speed

Who timed it? They did not get the time right. Darn. Can not even get the time right.

Can any CTers find any facts and get anything right?

So you support the F-15 missile theory?
 
stop evading and explain the physical proof that wtc 7 collapsed partly in free fall speed

Stick to the subject of the thread:

a) missiles couldn't be fired in central NY, with so many watching, without being noticed.
b) even if you believe that WTC7 came down 'unnaturally' like a controlled demolition (I don't, but you can start another thread if you want to argue about that), missiles wouldn't be a good way for Them to achieve this. Surprisingly, you don't often see missiles used in controlled demolition :jaw-dropp

Look skunkrider, even if you do believe that WTC7 was brought down in a controlled demolition, or even with space-based beam weapons, that doesn't mean you have to support a bunch of neo-nazi morons making ridiculous claims about missiles. Does it?
 
i just overflew the first post. i don't think this missile thing is true. and i have to stress that i am in no way any of those guys supporting beam weapons, no planes, holoplanes whatsoever.

that's all bs to me. they are ridiculing the movement, and it's distracting from what we should focus on:

wtc 7 + the coincidental failure of the whole american airborne military.
 

Back
Top Bottom