Science Disproves Evolution

[Pahu]

Edited by Darat: 

Breach of Rule 4 removed.

 

[Mojo]

How does any of this "disprove evolution"?

ETA: this was a response to the textdump removed from the previous post, which was at the time the OP of a new thread, not a comment on anything else in the thread.

 

[Pixel42]

This poster has already created a thread of the same name:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=186920

I've reported the OP.

 

[RecoveringYuppy]

Haven't you copied that entire website, one page at a time, to this site (not to mention all the others Google turns up) at least twice in the past?

ETA: Like the posts above mine, this post made more sense before two threads were merged. But the point remains, Pahu has cut and pasted that Walt Brown website to a lot of forums across the net.

 

[catsmate]

As Pahu's suspension will be over tomorrow I thought this would be a good time to look at one of his (dubious) claims, or at least someone else's claim that he's parroted; the falsity of the Miller-Urey experiments.

There have been a number of posts on this subject so I'm not going to rehash territory already covered but I thought that this would be of interest:

“Previously, I testified on the validity of the experiments carried out by Stanley Miller, the so-called Miller-Urey experiments that show that biological materials can be created by gas discharge experiments. The Discovery Institute had chosen to highlight these experiments as a false “Icon of Evolution,” something that the scientists supposedly got wrong. Once this was brought to my attention, I wrote and published a refutation, “Gas, Discharge, and the Discovery Institute,” available via the NCSE. To my knowledge, the facts in this article have not been countered by the Discovery Institute."

This is part of the testimony of Andy Ellington to the Texas school board regarding science textbooks (the whole thing is available here). Ellington further addresses the Discovery Institute's lies/evasions/distortions about the experiments here.

 

[Seismosaurus]

The Law of Biogenesis

Spontaneous generation (the emergence of life from nonliving matter) has never been observed. All observations have shown that life comes only from life. This has been observed so consistently it is called the law of biogenesis. The theory of evolution conflicts with this scientific law when claiming that life came from nonliving matter through natural processes

I don't now if anybody has already said it, but if we did agree with the principle that biological life always and only comes from biological life, then god wouldn't be able to create life. In fact life would have to have existed forever.