• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Same missile?

That you won't accept this makes me think you are a Disinfo Agent. It is so obvious!

You've got it backwards. The rest of the twoofers... NONE of whom push the story a missile hit WTC-7... are all disinfo agents.

It really does make life hell for us down here in NWO payroll.
sweatdrop.gif
 
The film was made to run slower. Did you consider this?
In real time, perhaps you are correct and would not have caught the eye.


When I refer to "would not be visible" I refer to the capabilities of the camera to resolve the missile from the background sky, not the capabilities of the human eye.

The footage you showed does not reflect what would be seen if either an AIM-9 or an AIM-120 were captured on video, as you claim.

The fact that whoever posted the video to YouTube slowed it down is meaningless as the footage was not captured in slow motion - it was in fact captured in real time.

(It's also irrelevant in determining at what distance a camera can resolve an object).
 
Evidence I have presented supporting the Missiles at Ground Zero:

Footage by Fox News taken by local cameraman. (To be discovered and released at a later date)

Footage of the second missile streaking across the plaza.

CNN reporter saying some people saw a missile.

Numerous calls into the police 911 saying they saw missiles shortly after the crash of the second plane.

Naudet footage of the white smoke from the missile hit. (Two examples)

Air traffic controllers saying the Otis fighters arrived just moments after the second plane crashed into WTC 2

Footage of one of the fighters in the area shortly after the second tower was hit.

Bob and Bri video saying they saw a military plane in the area after the second tower was hit.

Photos of WTC 7 on fire near the 12th floor with both towers still standing.

Barry Jennings claim he was in WTC 7 around 9:03 when he and Hess experienced a big explosion. (The missile hit)


Your false claims have been thoroughly discredited. No footage shows a missile. No one saw a missile. No missile was fired anywhere in the U.S. on 9/11.

Incidentally, surely even you realize that not one item on your list rises to the level of evidence. Your "evidence" does not exist. It is hilarious, however, that you pretend that calls to the police claimed seeing your imaginary missile after the crash of Flight 175. Perhaps you might want to think a bit harder about that one.
 
Uh, you're in payroll? I was wondering if we could have a little chat about something.


I know, I know. Bonuses. Look, lots of unexpected expenses came due and even though we control the economy we're still affected by it. The floors were raised and everyone had to take a major hit. Believe me, I hate it as much as anyone.
















OK, fine... we spent it all on blow and strippers. What month is it?
 
Last edited:
The Fox cameraman and the Naudets have footage of the missile strike. They know this because they would have reviewed their footage taken that day.

Incidentally... if the missile theory were the case, then the NYPD would not have stuck near it... Oh, did I forget the shock wave from the missile strike(s) blasting out windows on all sides of WTC 7? Interestingly, the north facade was in surprisingly good condition considering that you've claimed a missile struck it...
 
Evidence I have presented supporting the Missiles at Ground Zero:

Footage by Fox News taken by local cameraman. (To be discovered and released at a later date)

Footage of the second missile streaking across the plaza.

CNN reporter saying some people saw a missile.

Numerous calls to police 911 after the crash of the second plane saying they saw missiles .

Naudet footage of the white smoke from the missile hit. (Two examples)

Air traffic controllers saying the Otis fighters arrived just moments after the second plane crashed into WTC 2

Footage of one of the fighters in the area shortly after the second tower was hit.

Bob and Bri video saying they saw a military plane in the area after the second tower was hit.

Photos of WTC 7 on fire near the 12th floor with both towers still standing.

Barry Jennings claim he was in WTC 7 around 9:03 when he and Hess experienced a big explosion. (The missile hit)

I made the edits on the 911 calls above to be clear.
 
Incidentally... if the missile theory were the case, then the NYPD would not have stuck near it... Oh, did I forget the shock wave from the missile strike(s) blasting out windows on all sides of WTC 7? Interestingly, the north facade was in surprisingly good condition considering that you've claimed a missile struck it...

The missile struck on the south side of WTC 7.
 
Your false claims have been thoroughly discredited. No footage shows a missile. No one saw a missile. No missile was fired anywhere in the U.S. on 9/11.

Incidentally, surely even you realize that not one item on your list rises to the level of evidence. Your "evidence" does not exist. It is hilarious, however, that you pretend that calls to the police claimed seeing your imaginary missile after the crash of Flight 175. Perhaps you might want to think a bit harder about that one.

Footage of the second missile streaking across the plaza.

CNN reporter saying some people saw a missile.

Numerous calls to police 911 after the crash of the second plane saying they saw missiles .

Naudet footage of the white smoke from the missile hit. (Two examples)

Air traffic controllers saying the Otis fighters arrived just moments after the second plane crashed into WTC 2

Footage of one of the fighters in the area shortly after the second tower was hit.

Bob and Bri video saying they saw a military plane in the area after the second tower was hit.

Photos of WTC 7 on fire near the 12th floor with both towers still standing.

Barry Jennings claim he was in WTC 7 around 9:03 when he and Hess experienced a big explosion. (The missile hit)

Which of the above do you claim never happened?
The callers to the police 911 say they saw missiles.
 
Which of the above do you claim never happened?
The callers to the police 911 say they saw missiles.


Cite your sources. And when you have done so, anyone claiming to have seen a missile was wrong.
 
The missile struck on the south side of WTC 7.

ermm... no... I'm not asking where it hit, I am asking why the shockwave from your missile failed to shatter windows on all sides of the WTC 7?
 
The missile struck on the south side of WTC 7.

Oh...you mean the incredible, invisible, nobody-but-you-believes-this, non-destructive, no witness missile?

Why the desperate need to believe such drivel? Is this your only hobby?
 
Oh...you mean the incredible, invisible, nobody-but-you-believes-this, non-destructive, no witness missile?

Why the desperate need to believe such drivel? Is this your only hobby?

This reminds me of the DEW thread which I sided with watching as a spectator... I think the BBC program hit on the mark with this despite that it was referring to explosives, if you detonate something inside a building the pressure wave from the blast would affect all sides of the buildings, meaning shattered windows, not only in the building struck, but as well for adjacent buildings. The failure to explain the absence of this is quite amusing...
 
Here are the Naudet clips claimed as 'evidence.



Unsurprinsingly, they contain absolutely no evidence of a missile.
 
This reminds me of the DEW thread which I sided with watching as a spectator... I think the BBC program hit on the mark with this despite that it was referring to explosives, if you detonate something inside a building the pressure wave from the blast would affect all sides of the buildings, meaning shattered windows, not only in the building struck, but as well for adjacent buildings. The failure to explain the absence of this is quite amusing...

Not if a standard-issued X47A NWO missile was used...such as the one below.

But nobody saw this type of missile either. Sorry MaGZ.

toy-1536b.jpg
 

Back
Top Bottom